| Literature DB >> 35165301 |
Ko Ko1, Kazuaki Takahashi1, Shintaro Nagashima1, Bunthen E1,2, Serge Ouoba1,3, Md Razeen Ashraf Hussain1, Tomoyuki Akita1, Aya Sugiyama1, Takemasa Sakaguchi4, Hidetoshi Tahara5, Hiroki Ohge6, Hideki Ohdan7, Tatsuhiko Kubo8, Nobuhisa Ishikawa9, Toshiro Takafuta10, Yoshiki Fujii11, Michi Mimori12, Fumie Okada13, Eisaku Kishita13, Kunie Ariyoshi14, Masao Kuwabara15, Junko Tanaka16.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop the feasible and effective universal screening strategy of the notable SARS-CoV-2 variants by Sanger Sequencing Strategy and then practically applied it for mass screening in Hiroshima, Japan. A total of 734 samples from COVID-19 confirmed cases in Hiroshima were screened for the notable SARS-CoV-2 variants (B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.1, C.37, B.1.1.529, etc.). The targeted spike region is amplified by nested RT-PCR using in-house designed primer set hCoV-Spike-A and standard amplification protocol. Additionally, randomly selected 96 samples were also amplified using primer sets hCoV-Spike-B and hCoV-Spike-C. The negative amplified samples were repeated for second attempt of amplification by volume-up protocol. Thereafter, the amplified products were assigned for Sanger sequencing using corresponding primers. The positive amplification rate of primer set hCoV-Spike-A, hCoV-Spike-B and hCoV-Spike-C were 87.3%, 83.3% and 93.8% respectively for standard protocol and increased to 99.6%, 95.8% and 96.9% after second attempt by volume-up protocol. The readiness of genome sequences was 96.9%, 100% and 100% respectively. Among 48 mutant isolates, 26 were B.1.1.7 (Alpha), 7 were E484K single mutation and the rest were other types of mutation. Moreover, 5 cluster cases with single mutation at N501S were firstly reported in Hiroshima. This study indicates the reliability and effectiveness of Sanger sequencing to screen large number of samples for the notable SARS-CoV-2 variants. Compared to the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), our method introduces the feasible, universally applicable, and practically useful tool for identification of the emerging variants with less expensive and time consuming especially in those countries where the NGS is not practically available. Our method allows not only to identify the pre-existing variants but also to examine other rare type of mutation or newly emerged variants and is crucial for prevention and control of pandemic.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35165301 PMCID: PMC8844052 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-04952-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow of study subjects in Hiroshima, Japan. The figure showed the sources of the study subjects included in this study during each wave outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Hiroshima.
SARS-CoV-2 specific primers used for partial sequences of particular region.
| Stage polarity | Primer name | Nucleotide position | Nucleotide sequence (5′-3′) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Primers used in polymerase chain reaction | |||||
| hCoV-Spike-A (Ver.1) | PCR 1st Sense | SP31S | 22,882–22,902 | TCTTGATTCTAAGGTTGGTGG | |
| PCR 1st Sense | SP32S | 22,904–22,927 | AATTATAATTACCTGTATAGATTG | ||
| PCR 1st Antisense | SP35AS | 23,612–23,631 | TGACTAGCTACACTACGTGC | ||
| PCR 1st Antisense | SP36AS | 23,577–23,598 | TTAGTCTGAGTCTGATAACTAG | ||
| PCR 2nd Sense | SP07S | 22,929–22,950 | TTTAGGAAGTCTAATCTCAAACC | ||
| PCR 2nd Sense | SP33S | 22,923–22,945 | GATTGTTTAGGAAGTCTAATCTC | ||
| PCR 2nd Antisense | SP37AS | 23,556–23,575 | GCATATACCTGCACCAATGG | ||
| PCR 2nd Antisense | SP38AS | 23,533–23,554 | TATGTCACACTCATATGAGTTG | ||
| hCoV-Spike-B (Ver.2) | PCR 1st Sense | SP45S | 22,790–22,809 | ATCGCTCCAGGGCAAACTGG | |
| PCR 1st Sense | SP46S | 22,834–22,855 | ATTACCAGATGATTTTACAGGC | ||
| PCR 1st Antisense | SP35AS | 23,612–23,631 | TGACTAGCTACACTACGTGC | ||
| PCR 1st Antisense | SP36AS | 23,577–23,598 | TTAGTCTGAGTCTGATAACTAG | ||
| PCR 2nd Sense | SP31S | 22,882–22,902 | TCTTGATTCTAAGGTTGGTGG | ||
| PCR 2nd Sense | SP47S | 22,858–22,879 | CGTTATAGCTTGGAATTCTAAC | ||
| PCR 2nd Antisense | SP37AS | 23,556–23,575 | GCATATACCTGCACCAATGG | ||
| PCR 2nd Antisense | SP38AS | 23,533–23,554 | TATGTCACACTCATATGAGTTG | ||
| hCoV-Spike-C | PCR 1st Sense | 22632S | 22,632–22,652 | GAATCAGCAACTGTGTTGCTG | |
| PCR 1st Sense | 22659S | 22,659–22,680 | CTGTCCTATATAATTCCGCATC | ||
| PCR 1st Antisense | 23170AS | 23,170–23,193 | TTGAAGTTGAAATTGACACATTTG | ||
| PCR 1st Antisense | 23201AS | 23,201–23,221 | AGTAAGAACACCTGTGCCTG | ||
| PCR 2nd Sense | 22687S | 22,687–22,708 | CACTTTTAAGTGTTATGGAGTG | ||
| PCR 2nd Sense | 22712S | 22,712–22,734 | CCTACTAAATTAAATGATCTCTG | ||
| PCR 2nd Antisense | 23117AS | 23,117–23,138 | CACAAACAGTTGCTGGTGCATG | ||
| PCR 2nd Antisense | 23141AS | 23,141–23,164 | AACCAAATTAGTAGACTTTTTAGG | ||
Figure 2Schematic mutation pattern of notable SARS-COV-2 variants and its primer product. This figure explained the classification criteria for the identification and screening of B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma), B1.617.2 (Delta), B.1.617.1 (Kappa), C.37 (Lambda and B.1.1.529 (Omicron). All those mutations were in the spike region and the targeted fragment of SARS-CoV-2 was amplified by primer set hCoV-Spike A, hCoV-Spike-B and hCoV-Spike-C so that the expected genome sequences were also shown.
Figure 3Viral load dependent postivity of nested PCR for spike region using a) primer set version 1, b) primer set version 2 and c) primer set version 3. The first scattered plot in a) showed the positive amplification versus the viral load for the primer set hCoV-Spike-A. The red colored dots represent those positive amplification by the standard protocol, the blue color for positive amplification by the volume-up protocol and the while color with blue marginated dots represent for the negative amplification by both protocols. The scattered plot in b) and c) showed for the primer set hCoV-Spike-B and hCoV-Spike-C respectively.
Figure 4Amplification positive rate and readiness of Sanger sequences using primer set hCoV-Spike-A, hCoV-Spike-B and hCoV-Spike-C. This figure showed the positive rate of amplification by nested RT-PCR using the specific primer set hCoV-Spike-A, hCoV-Spike-B and hCoV-Spike-C respectively and also their readiness of partial genomes after direct sequencing.
Figure 5The mutation pattern found in selective screeing of the notable SARS-CoV-2 variants in Hiroshima. The figure showed the amino acid sequences translated from the genome sequences of the target spike region. The mutation points were showed with triangle on the uppermost row and all the genome sequences were compared to the reference strain (Wuhan-Hu-1) retrieved from GeneBank. All isolates from this study without any mutation at target fragment (N = 704) were shown as Hiro_Iso and those with mutation were shown individually.
Figure 6Prevalence of the notable SARS-CoV-2 variants in Hiroshima. The bar graph described the prevalence of B.1.1.7 (Alpha), E484K and the other forms of mutation found in Hiroshima Japan. The red color represents B.1.1.7 (Alpha), the orange color shows E484K mutation, the green color for the other forms of mutation and the blue color for those having no mutation at targeted spike region. The other forms of mutation include single mutations of N501S, I584V, R481K, F515L, P521L, T553S, N606S, A609G, double mutation of K557E and Q613R, and triple mutation of L513F, Q580R and V615A.