Literature DB >> 35165755

Patients with advanced lateral osteoarthritis can return to sports and work after distraction arthroplasty plus lateral meniscal allograft transplantation combined with cartilage repair.

Dhong Won Lee1, Dong Ryun Lee1, Min Ah Kim2, Seung Ik Cho3, Joon Kyu Lee1, Jin Goo Kim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report return to sports (RTS) and return to work (RTW) outcomes after distraction arthroplasty (DA) plus lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) combined with cartilage repair in active patients with advanced osteoarthritis. It was hypothesised that DA combined with lateral MAT would improve clinical and radiological outcomes and enable RTS and RTW for most patients.
METHODS: In total, 21 patients with advanced osteoarthritis (moderate to severe joint space narrowing at lateral edge on Rosenberg view and large cartilage defect of lateral femoral condyle) who underwent concomitant DA and MAT were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using subjective knee scores [Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, and Tegner activity scale (TAS)] and functional tests (isokinetic extensor muscle strength test, single-leg vertical jump test, and single-leg hop for distance test). The rates of RTS, RTW, and satisfaction were evaluated. Radiological outcomes were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray (Rosenberg view).
RESULTS: The mean age at surgery and mean follow-up duration were 37.2 ± 5.9 years and 37.1 ± 5.4 months, respectively. All improvements in subjective scores were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The Lysholm score improved from 58.3 ± 8.1 to 84.3 ± 8.2, the IKDC subjective score from 53.9 ± 10.4 to 78.0 ± 7.7, and the TAS from 4.0 ± 0.5 to 5.1 ± 0.8. The limb symmetry index (LSI) (%) of the extensor peak torque at an angular velocity of 60°/s improved from 67.3 ± 19.2 to 88.4 ± 20.3% (p = 0.001). The LSI of the single-leg vertical jump test and single-leg hop for distance test improved from 62.8 ± 21.3 to 87.7 ± 19.5% and from 63.9 ± 20.8 to 85.5 ± 18.1%, respectively (all, p < 0.001). All patients were able to return to any sports activity and work. However, 67% and 90.5% returned to their defined or desired level of sports activity and occupation intensity, respectively. Further, 76.2% were very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the outcome at the last follow-up. The JSW increased by 0.8 ± 0.4 to 2.3 ± 0.6 mm (p = 0.005). In more than 90% of patients, > 50% of cartilage lesion was covered. The mean graft extrusion was 2.6 ± 1.0 mm.
CONCLUSION: All patients who underwent distraction arthroplasty plus lateral MAT combined with cartilage repair returned to any sports and work at the last follow-up. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes and the radiographic joint space width were observed. However, the activity ability was somewhat reduced compared with the best preoperative level. This one-stage joint salvage treatment is a promising option for young and active patients with advanced OA who wish to return to high levels of sports activity and occupation intensity (≥ Tegner activity scale 4). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage repair; Joint distraction; Knee osteoarthritis; Meniscal allograft transplantation; Return to sports; Return to work

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35165755     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06864-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  7 in total

1.  A prospective study on knee proprioception after meniscal allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Y Thijs; E Witvrouw; B Evens; P Coorevits; F Almqvist; R Verdonk
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  The minimal clinically important difference for the nonarthritic hip score at 2-years following hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  David A Bloom; Daniel J Kaplan; David J Kirby; Daniel B Buchalter; Charles C Lin; Jordan W Fried; Nainisha Chintalapudi; Thomas Youm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Joint distraction for osteoarthritis: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Simon C Mastbergen
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Letter to the Editor.

Authors:  Mylène Jansen; Floris Lafeber
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Return to Sport and Work after Randomization for Knee Distraction versus High Tibial Osteotomy: Is There a Difference?

Authors:  Alexander Hoorntje; P Paul F M Kuijer; Koen L M Koenraadt; Suzanne Waterval-Witjes; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Simon C Mastbergen; Anne C A Marijnissen; Mylène P Jansen; Rutger C I van Geenen
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.501

6.  The role of joint distraction in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  En Lin Goh; Winston Choong Ngan Lou; Swathikan Chidambaram; Shaocheng Ma
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2019-08-07

Review 7.  Incidence and Extent of Graft Extrusion following Meniscus Allograft Transplantation.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.