| Literature DB >> 35162612 |
Ronnel C Nolos1,2,3, Christine Joy M Agarin4, Maria Ysabel R Domino1,3, Pauline B Bonifacio1,3, Eduardo B Chan5, Doreen R Mascareñas6, Delia B Senoro1,3,7.
Abstract
This paper investigated the health risks due to metal concentrations in soil and vegetables from the island province in the Philippines and the potential ecological risks. The concentrations of Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn in vegetables and soil in six municipalities of the province were analyzed using the Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) Perkin Elmer Optima 8000. It was recorded that all metal concentrations in the soil, except for Cd, exceeded the soil quality standard (SQS). The concentration of Fe and Mn was highest among other metals. The Nemerow synthetical pollution index (Pn) in all soil samples was under Class V which means severe pollution level. Likewise, the risk index (RI) of soil ranged from high to very high pollution risk. Most of the metal concentrations in the vegetables analyzed also exceeded the maximum permissible limit (MPL). All health hazard indices (HHIs) were less than 1, which means potential low non-carcinogenic risk to human population by vegetable consumption. However, it was found that concentration of Cr and Ni in vegetables is a potential health hazard having concentrations exceeding the maximum threshold limit. A 75% temporary consumption reduction of bitter melon, eggplant, sweet potato tops, and string beans produced from two municipalities may be helpful in reducing exposure to target metals. Additional studies are needed to confirm this recommendation. Spatial correlation analysis showed that six out of target metals had datasets that were more spatially clustered than would be expected. The recorded data are useful for creation of research direction, and aid in developing strategies for remediation, tools, and programs for improving environmental and vegetable quality monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: health risks; island; metals; pollution; risk assessment; soil; vegetables
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35162612 PMCID: PMC8835370 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031587
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Map of the study area and locations of sampling sites.
The grading standards for pollution indices [44].
| Class of Pollution | I | II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ≤1.0 | 1.0–2.0 | 2.0–3.0 | 3.0–5.0 | >5.0 |
|
| ≤0.7 | 0.7–1.0 | 1.0–2.0 | 2.0–3.0 | >3.0 |
| Pollution level | Clean | Warning | Light | Intermediate | Severe |
| Risk index | <150 | 150–300 | 300–600 | 600–1200 | >1200 |
| Pollution risk | Low | Moderate | Considerable | High | Very high |
| (3) |
Mean concentrations of metals in soil () with soil quality standards (SQS), n = 90.
| Location | Metal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Cr | Cu | Fe | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | |
| Boac | 0 | 854 ±365 | 9159 ± 10,727 | 772,972 ± 116,476 | 25,597 ± 20,945 | 567 ± 285 | 664 ± 333 | 3734 ± 2083 |
| Buenavista | 0 | 1695 ± 921 | 2090 ± 827 | 759,560 ± 325,617 | 60,550 ± 52,526 | 1016 ± 954 | 930 ± 636 | 3734 ± 2083 |
| Gasan | 0 | 2466 ± 1380 | 1711 ± 358 | 1,083,607 ± 616,615 | 29,238 ± 9882 | 3216 ± 3412 | 393 ± 108 | 2291 ± 494 |
| Mogpog | 0 | 862 ± 143 | 17,712 ± 15,394 | 783,457 ± 133,191 | 31,893 ± 9421 | 536 ± 109 | 1291 ± 431 | 6161 ± 2962 |
| Sta. Cruz | 0 | 1257 ± 917 | 3506 ± 857 | 1,030,753 ± 197,825 | 50,522 ± 38,289 | 898 ± 830 | 645 ± 334 | 2760 ± 1014 |
| Torrijos | 0 | 1409 ± 533 | 2807 ± 1328 | 762,505 ± 188,812 | 38,298 ± 15,042 | 722 ± 463 | 682 ± 203 | 2790 ± 876 |
| SQS | 0.15 1 | 80 1 | 45 1 | NA | 100 2 | 45 1 | 55 1 | 70 1 |
1 Chen et al., 2018, 2 Semenkov et al., 2020.
Trend of metal concentrations in the soil across the province.
| Location | Metals in Soil |
|---|---|
| Boac | Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Ni > Pb > Cd |
| Buenavista | Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Pb > Ni > Cd |
| Gasan | Fe > Mn > Cu > Zn > Cr > Ni > Pb > Cd |
| Mogpog | Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Ni > Pb > Cd |
| Sta. Cruz | Fe > Mn > Cu > Zn > Cr > Ni > Pb > Cd |
| Torrijos | Fe > Mn > Cu > Zn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Cd |
Figure 2The single-factor pollution index () of soil per municipality of the island province. The of (a) Cr, (b) Cu, (c) Mn, (d) Ni, (e) Pb, and (f) Zn in soil from all municipalities across the province.
Figure 3Boxplot of (a) the Nemerow synthetical pollution index and (b) risk index of metal in soil.
Figure 4Metal concentrations in vegetables by municipality in the island province. The concentration of Cd (a) in all vegetables from BV and G was above MPL. The concentration of Cr (b) in vegetables from BV and G was above the MPL. The Cu concentration (c) in all vegetables was below MPL in all six municipalities. The Fe concentration (d) in all vegetables of the six municipalities except for the sweet potato tops of G was below MPL. The Mn concentration (e) in all vegetables from the six municipalities except the eggplant from B and M was beyond MPL. The Ni concentration (f) in string beans from BV and G and the sweet potato tops from Gasan exceeded the MPL. The Pb concentration (g) in all vegetables from BV, G, S, and T was beyond MPL. The Zn concentration (h) in all vegetables from the six municipalities except for the eggplant of B was above the MPL.
Distribution trend of metal concentration in vegetables.
| Location | Vegetable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| String Beans | Sweet Potato Tops | Bitter Melon | Eggplant | |
| Boac | Zn > Fe > Mn > Cu > Pb > Cr > Ni > Cd | Fe > Zn > Mn > Ni > Cu > Pb > Cd > Cr | Zn > Fe > Cu > Mn > Ni > Pb > Cd > Cr | Zn > Fe > Cu > Mn > Ni > Pb > Cd > Cr |
| Buenavista | Zn > Fe > Mn > Cu > Pb > Cr > Ni > Cd | Fe > Zn > Mn > Ni > Cu > Pb > Cd > Cr | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Pb > Cd > Cr | Cu > Mn > Ni > Fe > Pb > Cd > Zn > Cr |
| Gasan | Zn > Fe > Mn > Cu > Pb > Cr > Ni > Cd | Fe > Zn > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd |
| Mogpog | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Fe > Zn > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd |
| Sta. Cruz | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd |
| Torrijos | Zn > Ni > Fe > Mn > Cr > Pb > Cu > Cd | Fe > Zn > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Mn > Ni > Fe > Cu > Cr > Pb > Cd | Zn > Fe > Mn > Ni > Cr > Cu > Pb > Cd |
The estimated daily intake (EDI) of metals through vegetables.
| Location | Vegetable | Cd | Cr | Cu | Fe | Mn | Zn | Ni | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boac | String beans | 3.85 × 10−8 | 5.67 × 10−9 | 1.92 × 10−4 | 5.10 × 10−4 | 2.82 × 10−4 | 1.73 × 10−3 | 6.00 × 10−9 | 1.28 × 10−7 |
| Sweet potato tops | 4.29 × 10−8 | 6.31 × 10−9 | 2.39 × 10−4 | 1.31 × 10−3 | 3.31 × 10−4 | 1.26 × 10−3 | 6.68 × 10−9 | 1.43 × 10−7 | |
| Bitter melon | 4.09 × 10−8 | 6.02 × 10−9 | 1.48 × 10−4 | 4.67 × 10−4 | 1.71 × 10−4 | 1.85 × 10−3 | 6.37 × 10−9 | 1.36 × 10−7 | |
| Eggplant | 7.71 × 10−8 | 1.13 × 10−8 | 2.20 × 10−4 | 6.76 × 10−5 | 1.53 × 10−4 | 1.85 × 10−8 | 1.20 × 10−8 | 2.57 × 10−7 | |
| Buena-vista | String beans | 4.83 × 10−5 | 7.34 × 10−5 | 1.20 × 10−4 | 6.95 × 10−4 | 3.32 × 10−4 | 2.01 × 10−3 | 1.21 × 10−4 | 6.31 × 10−5 |
| Sweet potato tops | 5.27 × 10−5 | 8.44 × 10−5 | 1.56 × 10−4 | 4.12 × 10−3 | 6.20 × 10−4 | 1.45 × 10−3 | 6.42 × 10−5 | 6.55 × 10−5 | |
| Bitter melon | 5.05 × 10−5 | 7.72 × 10−5 | 1.83 × 10−4 | 4.80 × 10−4 | 1.84 × 10−4 | 2.10 × 10−3 | 6.25 × 10−5 | 6.22 × 10−5 | |
| Eggplant | 9.56 × 10−5 | 1.44 × 10−4 | 2.64 × 10−4 | 6.42 × 10−4 | 4.27 × 10−4 | 1.65 × 10−3 | 1.09 × 10−4 | 1.17 × 10−4 | |
| Gasan | String beans | 4.77 × 10−5 | 7.33 × 10−5 | 1.55 × 10−4 | 7.04 × 10−4 | 3.77 × 10−4 | 2.31 × 10−3 | 1.47 × 10−4 | 6.07 × 10−5 |
| Sweet potato tops | 5.31 × 10−5 | 1.09 × 10−4 | 2.00 × 10−4 | 7.31 × 10−3 | 5.03 × 10−4 | 1.85 × 10−3 | 1.29 × 10−4 | 7.72 × 10−5 | |
| Bitter melon | 5.08 × 10−5 | 7.79 × 10−5 | 1.11 × 10−4 | 5.34 × 10−4 | 4.20 × 10−4 | 1.69 × 10−3 | 8.74 × 10−5 | 6.42 × 10−5 | |
| Eggplant | 9.86 × 10−5 | 1.46 × 10−4 | 3.14 × 10−4 | 8.35 × 10−4 | 4.10 × 10−4 | 3.16 × 10−3 | 1.37 × 10−4 | 1.38 × 10−4 | |
| Mogpog | String beans | 1.32 × 10−6 | 5.67 × 10−9 | 1.49 × 10−4 | 6.48 × 10−4 | 1.76 × 10−4 | 1.64 × 10−3 | 6.00 × 10−9 | 1.28 × 10−7 |
| Sweet potato tops | 4.29 × 10−8 | 6.31 × 10−9 | 2.93 × 10−4 | 3.60 × 10−3 | 3.44 × 10−4 | 1.55 × 10−3 | 6.68 × 10−9 | 1.43 × 10−7 | |
| Bitter melon | 4.09 × 10−8 | 6.02 × 10−9 | 1.84 × 10−4 | 4.22 × 10−4 | 1.31 × 10−4 | 2.13 × 10−3 | 6.37 × 10−9 | 1.36 × 10−7 | |
| Eggplant | 7.71 × 10−8 | 1.13 × 10−8 | 3.76 × 10−4 | 4.12 × 10−4 | 3.92 × 10−5 | 2.32 × 10−3 | 1.20 × 10−8 | 2.57 × 10−7 | |
| Sta. Cruz | String beans | 3.85 × 10−8 | 5.92 × 10−6 | 1.81 × 10−4 | 5.77 × 10−4 | 2.40 × 10−4 | 2.90 × 10−3 | 9.90 × 10−6 | 1.23 × 10−5 |
| Sweet potato tops | 4.29 × 10−8 | 9.57 × 10−6 | 1.46 × 10−4 | 8.31 × 10−4 | 3.37 × 10−4 | 1.85 × 10−3 | 3.53 × 10−6 | 2.73 × 10−5 | |
| Bitter melon | 4.09 × 10−8 | 6.04 × 10−6 | 8.89 × 10−5 | 4.51 × 10−4 | 1.26 × 10−4 | 1.55 × 10−3 | 1.49 × 10−5 | 2.76 × 10−6 | |
| Eggplant | 7.71 × 10−8 | 1.79 × 10−5 | 3.20 × 10−4 | 5.25 × 10−4 | 4.21 × 10−4 | 1.93 × 10−3 | 4.59 × 10−5 | 3.29 × 10−6 | |
| Torrijos | String beans | 3.85 × 10−8 | 8.88 × 10−6 | 1.35 × 10−4 | 7.22 × 10−4 | 3.67 × 10−4 | 2.36 × 10−3 | 1.08 × 10−5 | 2.88 × 10−6 |
| Sweet potato tops | 4.29 × 10−8 | 9.51 × 10−6 | 1.30 × 10−4 | 1.64 × 10−3 | 4.66 × 10−4 | 1.80 × 10−3 | 5.25 × 10−6 | 3.42 × 10−6 | |
| Bitter melon | 4.09 × 10−8 | 8.17 × 10−6 | 9.69 × 10−5 | 5.26 × 10−4 | 1.88 × 10−4 | 1.66 × 10−3 | 6.60 × 10−6 | 4.07 × 10−6 | |
| Eggplant | 1.55 × 10−5 | 1.89 × 10−4 | 3.86 × 10−4 | 2.68 × 10−4 | 1.76 × 10−3 | 3.76 × 10−6 | 8.24 × 10−6 |
Figure 5Contribution of vegetables to the average estimated daily intake (EDI) of metals.
Figure 6Potential health hazard index (HHI) by ingestion of vegetables from Marinduque.
Target cancer risk due to the consumption of vegetables with elevated heavy metal concentrations.
| Location | Cr | Cd | Ni | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boac | 1.47 × 10−8 | 7.57 × 10−8 | 5.28 × 10−8 | 5.65 × 10−9 |
| Buenavista | 1.89 × 10−4 1 | 9.39 × 10−5 | 6.08 × 10−4 1 | 2.62 × 10−6 |
| Gasan | 2.03 × 10−4 1 | 9.51 × 10−5 | 8.51 × 10−4 1 | 2.89 × 10−6 |
| Mogpog | 1.47 × 10−8 | 5.62 × 10−7 | 5.28 × 10−8 | 5.65 × 10−9 |
| Sta. Cruz | 1.97 × 10−5 | 7.57 × 10−8 | 1.26 × 10−4 1 | 3.87 × 10−7 |
| Torrijos | 2.10 × 10−5 | 6.20 × 10−8 | 4.49 × 10−5 | 1.58 × 10−7 |
1 Exceeded the maximum threshold value () for the risk of developing cancer.
The target cancer risk at 75% reduction of vegetable consumption.
| Location | Cr | Cd | Ni | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boac | 2.96 × 10−9 | 1.53 × 10−8 | 1.06 × 10−8 | 1.14 × 10−9 |
| Buenavista | 4.73 × 10−5 1 | 2.35 × 10−5 | 1.52 × 10−4 1 | 6.55 × 10−7 |
| Gasan | 5.08 × 10−5 1 | 2.38 × 10−5 | 2.13 × 10−4 1 | 7.22 × 10−7 |
| Mogpog | 8.80 × 10−9 | 3.37 × 10−7 | 3.17 × 10−8 | 3.39 × 10−9 |
| Sta. Cruz | 4.93 × 10−6 | 1.89 × 10−8 | 3.15 × 10−51 | 9.68 × 10−8 |
| Torrijos | 5.26 × 10−6 | 1.55 × 10−8 | 1.12 × 10−5 | 3.96 × 10−8 |
1 Exceeded the maximum threshold value () for the risk of developing cancer.
Correlation matrix of metals in the soil.
| Metals | Cr | Fe | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | 1 | 0.600 | 0.131 | 0.917 ** | −0.602 | −0.640 | −0.708 |
| Fe | 1 | −0.060 | 0.746 * | −0.624 | −0.555 | −0.395 | |
| Mn | 1 | −0.194 | 0.165 | −0.142 | −0.457 | ||
| Ni | 1 | −0.627 | −0.535 | −0.478 | |||
| Pb | 1 | 0.940 ** | 0.761 * | ||||
| Zn | 0.921 ** | ||||||
| Cu | 1 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).
Figure 7Cluster analysis of metals in soil across the province.
Correlation matrix of metals in the vegetables.
| Metals | Cd | Cr | Fe | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 1 | 0.986 ** | 0.303 | 0.439 * | 0.387 | 0.977 ** | 0.082 | −0.139 |
| Cr | 1 | 0.409 * | 0.502 * | 0.462 * | 0.977 ** | 0.104 | −0.150 | |
| Fe | 1 | 0.629 ** | 0.605 ** | 0.325 | 0.014 | 0.311 | ||
| Mn | 1 | 0.852 ** | 0.443 * | 0.274 | 0.031 | |||
| Ni | 1 | 0.399 | 0.168 | 0.002 | ||||
| Pb | 1 | 0.077 | −0.106 | |||||
| Zn | 1 | 0.113 | ||||||
| Cu | 1 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
The spatial autocorrelation and its interpretation.
| Metals | Media | Moran’s I | Z-Score | Remarks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Soil | - | - | - | - |
| Vegetables 1 | 0.668301 | 2.857647 | 0.004269 | There is <1% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. | |
| Cr | Soil 1 | 0.600711 | 3.66462 | 0.000248 | There is <1% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. |
| Vegetables 1 | 0.700762 | 3.002888 | 0.002674 | There is <1% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. | |
| Cu | Soil 2 | 0.157930 | 1.323145 | 0.185787 | The pattern does not appear to be significantly different than random. |
| Vegetables 2 | 0.313179 | 1.500966 | 0.133364 | The pattern does not appear to be significantly different than random. | |
| Fe | Soil 2 | −0.078156 | −0.290135 | 0.771713 | The pattern does not appear to be significantly different than random. |
| Vegetables 2 | −0.063573 | −0.101530 | 0.919130 | The pattern does not appear to be significantly different than random. | |
| Mn | Soil 2 | 0.010371 | 0.284159 | 0.776288 | The pattern does not appear to be significantly different than random. |
| Vegetables 1 | 0.411650 | 1.878665 | 0.06029 | There is <10% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. | |
| Ni | Soil 1 | 0.517934 | 4.732331 | 0.000002 | There is <1% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. |
| Vegetables 1 | 0.591938 | 2.662094 | 0.007766 | There is <1% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. | |
| Pb | Soil 1 | 0.300678 | 1.957617 | 0.050275 | There is <10% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. |
| Vegetables 1 | 0.742895 | 3.158990 | 0.001583 | There is <1% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance. | |
| Zn | Soil 1 | 0.339623 | 2.150663 | 0.031503 | There is <5% likelihood that this clustered pattern could be the result of random chance |
| Vegetables 2 | −0.210062 | −0.720262 | 0.471363 | The pattern does not appear to be significantly different than random. |
1 Reject null hypothesis, dataset is more spatially clustered than would be expected. 2 Spatial distribution of feature values is the result of random processes.