| Literature DB >> 35164032 |
Wesam S Shehab1, Maged A Aziz1, Nourhan Kh R Elhoseni1, Mohamed G Assy1, Magda H Abdellattif2, Eman O Hamed1.
Abstract
On our way to discovering and developing compounds that have an antioxidant impact compared to ascorbic acid and other biological activities, we designed, synthesized, and evaluated a new series of heterocyclic moieties drugs (1-11) as antioxidants and antimicrobial agents. As starting moieties, these new candidates were derived from two promising heterocyclic compounds, imidazoldin-4-one and thiazol-4-one. Firstly, diphenylimidazol 1 was obtained because of the cyclo condensation one-pot ternary reaction of urea, aniline, and chloroacetic acid under thermal conditions. Out of this starting compound, we could design and create new vital rings such as purine and triazine as in compounds 5 and 6, respectively. Secondly, the start thiazole derivative 7 was obtained from the intermolecular cyclization of thiourea, chloroacetic acid, p-nitobezaldehyde in the presence of sodium acetate. We synthesized various derivatives from this second starting compound 7 by being subjected to different reagents such as aniline, phenylenediamine, phenylhydrazine, and barbituric acid to yield 8, 9, 10, and 11, respectively. Using ascorbic acid as the standard compound, the pharmacological testing for antioxidant activity assessment of the produced derivatives was evaluated against ABTS (2,20-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid). Candidate 6 exhibited the best activity as an antioxidant agent compared to ascorbic acid as a reference compound. Moreover, all compounds were evaluated as antimicrobial agents against a series of bacteria and fungi. Among all synthesized compounds, compound 6 achieved high efficiency against two types of fungi and four kinds of bacteria, as Clotrimazole and Ampicillin were used as the reference agents, respectively. All chemical structures of the novel synthesized candidates were unequivocally elucidated and confirmed utilizing spectroscopical and elemental investigations.Entities:
Keywords: ABTS assay; antimicrobial agents; antioxidant activity; azabene; imidazolothiazole; imidazotriazine; molecular docking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35164032 PMCID: PMC8840376 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1The rationale of the newly synthesized imidazole and thiazol derivatives using molecular association.
Scheme 1Synthesis and cyclization of imidazole 1.
Scheme 2Synthesis of 4-diphenyl-2H-imidazo[4,5-d] thiazole-2,5(4H)-diimine by two different methods and reagents.
Scheme 3Synthesis of purine derivatives.
Scheme 4Synthesis of fused system imidazotriazine 6.
Scheme 5The proposed mechanism for the formation of compound 6.
Scheme 6Synthesis of thiazole ring as the start for the second approach.
Scheme 7Synthesis of different fused systems composed of imidazole, pyridine, and pyrimidine rings with thiazole ring.
Antioxidant assay for the tested new compounds.
| Compounds | Absorbance of Samples | % Inhibition |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.227 | 54.6% |
|
| 0.136 | 72.8% |
|
| 0.062 | 87.6% |
|
| 0.081 | 83.8% |
|
| 0.058 | 88.4% |
|
| 0.500 | 0 |
Figure 2Antioxidant activity screening assay.
In vitro antibacterial and antifungal screening of the newly synthesized compounds.
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter of Inhibition Zone | % Activity Index | Diameter of Inhibition Zone | % Activity Index | Diameter of Inhibition Zone | % | Diameter of Inhibition Zone | % Activity Index | Diameter of | % | Diameter of | % | |
|
| 3 | 12 | NA | ---- | 2 | 18 | NA | ---- | 2 | 8 | 3 | 15 |
|
| 10 | 40 | 3 | 25 | 5 | 45.5 | 4 | 17.4 | 7 | 28 | 6 | 30 |
|
| NA | ---- | NA | ---- | NA | ---- | NA | ---- | NA | ---- | 2 | 10 |
|
| 20 | 80 | 11 | 91.7 | 10 | 90.9 | 9 | 39.1 | 12 | 48 | 15 | 75 |
|
| 25 | 100 | 12 | 100 | 11 | 100 | 20 | 100 | NA | ---- | NA | ---- |
|
| NA | ---- | NA | ---- | NA | ---- | NA | ---- | 25 | 100 | 20 | 100 |
NA: This compound has No Action or Negligible Action on this specific type of microorganism.
The binding scores, RMSD values, receptor interactions, distances, and energies of our promising candidates (2, 3, 5, and 6) were recorded compared to the docked ascorbic acid as a reference standard inside the binding pocket of cytochrome c peroxidase.
| Ligand | Docking Score | RMSD | Recepitor Interaction | Distance | E (Kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −4.49 | 0.90 | Gly-41/H-donor | 2.97 | −3.0 |
|
| −6.47 | 1.52 | Ser-185/H-donor | 3.03 | −0.6 |
|
| −5.49 | 1.65 | Tyr-42/H-acceptor | 3.28 | −1.2 |
|
| −5.79 | 1.37 | Gly-41/H-donor | 2.68 | −3.9 |
|
| −5.26 | 0.80 | Lys-179/H-donor | 3.09 | −0.7 |
2D and 3D receptor interactions and receptor positioning of the most significant potential candidates (2, 3, 5, and 6) compared to the docked ascorbic acid as a reference standard inside the binding pocket of cytochrome c peroxidase.
| Molecule | 2D Receptor Interaction | 3D Receptor Interaction | 3D Receptor Positioning |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The binding scores, RMSD values, receptor interactions, distances, and energies of our promising candidates (2, 3, 5, and 6) were recorded compared to the docked ascorbic acid as a reference standard inside the binding pocket of Streptococcus pneumoniae hyaluronate lyase enzyme.
| Ligand | Docking Score | RMSD | Recepitor Interaction | Distance | E (Kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −5.41 | 1.075 | Trp-292/H-pi | 3.79 | −0.8 |
|
| −5.40 | 0.65 | Asn-290/H-donor | 2.97 | −3.0 |
|
| −7.13 | 1.70 | Arg-466/H-acceptor | 4.48 | −1.2 |
|
| −5.76 | 0.89 | Tyr-408/H-acceptor | 3.09 | −1.2 |
|
| −4.54 | 1.21 | His-399/H-acceptor | 3.40 | −0.9 |
2D and 3D receptor interactions and receptor positioning of the most significant potential candidates (2, 3, 5, and 6) compared to the docked ascorbic acid as a reference standard inside the binding pocket of Streptococcus pneumoniae hyaluronate lyase.
| Molecule | 2D Receptor Interaction | 3D Receptor Interaction | 3D Receptor Positioning |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|