Literature DB >> 3516575

A comparison of intermittent mandatory ventilation systems.

K Hillman, J Friedlos, A Davey.   

Abstract

Many recent ventilators used in the ICU have a demand valve for intermittent gas flow. While demand systems conserve gas flow, they do not appear to be as well tolerated by patients as are continuous flow systems. Using a mechanical model to simulate a patient's spontaneous breathing efforts, we tested nine common ventilators in the intermittent mode. Their sensitivity varied from -2.0 to -0.2 cm H2O and the total delay time from 19 to 92 msec. The initial inspiratory resistance varied between 0.03 and 0.10 cm H2O/L X min and initial flow was between 2.5 and 12.3 L/min. These values were often not supplied or not the same as those in the manufacturer's specifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3516575     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198605000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  2 in total

1.  Total inspiratory work with modern demand valve devices compared to continuous flow CPAP.

Authors:  L F Samodelov; K J Falke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Investigation of the spontaneous modes of breathing of different ventilators.

Authors:  D Cox; S F Tinloi; J G Farrimond
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.