| Literature DB >> 35162185 |
Celia Marcen1, Eduardo Piedrafita1, Rubén Oliván1, Irela Arbones2.
Abstract
Sport participation and physical activity promotion have been intensively studied, especially regarding large cities. However, in many cases, rural municipalities have comparatively reduced services, including health care, due to the low profitability that these have for companies and entities. In this sense, the purpose of this article was to describe a case study of the promotion of physical activity in rural areas based on the results of a European project. Carried out in a rural municipality of around 8500 inhabitants with a population density of less than 25 inhabitants/km2, the project's purpose was the promotion of autonomous physical activity among its inhabitants. For this, a diagnostic analysis of the sports areas of the environment and a survey of physical activity habits among the population were carried out. A series of routes were designed, marked, and signposted, and canopies with explanatory posters about the possibilities of healthy physical activity and recommendations were added. Free-use facilities were installed, and opening events were carried out in such a way as to stimulate sports practice among the population. This article presents the results obtained from the analysis, as well as the possibilities of replication in other municipalities with similar needs.Entities:
Keywords: environment; healthy lifestyles; informal sport; outdoor sports; semi-rural
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35162185 PMCID: PMC8834896 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Zuera municipality location (from Google Maps©; data from ©2021 Inst. Geografía Nacional; accessed on 27 November 2021).
Review questionnaire for the experts’ validation.
| Item | Answer | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
| 1. The questions seem relevant to the subject under study. | |||
| 2. The order of the questions seems appropriate to me. | |||
| 3. Questions are easily understood. | |||
| 4. Answers are mutually exclusive when only one option can be chosen (each answer rules out the others). | |||
| 5. I have no doubts about how to answer the questions. | |||
| 6. The duration of the questionnaire seems adequate to me. | |||
| 7. The format of the questionnaire seems adequate and pleasant to use. | |||
Figure 2SWOT analysis of physical activity resources in the Zuera municipality.
Figure 3Sport meaning’ identification (answering ‘Sport for you is…’) in percentages.
Figure 4Heatmap of different responses to questions about sport participation (only for those who answered that they play sports).
Figure 5Sport values (answering ‘what can sport do for the youth?’).
Figure 6Matrix with the results of the Goodman and Kruskal tau statistic. The highest association values are marked with a darker red color (values of tau are expressed as percentages in the figure).
Figure 7Dendrogram with the clustering results of the different individuals based on their responses.
Descriptive statistics about the participants.
| Participants | Variable | Number |
|---|---|---|
| Total number of evaluation questionnaires received | 131 | |
| Total number of evaluation questionnaires validated | 129 | |
| Validated/received questionnaires percentage | 98.5 | |
| Participants percentage in validated questionnaires based on gender | Men | 52.7 |
| Women | 47.3 | |
| Participants percentage in validated questionnaires based on age groups | <14 years old | 53.5 |
| 14–24 years old | 20.2 | |
| 25–44 years old | 14.7 | |
| 45–64 years old | 11.6 | |
| Participants percentage in validated questionnaires based on residence periods in Zuera | <2 years | 2.3 |
| 2–5 years | 7.8 | |
| 5–10 years | 7.8 | |
| >10 years | 46.5 | |
| No residence in Zuera | 35.7 |
Descriptive statistics of the sample.
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| x1_Time of residence | |
| 2 or less years | 13 (3.31%) |
| 2–5 years | 16 (4.07%) |
| 5–10 years | 19 (4.83%) |
| More than 10 years | 88 (22.39%) |
| All my life | 257 (65.39%) |
| x2_Gender | |
| Men | 180 (45.8%) |
| Women | 212 (53.94%) |
| Other | 1 (0.25%) |
| x3_Age | |
| 14–24 | 95 (24.17%) |
| 25–44 | 184 (46.82%) |
| 45–64 | 114 (29.01%) |
| Employment situation | |
| Unemployed | 32 (8.14%) |
| Other | 70 (17.81%) |
| Retired | 3 (0.76%) |
| Employed | 280 (71.25%) |
| Unpaid housework | 8 (2.04%) |
| Family situation | |
| Other | 8 (2.04%) |
| I live with colleagues or friends | 3 (0.76%) |
| I live with my children or dependents | 20 (5.09%) |
| I live with my parents | 122 (31.04%) |
| I live in couple with children | 144 (36.64%) |
| I live in couple without children | 68 (17.3%) |
| I live by my own | 28 (7.12%) |