| Literature DB >> 35166086 |
Gary R Ge1, Behrouz Tavakol2, David B Usher2, Desmond C Adler2, Jannick P Rolland1,3,4, Kevin J Parker3,5.
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE: Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is a well-known procedure for treating certain eye disorders such as keratoconus. However, characterization of the biomechanical changes in the cornea as a result of this procedure is still under active research. Specifically, there is a clinical need for high-resolution characterization of individual corneal layers. AIM: A high-resolution elastography method in conjunction with a custom optical coherence tomography system is used to track these biomechanical changes in individual corneal layers. Pre- and post-treatment analysis for both low-dose and high-dose CXL experiments are performed. APPROACH: A recently developed elastography technique that utilizes the theory of reverberant shear wave fields, with optical coherence tomography as the modality, is applied to pig corneas ex vivo to evaluate elasticity changes associated with corneal CXL. Sets of low-dose and high-dose CXL treatments are evaluated before and after treatments with three pairs of pig corneas per experiment.Entities:
Keywords: cornea; cross-linking; elastography; optical coherence tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35166086 PMCID: PMC8843360 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.27.2.026003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.758
Fig. 1Experimental setup for Rev3D-OCE.
Fig. 2(a) Pre- and (b) post-CXL 3D B-mode scans of a sample pig cornea in a high-dose CXL experiment. Color bar in arbitrary grayscale units following log transformation of raw scans.
Fig. 3(a) Pre- and (b) post-CXL sample motion frames of a sample pig cornea in a high-dose CXL experiment. Color bar in arbitrary units of particle velocity.
Fig. 4(a) Pre- and (b) post-CXL SWS maps of a sample pig cornea in a high-dose CXL experiment. Color bar units for the SWS are in m/s.
Fig. 5(a) 3D difference map created by centering and subtracting the two SWS maps in Fig. 4. Color bar units are in m/s. (b) Averaged SWS as a function of depth in the 3-mm treatment zone. The CXL procedure results in increased SWS. The difference between pre- and post-CXL profiles is denoted as ΔCXL.
Fig. 6(a) SWS profiles for low-dose CXL experiments ( eyes). (b) SWS profiles for high dose CXL experiments ( eyes). (c) Increases in SWS profiles are compared between the low- and high-dose experiments. Average values are plotted with standard error of the mean in shaded red or blue.
Summary of previous studies with similar experimental conditions for comparison.
| Study model | Animal model | OCE method | Excitation frequency | Results [m/s] (converted/averaged) | Approximate SWS increase (m/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamb wave model | Rabbit ( | Air pulse |
| Untreated: 1.4 | 2.5 |
| CXL: 3.9 | |||||
| Modified Rayleigh–Lamb (multifrequency) | Porcine ( | Air pulse |
| Untreated: 4.16 | 1.9 |
| CXL: 6.06 | |||||
| Anisotropic model | Porcine ( | Air pulse | n/a | Untreated: 4.08 | 2.6 |
| CXL: 6.71 | |||||
| Modified Rayleigh–Lamb (multifrequency) | Rabbit ( | Air pulse |
| Untreated: 4.93 | 1.1 |
| CXL: 6.01 |