| Literature DB >> 35163976 |
Mario Nikola Mužek1, Franko Burčul2, Dario Omanović3, Azra Đulović4, Sandra Svilović5, Ivica Blažević4.
Abstract
The effects of copper addition, from various adsorbents, on the accumulation ability and glucosinolate content of cultivated rocket were studied. Different adsorbents (zeolite NaX, egg shells, substrate, fly ash) were treated with copper(II) solution with an adsorption efficiency of 98.36, 96.67, 51.82 and 39.13%, respectively. The lowest copper content and the highest total glucosinolate content (44.37 μg/g DW and 4269.31 µg/g DW, respectively) were detected in the rocket grown in the substrate with the addition of a substrate spiked with copper(II) ions. Rocket grown in the fly ash-substrate mixture showed an increase in copper content (84.98 μg/g DW) and the lowest total glucosinolate content (2545.71 µg/g DW). On the other hand, when using the egg shells-substrate mixture, the rocket copper content increased (113.34 μg/g DW) along with the total GSLs content (3780.03 µg/g DW), indicating the influence of an adsorbent type in addition to the copper uptake. The highest copper content of 498.56 μg/g DW was detected in the rocket watered with copper(II) solution with a notable decrease in the glucosinolate content, i.e., 2699.29 µg/g DW. According to these results rocket can be considered as a copper accumulator plant.Entities:
Keywords: Rocket (Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav.); copper; glucosinolates; phytoremediation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35163976 PMCID: PMC8838321 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Experimental data obtained after 10 days of adsorption process.
| Adsorbent/Concentration | Zeolite NaX | Egg Shells | Substrate | Fly Ash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.13 | 0.27 | 3.83 | 4.84 | |
| 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.16 | |
| 24.85 | 24.40 | 13.09 | 9.85 | |
| Adsorption efficiency (%) | 98.36 | 96.67 | 51.82 | 39.13 |
c10 is the remaining concentration of copper(II) ions in the solution; q10 is the amount of the copper retained on the adsorbent.
Heavy metal content in the cultivated rocket (whole plant).
| Heavy Metal (μg/g DW) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | Cd | Mo | Mn | Fe | Co | Ni | Zn | |
| Compo Sana substrate | 10.19 ± 0.02 a | 0.05 ± 0.00 a | 0.01 ± 0.00 a | 19.29 ± 0.04 a | 263.31 ± 0.85 a | 0.13 ± 0.00 a | 0.92 ± 0.00 a | 15.41 ± 0.02 a |
| Control | 12.19 ± 0.16 b | 0.43 ± 0.00 b | 0.25 ± 0.00 b | 227.48 ± 1.99 b | 49.19 ± 0.84 b | 0.04 ± 0.00 b | 1.66 ± 0.04 b | 239.96 ± 2.21 b |
| Substrate * | 44.37 ± 0.49 c | 0.16 ± 0.00 c | 0.18 ± 0.00 c | 88.35 ± 0.77 c | 45.23 ± 0.28 c | 0.03 ± 0.00 c | 0.62 ± 0.00 c | 123.79 ± 1.33 c |
| Fly ash * | 84.98 ± 0.39 d | 0.14 ± 0.00 d | 0.48 ± 0.02 d | 79.13 ± 0.34 d | 82.49 ± 0.72 d | 0.12 ± 0.00 d | 1.82 ± 0.00 d | 108.86 ± 1.18 d |
| Egg shells * | 113.34 ± 0.85 e | 0.11 ± 0.00 e | 0.23 ± 0.01 e | 66.45 ± 0.83 e | 29.88 ± 0.29 e | 0.03 ± 0.00 c | 1.16 ± 0.01 e | 74.62 ± 0.38 e |
| NaX * | 156.19 ± 1.54 f | 0.07 ± 0.00 f | 0.26 ± 0.01 b | 58.86 ± 1.05 f | 72.45 ± 0.34 f | 0.05 ± 0.00 e | 0.88 ± 0.01 f | 78.99 ± 0.64 f |
| CuSO4 solution | 498.56 ± 1.77 g | 0.60 ± 0.00 g | 0.31 ± 0.00 f | 185.68 ± 0.41 g | 52.46 ± 0.31 g | 0.04 ± 0.00 b | 0.70 ± 0.00 g | 45.03 ± 0.63 g |
* Control—plant cultivated in pure Compo Sana substrate and watered with tap water; * Compo Sana substrate mixed with various adsorbents cf. Table 1 and watered with tap water; CuSO4 solution—plant cultivated in pure Compo Sana substrate and watered with copper(II) sulfate solution; DW—dry weight. Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different superscript letters a–g in the same column denote statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between samples.
Figure 1Morphological appearance of the rocket (Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav.) cultivated in differently prepared substrate. Control—plant cultivated in pure Compo Sana substrate and watered with tap water; * Compo Sana substrate mixed with various adsorbents cf. Table 1 and watered with tap water; CuSO4 solution—plant cultivated in pure Compo Sana substrate and watered with copper(II) sulfate solution.
Figure 2Structures of the glucosinolates identified in the rocket: 1—4-(methylsulfinyl)butyl GSL (glucoraphanin); 2—4-(β-d-glucopyranosyldisulfanyl)butyl GSL (diglucothiobeinin); 3—3-(methylsulfanyl)propyl GSL (glucoibervirin); 4—4-(methylsulfanyl)butyl GSL (glucoerucin); 5—4-methoxyindol-3-ylmethyl GSL (4-methoxyglucobrassicin); 6—dimeric 4-mercaptobutyl GSL; 7—1,4-dimethoxyindol-3-ylmethyl GSL (1,4-dimethoxyglucobrassicin); 8—10-(methylsulfinyl)decyl GSL (glucocamelinin). Chromatograms were given in Figure S1.
Glucosinolate content in the cultivated rocket (whole plant).
| Glucosinolates (μg/g DW) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Total | |
| [M + Na]+ | 380 | 544 | 350 | 364 | 421 | 675 | 451 | 464 | |
| Control | 529.41 ± 5.24 a | 560.91 ± 21.74 a | 3.54 ± 0.00 | 320.62 ± 1.79 a | tr | 1191.66 ± 16.13 a | 22.01 ± 1.51 a | 889.05 ± 4.51 a | 3517.20 ± 50.92 a |
| Substrate * | 421.63 ± 7.94 b | 410.55 ± 0.18 b | tr | 1110.86 ± 11.97 b | tr | 1367.48 ± 6.72 b | 31.02 ± 0.24 b | 927.77 ± 7.36 b | 4269.31 ± 34.41 b |
| Fly ash * | 296.42 ± 1.16 c | 437.12 ± 15.95 c | tr | 252.41 ± 0.45 c | tr | 563.44 ± 0.67 c | 9.59 ± 0.09 c | 986.73 ± 0.73 c | 2545.71 ± 19.05 c |
| Egg shells * | 675.59 ± 12.81 d | 624.30 ± 1.63 d | tr | 482.70 ± 0.37 d | tr | 885.15 ± 5.21 d | 18.42 ± 1.47 d | 1093.87 ± 4.54 d | 3780.03 ± 26.03 d |
| NaX * | 537.29 ± 1.62 a | 307.61 ± 2.51 e | tr | 604.96 ± 0.11 e | tr | 1176.03 ± 2.85 e | 21.78 ± 0.05 a | 567.23 ± 7.05 e | 3214.90 ± 14.19 e |
| CuSO4 solution | 455.36 ± 3.90 e | 332.83 ± 6.52 f | tr | 593.34 ± 8.20 f | tr | 651.65 ± 7.38 f | 16.51 ± 0.14 e | 649.60 ± 0.94 f | 2699.29 ± 27.08 f |
* Control—plant cultivated in pure Compo Sana substrate and watered with tap water; * Compo Sana substrate mixed with various adsorbents cf. Table 1 and watered with tap water; CuSO4 solution—plant cultivated in pure Compo Sana substrate and watered with copper(II) sulfate solution; tr < 0.1 μmol/g DW; DW—dry weight; [M + Na]+, sodium adduct of desulfoglucosinolate; 1—glucoraphanin; 2—diglucothiobeinin; 3—glucoibervirin; 4—glucoerucin; 5—4-methoxyglucobrassicin; 6—dimeric 4-mercaptobutyl GSL; 7—1,4-dimethoxyglucobrassicin; 8—glucocamelinin. Chromatograms were given in Figure S1. Results are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different superscript letters a−f in the same column denote statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between samples.