| Literature DB >> 35162234 |
Lijuan Sun1,2,3,4, Shuangxi Li1,2,3, Peiyun Gong1,2,3, Ke Song1,2,3, Hong Zhang1,2,3, Yafei Sun1,2,3, Qin Qin1,2,3, Bin Zhou1,2,3, Yong Xue1,2,3.
Abstract
Exploring ways to reduce the risk of heavy metal pollution by organic fertilizer application is of vital importance. In the present study, by conducting a pot experiment, natural zeolite was applied together with pig manure based organic fertilizer to agricultural soil in order to test its possibility of reducing the risk of heavy metals originating from pig manure. The results showed that a low rate of organic fertilizer (10%) application increased the biomass of Chinese cabbage (by 57.2%), while a high rate of organic fertilizer (30%) decreased the biomass of Chinese cabbage (by 46.16%), and meanwhile a 3% zeolite addition increased the biomass of Chinese cabbage which was treated with 30% organic fertilizer. The organic fertilizer addition decreased soil pH and increased soil CEC, while zeolite addition increased soil pH and decreased the soil organic matter content. The concentration of Zn in Chinese cabbage shoots increased with the organic fertilizer addition from 4.46% to 48.27%, while the addition of 1% and 3% zeolite significantly decreased Zn in Chinese cabbage shoots by 15.53% and 14.08%, respectively. The concentration of DPTA-extractable and DGT-extractable Zn of soil was increased by organic fertilizer application, whereas zeolite addition decreased the concentration of DPTA-extractable and DGT-extractable Zn in soil treated with organic fertilizer. Our present study suggests that natural zeolite application could be a promising method to reduce the risk of heavy metals originating from organic fertilizers.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese cabbage; organic fertilizer; zeolite; zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35162234 PMCID: PMC8835060 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The biomass of Chinese cabbage in different treatments. (OF: organic fertilizer. Values were mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by different letters within a column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) at LSD test).
Figure 2The pH (a), CEC (b) and organic matter content (c) value of soil in different treatments. (OF: organic fertilizer. Values were mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by different letters within a column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) at LSD test).
Figure 3The concentration of Zn in plant shoot in different treatments. (OF: organic fertilizer. Values were mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by different letters within a column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) at LSD test).
Figure 4The concentration of DTPA-extractable Zn (a) and DGT-extractable Zn (b) in soil of different treatments. (OF: organic fertilizer. Values were mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by different letters within a column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) at LSD test).
Figure 5Concentration and percentage of Zn present in each fraction of soil subjected to different treatments. (OF: organic fertilizer. Fraction 1: exchangeable, fraction 2: bound to carbonates, fraction 3: bound to iron and manganese oxides, fraction 4: bound to organic matter, fraction 5: residual).