| Literature DB >> 35164806 |
Ruvani W Fonseka1,2,3, Lotus McDougal4, Anita Raj4, Elizabeth Reed5, Rebecka Lundgren4, Lianne Urada4,6, Jay G Silverman4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies from many contexts indicate that proximity to conflict is associated with increased likelihood of intimate partner violence (IPV), and girl child marriage is associated with both proximity to conflict and increased IPV. In this study, we consider whether girl child marriage acts as a mediator of the association between proximity to conflict and IPV in the context of Sri Lanka, which sustained long-term conflict until 2009.Entities:
Keywords: Demographic and Health Survey (DHS); Gender-based violence; Girl child marriage; Intimate partner violence; Mediation analysis; Post-conflict setting; South Asia; Sri Lanka
Year: 2022 PMID: 35164806 PMCID: PMC8842814 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-022-00436-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Confl Health ISSN: 1752-1505 Impact factor: 2.723
Fig. 1Map of Sri Lankan Districts. Adapted from Fonseka RW. Understanding gender-based violence and health in post-conflict Sri Lanka. University of California San Diego; 2021
Fig. 2Measuring whether girl child marriage mediates the relationship between proximity to conflict and past-year intimate partner violence (IPV) in post-conflict Sri Lanka. Legend: aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: 95% confidence interval
Demographic details of currently partnered women aged 18–49 who participated in the 2016 Sri Lankan DHS Domestic Violence module and distribution of past year sexual, physical, and emotional intimate partner violence (IPV) (N = 13,691)
| Total | Past year sexual IPV | Past year physical IPV | Past year emotional IPV | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | n | %^ | n | % | Chi-squared | n | % | Chi-squared | n | % | Chi-squared |
| Total | 13,691 | 100 | 363 | 2 | – | 1290 | 9 | – | 1949 | 13 | – |
| Proximity to conflict | |||||||||||
| Distal | 7603 | 64 | 110 | 1 | < 0.01* | 529 | 7% | < 0.01* | 867 | 11 | < 0.01* |
| Proximal | 3131 | 23 | 60 | 2 | 247 | 8 | 261 | 9 | |||
| Central | 2957 | 13 | 193 | 8 | 514 | 19 | 821 | 29 | |||
| Girl child marriage | |||||||||||
| No | 11,707 | 86 | 265 | 2 | < 0.01* | 967 | 8 | < 0.01* | 1539 | 12 | < 0.01* |
| Yes | 1984 | 14 | 98 | 5 | 323 | 16 | 410 | 19 | |||
| Age^^ | |||||||||||
| 18–29 | 3031 | 22 | 69 | 2 | 0.03* | 276 | 8 | 0.04* | 394 | 12 | < 0.01* |
| 30–39 | 5852 | 43 | 147 | 2 | 543 | 8 | 804 | 13 | |||
| 40–49 | 4808 | 35 | 147 | 3 | 471 | 10 | 751 | 15 | |||
| Education | |||||||||||
| Primary (01–05) or less | 1189 | 8 | 76 | 6 | < 0.01* | 234 | 20 | < 0.01* | 288 | 24 | < 0.01* |
| Secondary (6–12) | 9119 | 66 | 252 | 2 | 919 | 10 | 1303 | 13 | |||
| Higher than Secondary | 3383 | 26 | 35 | 1 | 137 | 4 | 358 | 10 | |||
| Household wealth quintile | |||||||||||
| Lowest | 3090 | 18 | 169 | 5 | < 0.01* | 575 | 19 | < 0.01* | 734 | 22 | < 0.01* |
| Second | 2787 | 20 | 89 | 3 | 276 | 10 | 399 | 14 | |||
| Middle | 2683 | 21 | 42 | 2 | 200 | 7 | 305 | 11 | |||
| Fourth | 2660 | 21 | 33 | 1 | 146 | 6 | 270 | 10 | |||
| Highest | 2471 | 20 | 30 | 1 | 93 | 4 | 241 | 10 | |||
| Parity | |||||||||||
| 0–1 | 4267 | 32 | 62 | 1 | < 0.01* | 276 | 6 | < 0.01* | 475 | 10 | < 0.01* |
| 2 | 5154 | 39 | 123 | 2 | 470 | 9 | 687 | 12 | |||
| 3+ | 4270 | 29 | 178 | 4 | 544 | 12 | 787 | 17 | |||
| Age difference between woman and partner^^ | |||||||||||
| Same or older | 2468 | 18 | 77 | 3 | 0.12 | 283 | 11 | < 0.01* | 397 | 15 | 0.05* |
| 1–5 years | 6712 | 49 | 176 | 2 | 628 | 9 | 911 | 12 | |||
| 6–10 years | 3598 | 27 | 77 | 2 | 285 | 7 | 494 | 13 | |||
| Over 10 years | 913 | 6 | 33 | 3 | 94 | 9 | 147 | 14 | |||
| Religion | |||||||||||
| Buddhism | 8855 | 73 | 135 | 2 | < 0.01* | 585 | 7 | < 0.01* | 922 | 11 | < 0.01* |
| Hinduism | 2327 | 11 | 127 | 6 | 417 | 19 | 624 | 27 | |||
| Islam | 1267 | 9 | 59 | 4 | 132 | 10 | 195 | 15 | |||
| Other | 1242 | 8 | 42 | 3 | 156 | 12 | 208 | 15 | |||
| Urban setting | |||||||||||
| No | 11,510 | 85 | 312 | 2 | 0.85 | 1097 | 9 | 0.56 | 1604 | 13 | < 0.01* |
| Yes | 2181 | 15 | 51 | 2 | 193 | 9 | 345 | 16 | |||
| District^^^ | < 0.01* | < 0.01* | < 0.01* | ||||||||
n values are unweighted, while percent values are weighted
Chi-squared p-values are weighted according to the survey's complex sampling design
^Total percent values are calculated within the same column, while all other percent values are calculated across the same row
^^Age and age difference between woman and partner are presented in cross-tabulations as categorical but were included in regression models as continuous variables
^^^A full list of districts is omitted due to length (see Additional file 1)
*p < 0.05
Logistic regression analyses of the relationship between proximity to conflict, girl child marriage, and past year sexual, physical, and emotional intimate partner violence (IPV) among currently partnered women aged 18–49 who participated in the 2016 Sri Lankan DHS Domestic Violence module (N = 13,691)
| C path (outcome: IPV = yes) | A path (outcome: Child Marriage = yes) | C' and B path (outcome: IPV = yes) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable of interest | aOR | CI | aOR | CI | aOR | CI | |||
| Proximity to conflict | |||||||||
| Distal | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Proximal | 0.34 | 0.09, 1.23 | 0.10 | 1.28 | 0.83, 1.97 | 0.30 | – | – | – |
| Central | 4.19 | 2.08, 8.41 | < 0.01* | 1.89 | 1.22, 2.93 | < 0.01* | 4.03 | 2.00, 8.12 | < 0.01* |
| Girl child marriage | |||||||||
| No | – | – | – | – | – | – | ref | ref | ref |
| Yes | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.55 | 1.15, 2.09 | < 0.01* |
| Proximity to conflict | |||||||||
| Distal | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Proximal | 0.51 | 0.29, 0.91 | 0.02* | 1.28 | 0.83, 1.97 | 0.30 | – | – | – |
| Central | 2.15 | 1.36, 3.41 | < 0.01* | 1.89 | 1.22, 2.93 | < 0.01* | 2.07 | 1.30, 3.30 | < 0.01* |
| Girl child marriage | |||||||||
| No | – | – | – | – | – | – | ref | ref | ref |
| Yes | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.62 | 1.37, 1.93 | < 0.01* |
| Proximity to conflict | |||||||||
| Distal | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref |
| Proximal | 0.31 | 0.18, 0.54 | < 0.01* | 1.28 | 0.83, 1.97 | 0.30 | – | – | – |
| Central | 1.88 | 1.30, 2.70 | < 0.01* | 1.89 | 1.22, 2.93 | < 0.01* | 1.82 | 1.26, 2.63 | < 0.01* |
| Girl child marriage | |||||||||
| No | – | – | – | – | – | – | ref | ref | ref |
| Yes | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.45 | 1.23, 1.71 | < 0.01* |
Regression models included as covariates age, education, household wealth quintile, parity, age difference between woman and partner, religion, urban setting, and district
Confidence intervals and p-values are weighted according to the survey's complex sampling design
aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: 95% confidence interval
*: p < 0.05
Fig. 3Measuring whether girl child marriage mediates the relationship between proximity to conflict (comparing central to distal) and past year sexual, physical, and emotional intimate partner violence (IPV) in post-conflict Sri Lanka. Legend: aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: 95% confidence interval; **:p < 0.01; odds ratios use proximity to conflict = distal as reference group