| Literature DB >> 35164070 |
Jing Zhou1,2, Junlin Zhang1, Shaoli Chen1, Fengqi Zhao1, Lili Qiu2, Zihui Meng2, Li Ding1, Bozhou Wang1, Qing Pan1.
Abstract
Molecular perovskites are promising practicable energetic materials with easy access and outstanding performances. Herein, we reported the first comparative thermal research on energetic molecular perovskite structures of (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)3], (C6H14N2)[Na(ClO4)3], and (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)3] through both calculation and experimental methods with different heating rates such as 2, 5, 10, and 20 °C/min. The peak temperature of thermal decompositions of (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)3] and (C6H14N2) [Na(ClO4)3] were 384 and 354 °C at the heating rate of 10 °C/min, which are lower than that of (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (401 °C). The choice of organic component with larger molecular volume, as well as the replacement of ammonium cation by alkali cation weakened the cubic cage skeletons; meanwhile, corresponding kinetic parameters were calculated with thermokinetics software. The synergistic catalysis thermal decomposition mechanisms of the molecular perovskites were also investigated based on condensed-phase thermolysis/Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy method and DSC-TG-FTIR-MS quadruple technology at different temperatures.Entities:
Keywords: DSC-TG-FTIR-MS quadruple technology; confined effect; decomposition mechanisms; molecular perovskites; thermal research
Year: 2022 PMID: 35164070 PMCID: PMC8840576 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of the energetic molecular perovskites.
Figure 2Comparative DSC (a) and TG (b) experiments on the energetic molecular perovskite structures.
Figure 3DSC experiments under different heating rates of (C6H14N2)[Na(ClO4)3] (a), (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (b) and (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (c); The overlay of fitted and measured curves of (C6H14N2)[Na(ClO4)3] (d), (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (e) and (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (f).
Kinetic parameters of the energetic molecular perovskites.
| Dynamic Analysis Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (C6H14N2) | Kamal-Sourour autocatalytic model (KS) | |||||
| Activation Energy | LogA | React order n | Activation Energy | Log(AutocatA) | Autocat Power m | |
| 173.9 | 12.5 | 2.4 | 218.5 | 4.8 | 1.7 | |
| (C6H14N2) | nth order autocatalytic model (Cn) | |||||
| Activation Energy | LogA | React order n | Log(AutocatA) | |||
| 207.5 | 13.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | |||
| (C6H14ON2) | nth order model (Fn) | |||||
| Activation Energy | LogA | React order n | ||||
| 221.7 | 15.6 | 0.5 | ||||
Note: A: pre-exponential constant; Autocat: autocatalytic; Ea: activation energy; n: react order.
Figure 4In situ FTIR spectroscopy experiments of (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (A), (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (B), (C6H14N2)[Na(ClO4)3] (C), DABCO (D) and DABCO-OH (E) at different temperatures.
Figure 5The mass spectra for (C6H14N2)[Na(ClO4)3] (a), (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)3], (b) and (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)3] (c) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.