Literature DB >> 35164867

Seasonality and transmissibility of Plasmodium ovale in Bagamoyo District, Tanzania.

Brian B Tarimo1, Vincent O Nyasembe2, Jessica T Lin3, Derrick K Mathias4, Billy Ngasala5, Christopher Basham3, Isaack J Rutagi1, Meredith Muller3, Srijana B Chhetri3, Rebecca Rubinstein3, Jonathan J Juliano3, Mwajabu Loya5, Rhoel R Dinglasan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plasmodium ovale is a neglected malarial parasite that can form latent hypnozoites in the human liver. Over the last decade, molecular surveillance studies of non-falciparum malaria in Africa have highlighted that P. ovale is circulating below the radar, including areas where Plasmodium falciparum is in decline. To eliminate malaria where P. ovale is endemic, a better understanding of its epidemiology, asymptomatic carriage, and transmission biology is needed.
METHODS: We performed a pilot study on P. ovale transmission as part of an ongoing study of human-to-mosquito transmission of P. falciparum from asymptomatic carriers. To characterize the malaria asymptomatic reservoir, cross-sectional qPCR surveys were conducted in Bagamoyo, Tanzania, over three transmission seasons. Positive individuals were enrolled in transmission studies of P. falciparum using direct skin feeding assays (DFAs) with Anopheles gambiae s.s. (IFAKARA strain) mosquitoes. For a subset of participants who screened positive for P. ovale on the day of DFA, we incubated blood-fed mosquitoes for 14 days to assess sporozoite development.
RESULTS: Molecular surveillance of asymptomatic individuals revealed a P. ovale prevalence of 11% (300/2718), compared to 29% (780/2718) for P. falciparum. Prevalence for P. ovale was highest at the beginning of the long rainy season (15.5%, 128/826) in contrast to P. falciparum, which peaked later in both the long and short rainy seasons. Considering that these early-season P. ovale infections were low-density mono-infections (127/128), we speculate many were due to hypnozoite-induced relapse. Six of eight P. ovale-infected asymptomatic individuals who underwent DFAs successfully transmitted P. ovale parasites to A. gambiae.
CONCLUSIONS: Plasmodium ovale is circulating at 4-15% prevalence among asymptomatic individuals in coastal Tanzania, largely invisible to field diagnostics. A different seasonal peak from co-endemic P. falciparum, the capacity to relapse, and efficient transmission to Anopheles vectors likely contribute to its persistence amid control efforts focused on P. falciparum.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles gambiae; Asymptomatic; Direct feeding assay (DFA); Malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; Plasmodium ovale; Tanzania

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35164867      PMCID: PMC8842944          DOI: 10.1186/s13071-022-05181-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


Molecular surveillance studies of non-falciparum malaria in Africa over the last decade have highlighted that Plasmodium ovale is circulating below the radar [1, 2] and consists of two distinct species, P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri [3, 4], that are rising in prevalence, including in areas where Plasmodium falciparum is in decline [5-8]. These studies have been primarily country-level surveys conducted intermittently over several years, while fewer studies have examined the local epidemiology driving these trends. We applied P. ovale-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays in the context of an ongoing study of the asymptomatic P. falciparum infectious reservoir in Bagamoyo, Tanzania, to examine the seasonality and transmissibility of P. ovale sensu lato (hereafter P. ovale). Herein, we describe the results of cross-sectional surveys across three malaria transmission seasons and of a pilot study that used direct skin feeding assays (DFAs) in subjects with P. falciparum/P. ovale infection to explore their infectivity to mosquitoes. Bagamoyo district in coastal Tanzania has moderate malaria transmission that occurs throughout the year, with peaks during the long (March to June) and short (October to December) rainy seasons. Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus s.s. are the main vectors [9]. Participants aged 6 years and above without fevers or chills in the preceding 3 days were recruited from schools and health centers in the villages of Fukayosi, Mwavi, and Yombo for screening during the long and short rainy seasons from October 2018–December 2019, as well as for 1 month into the dry season following the long rains in 2019. Finger-prick blood was used to make thick and thin blood smears, perform dual-antigen histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) and parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) rapid diagnostic tests (RDT; SD Bioline), and create two to three dried 50 µl blood spots (DBS) on Whatman 3MM filter paper. Species-specific P. falciparum qPCR targeting 18S rRNA was performed on DBS-extracted DNA as described [10]. For P. ovale, primers and probe targeting an 18S rRNA region conserved in P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri were used [2]. Midway through the study, qPCR was shifted to Bagamoyo, with the same protocol modified for use with Sahara Hot Start PCR Master Mix (Chai Biotechnologies). For P. falciparum detection, samples were run in duplicate and considered positive if the cycle threshold (Ct) was < 40 cycles in at least one reaction. For P. ovale detection, samples were initially run singly and considered positive if Ct was < 40 cycles. Since low-density parasitemia is common in P. ovale infections, samples were also considered positive if Ct ≥ 40 but < 45 and then confirmed by qPCR in a subsequent independent reaction. All participants positive for malaria by microscopy and/or RDT were treated with artemisinin combination therapy in accordance with Tanzanian national guidelines. Female A. gambiae s.s. (IFAKARA strain) mosquitoes (4–7 days post-emergence) were used in all mosquito feeding assays. The IFAKARA colony was established in 1996 from mosquitoes collected in southeastern Tanzania [11] and has been maintained in the laboratory since then. To generate experimental mosquitoes, eggs were collected on moist filter paper, rinsed with 1% bleach, and hatched in plastic pans containing deionized water. Larvae were reared in plastic bowls in deionized water and fed daily with TetraMin® fish food. Pupae were transferred to 30 × 30 × 30 cm cages in a climate-controlled room at a constant temperature of 27 °C and relative humidity of 70–80%. Emerged adults were maintained in the same cages on 10% sucrose solution until they were transferred to 500 ml mesh-covered cups for feeding assays. Mosquitoes not used in experiments were fed blood (acquired from a blood bank through Bagamoyo District Hospital) using a Hemotek artificial feeding system to produce eggs for colony maintenance. Participants positive by RDT or P. falciparum qPCR were enrolled for mosquito direct skin feeding assays (DFAs) on the same day (RDT+) or within 6 days of screening (PCR+). For a subset who were qPCR-positive for P. ovale on the day of DFA, mosquito-dissection procedures were modified to enable molecular evaluation for sporozoite development. Briefly, female mosquitoes were prepared as described above and starved 4–6 h prior to DFAs. For each assay, a cup with 25 mosquitoes was attached to each calf of a participant (50 mosquitoes/participant) and allowed to feed for 15 min. If the participant expressed discomfort, the DFA was stopped immediately. Blood-fed mosquitoes were kept in climate-controlled incubators (27 °C, 70–80% humidity, 12:12 h light/dark) for 24 h without access to sucrose or water to kill unfed mosquitoes and were maintained on 10% sucrose thereafter for the duration of the experiment. On day 8 post-DFA, midguts from a subset of mosquitoes were dissected, stained with 0.1% Mercurochrome, and scored for oocysts. Positive midguts were individually stored in DNA/RNA Shield (Zymo Research) for Plasmodium screening by qPCR. If one or more oocyst-positive midguts were found in the first 10 dissected, the remaining mosquitoes were maintained until day 14 post-DFA, when mosquito abdomens were removed and heads/thoraxes were pooled in groups of up to five for DNA extraction and qPCR. DNA from mosquito heads/thoraxes stored in DNA/RNA Shield was extracted using the Quick-DNA Tissue/Insect Kit (Zymo Research) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA from oocyst-positive midguts stored in DNA/RNA Shield was extracted using DNAzol Reagent (Invitrogen). Prior to homogenization, samples were centrifuged at 3000×g for 15 s, DNA/RNA Shield was removed, and 100 µl of DNAzol was added. Samples were homogenized with a sterilized pestle, brought to 1 ml with DNAzol, and incubated at room temperature for 2 min. After incubation, 0.2 µg of glycogen and 500 µl of −20 °C ethanol was added, and samples were centrifuged at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The remaining steps followed the DNAzol manufacturer’s instructions. Species-specific qPCR was performed as described above. Malaria screening and mosquito-infection data were entered into a RedCAP database. The prevalence of P. falciparum and P. ovale was calculated for each enrollment period. Associations with sex, age, and season were analyzed by log-binomial regression in Stata v.16.1. Rainfall data for the study area were acquired from the Tanzania Meteorological Agency (TMA; https://www.meteo.go.tz). The transmissibility of P. ovale parasite carriers was assessed based on frequency of mosquito midgut and salivary gland/sporozoite infection. Over three transmission seasons (October 2018 to December 2019), 2718 asymptomatic individuals aged 6 years and older underwent malaria screening. Overall, P. falciparum prevalence by qPCR was 29% (780/2718), while 15% (382/2718) were positive by RDT (HRP2 band), and 12% (316/2718) were smear-positive. Plasmodium ovale prevalence by qPCR was 11% (300/2718), ranging from 4 to 15% (Table 1). Only 7.7% (23/300) of P. ovale qPCR-positive infections had any parasites (P. falciparum or P. ovale) detected by microscopy, while 9.7% (29/300) were diagnosed with malaria based on a positive RDT (HRP2 band present indicating presence of P. falciparum antigen). Thus, approximately 90% (271/300) of asymptomatic P. ovale infections were invisible to routine malaria diagnostic testing, compared to roughly half (54%, 422/780) of asymptomatic P. falciparum infections.
Table 1

Characteristics of participants screened for Plasmodium during the study period

CharacteristicsTotalP. ovale statusa
PositiveNegative
Number screened2718300 (11%)2418 (89%)
Age, median (IQR)20 (11–32)23 (12–32)19 (11–32)
 Children/adolescents (≤ 17 years old)1222 (45%)112 (9.2%)1110 (91%)
 Adults (≥ 18 years old)1496 (55%)188 (13%)1308 (87%)
Sex
 Female1831 (67%)202 (11%)b1629
 Male887 (33%)98 (11%)789
P. falciparum
 Positivea780 (29%)33 (11%)c747
 Negative1938 (71%)267 (89%)d1671
RDT
 Positive382 (14%)29 (10%)b353
 Negative2336 (86%)271 (90%)2065
Blood smear
 Positive316 (12%)23 (7.7%)b293
 Negative2402 (88%)277 (92%)2125
Season
 Oct–Nov 2018 (short rains)527 (19%)21 (4.0%)e506
 Apr–May 2019 (long rains, early)826 (30%)128 (15%)698
 Jun–Jul 2019 (long rains, late)829 (31%)120 (14%)709
 Oct–Dec 2019 (short rains)536 (20%)31 (5.8%)505

Data are shown for all individuals screened and by P. ovale infection status

aPlasmodium ovale and P. falciparum status were determined by 18S qPCR; subjects deemed positive if the Ct value of the first qPCR was < 40 or if the mean Ct value of the first qPCR and at least one follow-up qPCR was < 45

bPercentages in this column for sex, RDT, and blood smear are from the total who were qPCR-positive for P. ovale

cPercentage of P. ovale-positive individuals co-infected with P. falciparum

dPercentage of P. ovale-positive individuals with mono-infections

ePercentages in the P. ovale-positive column indicate season-specific prevalence

Characteristics of participants screened for Plasmodium during the study period Data are shown for all individuals screened and by P. ovale infection status aPlasmodium ovale and P. falciparum status were determined by 18S qPCR; subjects deemed positive if the Ct value of the first qPCR was < 40 or if the mean Ct value of the first qPCR and at least one follow-up qPCR was < 45 bPercentages in this column for sex, RDT, and blood smear are from the total who were qPCR-positive for P. ovale cPercentage of P. ovale-positive individuals co-infected with P. falciparum dPercentage of P. ovale-positive individuals with mono-infections ePercentages in the P. ovale-positive column indicate season-specific prevalence Parasite prevalence varied significantly by season with P. falciparum and P. ovale infections peaking at different times of the year (Fig. 1). While P. falciparum prevalence was highest during the short rainy seasons in October–November (32% and 39% for both months combined, respectively, in 2018 and 2019), P. ovale prevalence peaked early in the long rainy season in April–May 2019 (16%), reaching comparable numbers to P. falciparum in April (21% vs. 18% for P. ovale and P. falciparum, respectively). Plasmodium ovale prevalence subsequently dropped three- to fourfold during the October–November short rainy season when P. falciparum cases were highest.
Fig. 1

Monthly parasite prevalence (left Y-axis) among asymptomatic participants for P. falciparum (blue bars), P. ovale (orange bars), and P. ovale mono-infections (gray bars). The total monthly rainfall is denoted by the blue line (right Y-axis)

Monthly parasite prevalence (left Y-axis) among asymptomatic participants for P. falciparum (blue bars), P. ovale (orange bars), and P. ovale mono-infections (gray bars). The total monthly rainfall is denoted by the blue line (right Y-axis) Plasmodium falciparum/P. ovale co-infections were not common overall (33 total, or 4.2% of P. falciparum [33/780] and 11% of P. ovale [33/300] infections) (Table 1), but they exhibited striking seasonality (Fig. 1). The majority of P. falciparum/P. ovale co-infections occurred during the short rainy season in October–November, when 71.4% (15/21) and 38.7% (12/31) of P. ovale infections were mixed in 2018 and 2019, respectively. In contrast, all but one of the 128 P. ovale infections detected during April–May 2019 were mono-infections. These had higher qPCR C values on average compared to P. ovale infections detected in all other seasons combined (C = 41.0 vs. 39.8, t(298) = 3.79, P < 0.001), suggesting lower parasite densities. Male sex and younger age were associated with increased risk of infection with P. falciparum but not P. ovale. For P. falciparum, males were 1.5 times more likely to be infected compared to females (RR = 1.5, P < 0.001), and the risk of infection decreased slightly with each year in age (RR = 0.99, P < 0.001). In contrast, sex and age were not associated with P. ovale infection risk when examined as continuous variables, either in univariate analysis or when the model included sex, age, and season. However, the median age of P. ovale-positive versus negative persons was greater by 4 years (Table 1), and the point prevalence of P. ovale was slightly higher in adults aged 18 years and older (12.6%, 188/1496) compared to children and adolescents 6–17 years of age (9.2%, 112/1222) (Z = −2.82, P = 0.005). For P. falciparum/P. ovale co-infections, each yearly increase in age reduced the relative risk of co-infection by 4.3% (RR = 0.96, P = 0.04), with males being more likely to be co-infected than females (RR = 3.3, P = 0.001). Over 4 weeks in October–November 2019, qPCR screening of participants undergoing DFA detected P. ovale in eight participants, aged 9–52 years (median 23.5 years). Mosquitoes fed on these participants who harbored P. ovale on the day of DFA were evaluated for P. falciparum and P. ovale infection. Five participants were PCR-positive for mixed P. falciparum/P. ovale infection, while three had P. ovale mono-infection by qPCR (Table 2). The majority of DFAs (6 of 8) yielded P. ovale infections in mosquitoes at either day 8 or day 14 post-DFA, regardless of the mixed infection status observed at screening or enrollment (Table 2). In all four experiments where pooled mosquitoes (head and thoraxes) were available for testing at day 14 post-DFA, the presence of P. ovale sporozoites was detected by qPCR, with all but one experiment yielding mosquitoes infected solely or predominantly with P. ovale.
Table 2

Results of human-to-mosquito transmission experiments from subjects recruited after screening who were positive for P. ovale infection by PCR on day of DFA (direct feeding assay)

Subject IDBlood PCRa on day of DFANo. of positive midgutsMidgut PCR at D8 post-feedingNo. of PCR+ mosquito pools at D14 post-feedingP. ovale-positive mosquitoes onlybP. falciparum- & P. ovale-positive mosquitoes
P. falciparumP. ovaleP. falciparumP. ovaleP. falciparumP. ovale
MqTZ-2312++++ 1/3NDND0/76/7
MqTZ-2390+++ + 3/10+++ 5/64/6
MqTZ-2394+++ +++3/47+ NDND
MqTZ-2396+++ ++ 1/10++ +/–0/65/6
MqTZ-2431+++3/48++ NDND
MqTZ-2499+++ +++5/10+++ 1/148/14
MqTZ-2556+1/34+ ++ NDND
MqTZ-2563+++0/43NDNDNDND

In all DFA experiments, mosquito midguts were dissected at day 8 (D8) post-feeding for detection of parasite oocysts by microscopy. In four subjects (subject ID in boldface), additional mosquitoes were held until day 14 (D14) post-feeding to assess sporozoite development by qPCR

aFor qPCR results, +++ denotes a mean C value ≤ 32, ++ denotes a mean C value > 32 but < 40, + denotes a mean C value ≥ 40, and – indicates that no qPCR product was detected. For qPCRs with a C  ≥ 40, only those with a confirmatory follow-up qPCR are reported

bPlasmodium ovale infection status determined at D14

Results of human-to-mosquito transmission experiments from subjects recruited after screening who were positive for P. ovale infection by PCR on day of DFA (direct feeding assay) In all DFA experiments, mosquito midguts were dissected at day 8 (D8) post-feeding for detection of parasite oocysts by microscopy. In four subjects (subject ID in boldface), additional mosquitoes were held until day 14 (D14) post-feeding to assess sporozoite development by qPCR aFor qPCR results, +++ denotes a mean C value ≤ 32, ++ denotes a mean C value > 32 but < 40, + denotes a mean C value ≥ 40, and – indicates that no qPCR product was detected. For qPCRs with a C  ≥ 40, only those with a confirmatory follow-up qPCR are reported bPlasmodium ovale infection status determined at D14 We report the comparative prevalence of P. falciparum and P. ovale among asymptomatic carriers in coastal Tanzania over a 14-month period and demonstrate human-to-mosquito transmission of P. ovale parasites to A. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes. Plasmodium ovale prevalence was substantial, ranging from 4 to 15%, with 90% of this burden invisible to routine diagnostics (RDT and microscopy). Our longitudinal analysis reveals a seasonality to P. ovale cases that contrasts with co-endemic P. falciparum, peaking near the beginning of the long rainy season in April, when P. falciparum prevalence is relatively lower. This seasonal pattern could be due to variability in transmission of the two parasite species driven by seasonal differences in Anopheles spp. abundance combined with varying transmission efficiency for certain vector–parasite combinations. Nothing is known about which anopheline species efficiently transmit P. ovale, but our pilot study suggests that P. ovale readily infects A. gambiae, historically the main vector for P. falciparum in the region. These observations, along with the relatively high proportion of P. falciparum/P. ovale co-infections in October–November and reported in other studies [2, 5, 6], suggest that the two parasite species are frequently co-transmitted in the same mosquitoes, a phenomenon we also observed in two DFA participants. Notably, the early-season P. ovale cases in April–May were virtually all mono-infections and exhibited lower parasite densities than co-infections occurring in October–November. This raises the question of whether the influx of low-density mono-infections during these months arose from hypnozoite-induced relapse [12]. Seasonal patterns of P. vivax versus P. falciparum have previously been used to infer the proportion of vivax cases due to relapse [13, 14]. While there is still much to be learned about the relapse patterns of P. ovale, relapses occurring in April–June, 4 to 6 months following mosquito bites in October–November, could be consistent with the relapse intervals (a median of 15 weeks) observed in a longitudinal cohort study of P. ovale-infected persons in Gabon [15]. Interestingly, the seasonal pattern of 77 imported cases of P. ovale in China from 2010 to 2017 resembles our observations, with cases peaking slightly higher in April than October [16]. We speculate that relapses may have evolved to occur when anopheline vectors are increasing in abundance at the onset of the rainy season. The use of skin feeding assays combined with on-site PCR detection allowed us to highlight what appears to be highly efficient human-to-mosquito transmission of P. ovale from asymptomatic carriers invisible to routine diagnostics, including those with mixed-species infection. There is much more to be learned about whether this holds true during different seasons, with different anopheline vectors, and for different P. ovale species (P. ovale curtisi vs. P. ovale wallikeri). Limitations to this study include its cross-sectional nature, small sample of subjects in the DFA study, lack of data in the months between rainy seasons, and the use of insectary-reared mosquitoes to assess infectivity. We have not yet determined the species of these P. ovale isolates (as P. ovale curtisi or P. ovale wallikeri), many of which are low-density samples. We provide the first direct evidence of efficient transmission from asymptomatic P. ovale carriers to A. gambiae and seasonal patterns of P. ovale infection in coastal Tanzania that may provide clues to how this species, which remains largely undetected, continues to circulate amid heightened efforts to control and eliminate malaria.
  15 in total

1.  Two nonrecombining sympatric forms of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium ovale occur globally.

Authors:  Colin J Sutherland; Naowarat Tanomsing; Debbie Nolder; Mary Oguike; Charlie Jennison; Sasithon Pukrittayakamee; Christiane Dolecek; Tran Tinh Hien; Virgilio E do Rosário; Ana Paula Arez; João Pinto; Pascal Michon; Ananias A Escalante; Francois Nosten; Martina Burke; Rogan Lee; Marie Blaze; Thomas Dan Otto; John W Barnwell; Arnab Pain; John Williams; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P J Day; Georges Snounou; Peter J Lockhart; Peter L Chiodini; Mallika Imwong; Spencer D Polley
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  The role of four anopheline species (Diptera: Culicidae) in malaria transmission in coastal Tanzania.

Authors:  E A Temu; J N Minjas; M Coetzee; R H Hunt; C J Shift
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.184

Review 3.  Persistent Parasitism: The Adaptive Biology of Malariae and Ovale Malaria.

Authors:  Colin J Sutherland
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2016-07-30

4.  Plasmodium cynomolgi infections in rhesus macaques display clinical and parasitological features pertinent to modelling vivax malaria pathology and relapse infections.

Authors:  Chester Joyner; Alberto Moreno; Esmeralda V S Meyer; Monica Cabrera-Mora; Jessica C Kissinger; John W Barnwell; Mary R Galinski
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Plasmodium malariae and P. ovale genomes provide insights into malaria parasite evolution.

Authors:  Gavin G Rutledge; Ulrike Böhme; Mandy Sanders; Adam J Reid; James A Cotton; Oumou Maiga-Ascofare; Abdoulaye A Djimdé; Tobias O Apinjoh; Lucas Amenga-Etego; Magnus Manske; John W Barnwell; François Renaud; Benjamin Ollomo; Franck Prugnolle; Nicholas M Anstey; Sarah Auburn; Ric N Price; James S McCarthy; Dominic P Kwiatkowski; Chris I Newbold; Matthew Berriman; Thomas D Otto
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Emergence of Nonfalciparum Plasmodium Infection Despite Regular Artemisinin Combination Therapy in an 18-Month Longitudinal Study of Ugandan Children and Their Mothers.

Authors:  Martha Betson; Sarah Clifford; Michelle Stanton; Narcis B Kabatereine; J Russell Stothard
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Characterization of Plasmodium ovale spp. imported from Africa to Henan Province, China.

Authors:  Ruimin Zhou; Suhua Li; Yuling Zhao; Chengyun Yang; Ying Liu; Dan Qian; Hao Wang; Deling Lu; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prospective Clinical and Molecular Evaluation of Potential Plasmodium ovale curtisi and wallikeri Relapses in a High-transmission Setting.

Authors:  Mirjam Groger; Luzia Veletzky; Albert Lalremruata; Chiara Cattaneo; Johannes Mischlinger; Rella Manego Zoleko; Johanna Kim; Anna Klicpera; Elias L Meyer; Daniel Blessborn; Markus Winterberg; Ayola A Adegnika; Selidji T Agnandji; Peter G Kremsner; Benjamin Mordmüller; Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma; Hans-Peter Fuehrer; Michael Ramharter
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Mass screening and treatment on the basis of results of a Plasmodium falciparum-specific rapid diagnostic test did not reduce malaria incidence in Zanzibar.

Authors:  Jackie Cook; Weiping Xu; Mwinyi Msellem; Marlotte Vonk; Beatrice Bergström; Roly Gosling; Abdul-Wahid Al-Mafazy; Peter McElroy; Fabrizio Molteni; Ali K Abass; Issa Garimo; Mahdi Ramsan; Abdullah Ali; Andreas Mårtensson; Anders Björkman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  The Incidence and Differential Seasonal Patterns of Plasmodium vivax Primary Infections and Relapses in a Cohort of Children in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Amanda Ross; Cristian Koepfli; Sonja Schoepflin; Lincoln Timinao; Peter Siba; Thomas Smith; Ivo Mueller; Ingrid Felger; Marcel Tanner
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.