| Literature DB >> 35162386 |
Xiaoying Zhong1,2, Guanghai Liu3, Peng Chen4, Kaili Ke5, Ruhe Xie3.
Abstract
Based on the panel data of 285 prefecture-level cities and above in China from 2005 to 2019, this paper takes the "Broadband China" pilot policy as a quasi-natural experiment and evaluates the impact of Internet development on urban eco-efficiency (symbolized by the "Broadband China" policy) by constructing multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) and spatial DID models. Results show that: the "Broadband China" pilot policy significantly improves the urban eco-efficiency: the eco-efficiency in pilot cities is about 16.8% higher than that in other cities. The results remain consistent after testing for robustness, including using estimation methods, excluding the sample of key cities, changing core explanatory variables, and introducing instrumental variables. Next, the influence of the "Broadband China" pilot policy on eco-efficiency is characterized by significant regional heterogeneity: Internet development significantly improves the eco-efficiency in the central, eastern and northeastern regions that are economically more developed and not resource-dependent. In contrast, this effect is not obvious in the western region that is economically less developed and resource-dependent. Moreover, the influencing mechanism of Internet development on eco-efficiency suggests that the "Broadband China" strategy boosts urban eco-efficiency by increasing the Internet penetration rate, improving technological innovation capacity, and upgrading the industrial structure. In addition, results from the spatial DID models indicate that the "Broadband China" pilot policy improves the eco-efficiency in local cities and significantly enhances that in neighboring cities. Based on this, this paper puts forward some suggestions regarding promoting new network infrastructure construction and differentiating development policies to fit local conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Internet; difference-in-difference method; eco-efficiency; “Broadband China” pilot policy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35162386 PMCID: PMC8834918 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Super-efficiency SBM model input/output indicators.
| First-Level Indicator | Second-Level Indicator | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Resource consumption | Energy consumption | Total electricity consumption (KWh) |
| Water consumption | Total water use (ten thousand ton) | |
| Land consumption | Built-up urban area (square kilometer) | |
| Desirable output | GDP | Gross domestic product (100 million yuan) |
| Undesirable output | Wastewater discharged | The volume of industrial wastewater discharged (ten thousand ton) |
| SO2 emissions | The volume of industrial SO2 emissions (ton) | |
| Smoke (dust) emissions | The volume of industrial smoke (dust) emissions (ton) |
Descriptive statistics of variables.
| Variable | Obs | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted variable |
| 4275 | −1.6744 | 1.1154 | −7.2811 | 0.2875 |
| Explanatory variable |
| 4275 | 0.1273 | 0.3333 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Instrumental variable |
| 4275 | 0.6768 | 0.7542 | 0.0013 | 3.8138 |
| Influential mechanism variable |
| 4275 | 0.1671 | 0.1827 | 0.0013 | 3.6635 |
|
| 4275 | 0.9191 | 0.5228 | 0.0943 | 9.4822 | |
|
| 4275 | 0.3663 | 1.0161 | 0.0002 | 16.6609 | |
| Controlled variable |
| 4275 | 15.8927 | 1.0135 | 12.8061 | 19.3892 |
|
| 4275 | 5.7297 | 0.9161 | 1.5476 | 7.9227 | |
|
| 4275 | 0.0639 | 0.1038 | 0.0000 | 1.5383 | |
|
| 4275 | 1.0844 | 0.2457 | 0.1914 | 1.9429 | |
|
| 4275 | 0.0188 | 0.0212 | 0.0000 | 0.3854 | |
|
| 4275 | 0.1764 | 0.1002 | 0.0000 | 1.4852 |
Figure 1Test for parallel trends.
Baseline regression results.
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.176 *** | 0.176 *** | 0.179 *** | 0.179 *** | 0.181 *** | 0.168 *** |
| (3.58) | (3.58) | (3.62) | (3.59) | (3.65) | (3.40) | |
|
| 0.657 *** | 0.657 *** | 0.644 *** | 0.643 *** | 0.646 *** | 0.584 *** |
| (6.23) | (6.23) | (6.22) | (5.29) | (5.29) | (4.70) | |
|
| 0.0166 | 0.0191 | 0.0192 | 0.0218 | 0.0177 | |
| (0.19) | (0.22) | (0.22) | (0.25) | (0.21) | ||
|
| −0.682 *** | −0.682 *** | −0.669 *** | −0.669 *** | ||
| (−3.10) | (−3.10) | (−3.04) | (−3.07) | |||
|
| 0.00121 | −0.00562 | −0.0139 | |||
| (0.01) | (−0.04) | (−0.11) | ||||
|
| 0.540 | 0.669 | ||||
| (1.03) | (1.27) | |||||
|
| −0.620 ** | |||||
| (−2.51) | ||||||
|
| −11.84 *** | −11.93 *** | −11.64 *** | −11.63 *** | −11.70 *** | −10.65 *** |
| (−7.42) | (−7.08) | (−7.06) | (−6.30) | (−6.29) | (−5.63) | |
| Regional effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Time effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 |
|
| 0.830 | 0.830 | 0.832 | 0.832 | 0.832 | 0.833 |
Note: ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.
Estimation results of models using different multi-period DID methods.
| Variable | Reg | Areg | Reghdfe | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
|
| 0.185 *** | 0.168 *** | 0.185 *** | 0.168 *** | 0.185 *** | 0.168 *** |
| (6.33) | (5.82) | (6.33) | (5.82) | (6.33) | (5.82) | |
|
| 0.584 *** | 0.584 *** | 0.584 *** | |||
| (6.11) | (6.11) | (6.11) | ||||
|
| 0.0177 | 0.0177 | 0.0177 | |||
| (0.22) | (0.22) | (0.22) | ||||
|
| −0.669 *** | −0.669 *** | −0.669 *** | |||
| (−4.27) | (−4.27) | (−4.27) | ||||
|
| −0.0139 | −0.0139 | −0.0139 | |||
| (−0.15) | (−0.15) | (−0.15) | ||||
|
| 0.669 | 0.669 | 0.669 | |||
| (1.48) | (1.48) | (1.48) | ||||
|
| −0.620 *** | −0.620 *** | −0.620 *** | |||
| (−3.19) | (−3.19) | (−3.19) | ||||
|
| −0.766 *** | −11.08 *** | −1.906 *** | −10.65 *** | −1.698 *** | −10.92 *** |
| (−4.63) | (−6.31) | (−76.04) | (−7.25) | (−224.15) | (−7.10) | |
| Regional effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Time effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 |
|
| 0.870 | 0.876 | 0.870 | 0.876 | 0.870 | 0.876 |
Note: *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.
Estimation results of models after excluding samples of key cities or replacing a core explanatory variable.
| Variable | Excluding Samples of Key Cities | Replacing a Core Explanatory Variable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
|
| 0.171 *** | 0.156 *** | ||||
| (3.34) | (3.10) | |||||
|
| 1.343 *** | 0.177 * | 1.174 *** | 0.123 | ||
| (5.64) | (1.76) | (6.10) | (0.88) | |||
|
| 0.569 *** | 0.669 *** | 0.315 *** | |||
| (4.51) | (9.60) | (8.16) | ||||
|
| 0.0149 | 0.0398 | −0.0556 | |||
| (0.17) | (0.10) | (−1.17) | ||||
|
| −0.676 *** | −0.619 ** | −1.364 *** | |||
| (−3.09) | (−2.27) | (−4.00) | ||||
|
| 0.00457 | 0.0257 | 0.0260 | |||
| (0.04) | (0.18) | (0.23) | ||||
|
| 0.718 | 1.184 | −1.898 ** | |||
| (1.34) | (1.40) | (−2.44) | ||||
|
| −0.617 ** | −1.966 *** | 0.205 | |||
| (−2.51) | (−4.12) | (0.88) | ||||
|
| −1.906 *** | −10.41 *** | −1.899 *** | −12.22 *** | −1.871 *** | −6.331 *** |
| (−78.01) | (−5.44) | (−47.77) | (−6.06) | (−38.26) | (−10.88) | |
| Regional effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Time effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
| 4215 | 4215 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 |
|
| 0.824 | 0.833 | 0.033 | 0.089 | 0.033 | 0.172 |
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.
Estimation results of models with instrumental variables.
| Variable | First Stage | Second Stage | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.0079 *** | ||
| (−2.84) | |||
|
| 9.07 | 1.104 *** | |
| (1.16) | (2.89) | ||
|
| 0.0938 *** | −2.515 *** | −2.099 *** |
| (9.84) | (−3.64) | (3.78) | |
| Controlled variable | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 3705 | 3705 | 3705 |
Note: *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.
Estimation results of multi-period DID models by regions.
| Variable | East | Central | West | Northeast | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
|
| 0.231 *** | 0.260 *** | 0.342 *** | 0.283 *** | −0.0709 | −0.0863 | 0.316 * | 0.287 ** |
| (3.04) | (3.37) | (3.64) | (3.18) | (−0.73) | (−0.92) | (1.92) | (2.11) | |
|
| 0.924 *** | 0.849 *** | 0.543 ** | 0.227 | ||||
| (4.18) | (2.97) | (2.56) | (0.63) | |||||
|
| 0.0463 | 0.0429 | −0.174 | −0.846 | ||||
| (0.44) | (0.31) | (−0.55) | (−0.60) | |||||
|
| −4.47 *** | −1.74 *** | −0.206 | −0.912 | ||||
| (−4.80) | (−4.30) | (−1.14) | (−1.42) | |||||
|
| −0.153 | −0.0082 | −0.0199 | 0.422 | ||||
| (−0.65) | (−0.03) | (−0.09) | (1.52) | |||||
|
| −0.624 | −0.133 | 0.907 ** | 1.611 | ||||
| (−0.46) | (−0.10) | (2.15) | (0.87) | |||||
|
| −0.669 * | −1.883 * | −0.713 ** | −1.379 | ||||
| (−1.73) | (−1.72) | (−2.02) | (−1.54) | |||||
|
| −1.65 *** | −15.9 *** | −1.99 *** | −14.5 *** | −1.96 *** | −8.82 ** | −2.23 *** | −1.446 |
| (−32.9) | (−4.6) | (−55.6) | (−3.3) | (−42.0) | (−2.42) | (−33.2) | (−0.16) | |
| Regional effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Time effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 1305 | 1305 | 1200 | 1200 | 1260 | 1260 | 510 | 510 |
|
| 0.841 | 0.855 | 0.850 | 0.867 | 0.831 | 0.840 | 0.766 | 0.738 |
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.
Regression results of cities with different urban capacity and resource dependence.
| Variable | Urban Capacity | Resource Dependence | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developed City | Underdeveloped City | Resource-Based City | Non-Resource-Based City | |||||
|
| 0.257 *** | 0.254 *** | 0.0427 | 0.0256 | 0.0525 | 0.0578 | 0.232 *** | 0.202 *** |
| (3.29) | (3.46) | (0.60) | (0.37) | (0.59) | (0.62) | (3.80) | (3.44) | |
|
| 0.934 *** | 0.324 * | 0.350 * | 0.748 *** | ||||
| (4.51) | (1.84) | (1.83) | (4.39) | |||||
|
| 0.0821 | −0.259 ** | −0.0112 | −0.0547 | ||||
| (0.67) | (−2.07) | (−0.10) | (−0.49) | |||||
|
| −1.10 *** | −0.591 ** | −1.19 *** | −0.338 | ||||
| (−2.75) | (−2.51) | (−4.07) | (−1.25) | |||||
|
| −0.345 | 0.243 | −0.0038 | −0.0117 | ||||
| (−1.52) | (1.41) | (−0.02) | (−0.07) | |||||
|
| 1.813 * | 0.304 | −0.0481 | 1.689 * | ||||
| (1.75) | (0.63) | (−0.08) | (1.90) | |||||
|
| −0.356 * | −0.705 ** | −0.351 | −0.882 ** | ||||
| (−1.94) | (−2.16) | (−1.06) | (−2.22) | |||||
|
| −1.94 *** | −16.7 *** | −1.89 *** | −5.27 ** | −2.00 *** | −6.788 ** | −1.84 *** | −12.9 *** |
| (−46.3) | (−5.02) | (−64.9) | (−2.08) | (−50.7) | (−2.39) | (−60.8) | (−4.84) | |
| Regional effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Time effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 1515 | 1515 | 2760 | 2760 | 1680 | 1680 | 2595 | 2595 |
|
| 0.841 | 0.853 | 0.824 | 0.832 | 0.807 | 0.822 | 0.839 | 0.847 |
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.
Estimation results of influencing mechanism.
| Variable |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.0279 ** | 0.167 *** | 0.0189 ** | 0.171 *** | 0.447 *** | 0.141 *** |
| (2.21) | (3.36) | (2.3) | (3.49) | (3.80) | (2.85) | |
| Mediator | 0.0311 | 0.149 ** | 0.0619 *** | |||
| (0.32) | (2.42) | (2.67) | ||||
|
| 0.552 | −10.67 *** | −5.764 | −9.797 *** | −7.163 * | −10.21 *** |
| (1.39) | (−5.61) | (−1.44) | (−5.31) | (−1.87) | (−5.39) | |
| Controlled variable | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Regional effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Time effect | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
|
| 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 |
|
| 0.484 | 0.833 | 0.760 | 0.833 | 0.258 | 0.834 |
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.
Estimated results of spatial DID models with different weight matrices.
| Variable | Geographical Distance Spatial Weight Matrix | Economic Distance Spatial Weight Matrix | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDM | SLM | SEM | SDM | SLM | SEM | |
|
| 0.974 *** | 0.967 *** | 0.915 *** | 0.907 *** | ||
| (190.95) | (174.55) | (132.51) | (130.47) | |||
|
| 0.972 *** | 0.919 *** | ||||
| (191.78) | (135.96) | |||||
|
| 0.168 *** | 0.135 *** | 0.169 *** | 0.184 *** | 0.142 *** | 0.190 *** |
| (6.60) | (5.62) | (6.63) | (6.74) | (5.50) | (7.05) | |
|
| 0.137 | −0.242 *** | ||||
| (1.58) | (−4.21) | |||||
| Controlled variable | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
| Regional effect | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
| Time effect | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled | Controlled |
|
| 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 | 4275 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.151 | 0.067 | 0.035 | 0.042 | 0.072 |
Note: *** p < 0.01, Numbers in parentheses indicate z-scores.