| Literature DB >> 35161736 |
Yuanyuan Chen1,2, Li Sun1,2, Zhiyuan Pei1,2, Juanying Sun1,2, He Li3, Weijie Jiao1,2, Jiong You1,2.
Abstract
Crop lodging is a major destructive factor for agricultural production. Developing a cost-efficient and accurate method to assess crop lodging is crucial for informing crop management decisions and reducing lodging losses. Satellite remote sensing can provide continuous data on a large scale; however, its utility in detecting lodging crops is limited due to the complexity of lodging events and the unavailability of high spatial and temporal resolution data. Gaofen1 satellite was launched in 2013. The short revisit cycle and wide orbit coverage of the Gaofen1 satellite make it suitable for lodging identification. However, few studies have explored lodging detection using Gaofen1 data, and the operational application of existing approaches over large spatial extents seems to be unrealistic. In this paper, we discuss the identification method of lodged maize and explore the potential of using Gaofen1 data. An analysis of the spectral features after maize lodging revealed that reflectance increased significantly in all bands, compared to non-lodged maize. A spectral sum index was proposed to distinguish lodged and non-lodged maize. Two study areas were considered: Zhaodong City in Heilongjiang Province and Ningjiang District in Jilin Province. The results of the identified lodged maize from the Gaofen1 data were validated based on three methods: first, ground sample points exhibited the overall accuracies of 92.86% and 88.24% for Zhaodong City and Ningjiang District, respectively; second, the cross-comparison differences of 1.01% for Zhaodong City and 1.13% for Ningjiang District were obtained, compared to the results acquired from the finer-resolution Planet data; and third, the identified results from Gaofen1 data and those from farmer survey questionnaires were found to be consistent. The validation results indicate that the proposed index is promising, and the Gaofen1 data have the potential for rapid lodging monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: Gaofen1; index; maize lodging; spectral feature
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35161736 PMCID: PMC8838794 DOI: 10.3390/s22030989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Study areas with false-color images (R: band 4; G: band 3; B: band 2).
The parameters of the satellite data used in this paper.
| Satellite Type | Band Number | Band | Wavelength | Spatial Resolution (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GF-1 WFV | 1 | Blue | 0.45–0.52 | 16 |
| 2 | Green | 0.52–0.59 | ||
| 3 | Red | 0.63–0.69 | ||
| 4 | Near-infrared | 0.77–0.89 | ||
| Planet | 1 | Blue | 0.46–0.52 | 3 |
| 2 | Green | 0.50–0.59 | ||
| 3 | Red | 0.59–0.67 | ||
| 4 | Near-infrared | 0.78–0.86 |
Figure 2The scope of the Planet data coverage in a false-color image (R: band 4; G: band 3; and B: band 2) in (a) Zhaodong City and (b) Ningjiang District.
Figure 3Distribution of sample points overlaid on Gaofen1 images in (a) Zhaodong City and (b) Ningjiang District.
Figure 4The workflow of lodged maize identification.
Figure 5The value of spectral sum calculated according to the training samples for lodged and non-lodged maize in (a) Zhaodong City and (b) Ningjiang District. The value pointed by the blue dotted line represents the appropriate threshold to discriminate lodged and non-lodged maize.
Figure 6Box plots of spectral reflectance for lodged (shown with a slashed background) and non-lodged maize (shown without a slashed background) in (a) Zhaodong City and (b) Ningjiang District. The black color is for the blue, green, and red bands; the red color is for the near-infrared band.
The spectral reflectance variation in lodged maize compared to the non-lodged maize.
| Band | Zhaodong City | Ningjiang District | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increment | Amplification (%) | Increment | Amplification (%) | |
| Blue | 0.0212 | 112.77 | 0.0105 | 43.57 |
| Green | 0.0333 | 67.14 | 0.0190 | 31.00 |
| Red | 0.0312 | 95.41 | 0.0161 | 35.62 |
| Near-infrared | 0.0686 | 14.59 | 0.1089 | 25.06 |
Figure 7Distribution maps of the lodged and non-lodged maize in (a) Zhaodong City and (b) Ningjiang District.
Error matrix between the identified results of the lodged and non-lodged maize and the properties of validating samples.
| Identified Results | Zhaodong City | Ningjiang District | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Properties of | Lodged Maize | Non-Lodged Maize | Producer’s | Lodged Maize | Non-Lodged Maize | Producer’s | |
| Lodged maize | 20 | 1 | 95.24 | 18 | 2 | 90 | |
| Non-lodged maize | 2 | 19 | 90.48 | 2 | 12 | 85.71 | |
| User’s accuracy (UA, %) | 90.91 | 95 | 90 | 85.71 | |||
| Overall accuracy | 92.86% | 88.24% | |||||
Statistics of the lodged maize questionnaire answered by farmers.
| Lodging Proportion (%) | Number of Questionnaires in Zhaodong City | Number of Questionnaires in Ningjiang District |
|---|---|---|
| 81–100 | 5 | 9 |
| 61–80 | 4 | 2 |
| 41–60 | 7 | 5 |
| 21–40 | 0 | 1 |
| 0–20 | 2 | 0 |
| Sum | 18 | 17 |
Figure 8The values of the normalized difference vegetation index for the lodged and non-lodged maize in (a) Zhaodong City and (b) Ningjiang District.
The change in the normalized difference vegetation index and spectral sum index between the lodged and non-lodged maize.
| Index | Zhaodong City | Ningjiang District | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Lodged | Lodged | Increment | Amplification | Non-Lodged | Lodged | Increment | Amplification | |
| Spectral sum | 0.5714 | 0.7256 | 0.1542 | 26.99% | 0.5652 | 0.7197 | 0.1545 | 27.34% |
| NDVI | 0.8699 | 0.7886 | −0.0813 | −9.35% | 0.7528 | 0.7426 | −0.0102 | −1.35% |