| Literature DB >> 35161090 |
Manal M Khowdiary1,2, Nahla A Taha3, Nashwa M Saleh4, Ahmed A Elhenawy5,6.
Abstract
The synthesis of novel corrosion inhibitors and biocide metal complex nanoparticle surfactants was achieved through the reaction of sulfonamide with selenious acid to produce a quaternary ammonium salt. Platinum and cobalt surfactants were then formed by complexing the first products with platinum (II) or cobalt (II) ions. The surface properties of these surfactants were then investigated, and the free energy of form micelles (ΔGomic) and adsorption (ΔGoads) was determined. The obtained cationic compounds were evaluated as corrosion inhibitors for carbon steel dissolution in 1N HCl medium. The results of gravimetric and electrochemical measurements showed that the obtained inhibitors were excellent corrosion inhibitors. The anti-sulfate-reducing bacteria activity known to cause corrosion of oil pipes was obtained by the inhibition zone diameter method for the prepared compounds, which were measured against sulfate-reducing bacteria. FTIR spectra, elemental analysis, H1 NMR spectrum, and 13C labeling were performed to ensure the purity of the prepared compounds.Entities:
Keywords: antitumor activity; cationic surfactant; corrosion; critical micelle concentration
Year: 2022 PMID: 35161090 PMCID: PMC8838271 DOI: 10.3390/ma15031146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1CA inhibition mechanism by sulfonamides.
Figure 2Metalo (II) 4-amino-benzenesulfonamide hydrogen complex.
The critical micelle concentration (CMC) and surface parameters of synthesized surfactants.
| Comp. No. | CMC X 10−3 | Γcmc (mN/m) | Πcmc (mN/m) | PC20 (Mole/L) | Γmax X 10−11 (Mole/cm2) | Amin (nm2) | Δ Gads | Δ Gmic | ΔGads/Amin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIa | 1.2 | 32 | 40 | 3.9 | 10.4 | 1.5 | −67.7 | −34.1 | −46.8 |
| IIb | 1.1 | 30 | 42 | 4.1 | 10.2 | 1.5 | −69.9 | −34.8 | −49.1 |
| IIc | 0.80 | 29 | 43 | 4.3 | 11.1 | 1.45 | −71.1 | −35.3 | −50.2 |
Figure 3Variation in surface tension of surfactants IIa-c vs. concentration at 25 °C concentration expressed as mol/L.
Inhibition zone diameter (mm/mg sample) for the synthesized cationic surfactants against sulfate-reducing bacteria.
| Sample | Inhibition Zone Diameter (Iz D) |
|---|---|
| IIa | 22 |
| IIb | 20 |
| IIc | 18 |
Effect of cationic surfactant inhibitor concentration (IIb) at 30 °C temperature degrees.
| Temperature | Conc. of Inhibitor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 0.00 | 1.307 |
|
| 1 × 10−4 | 0.838 | 35.86 | |
| 5 × 10−4 | 0.643 | 50.80 | |
| 1 × 10−3 | 0.402 | 69.26 | |
| 5 × 10−3 | 0.298 | 77.16 | |
| 1 × 10−2 | 0.241 | 81.54 |
Effect of cationic surfactant inhibitor concentration (IIc) at 30 °C temperature degrees.
| Temperature | Conc. of Inhibitor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 0.00 | 1.4 |
|
| 1 × 10−4 | 0.5 | 61.82 | |
| 5 × 10−4 | 0.261 | 80.01 | |
| 1 × 10−3 | 0.222 | 83.01 | |
| 5 × 10−3 | 0.103 | 92.11 | |
| 1 × 10−2 | 0.070 | 94.68 |
Figure 4Polarization curves of carbon steel corrosion in 1 N HCl solution containing different concentrations of IIb inhibitor at 25 °C.
Electrochemical polarization parameters of carbon steel corrosion in the presence different concentrations of IIb and IIc inhibitors.
| Inhibitor Name | Conc. of Inhibitor (M) | Ecorr (mV) | Icorr (mAcm−2) | βa (mV/Decade) | βc (mV/Decade) | θ | ηP% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without inhibitor | 0.00 | −487.3 | 2.02 | 208.1 | 202.4 | - | - |
| IIb | 1 × 10−4 | −499.0 | 0.0646 | 118.0 | −137.4 | 0.72 | 71.55 |
| 5 × 10−4 | −485.5 | 0.0345 | 114.8 | −161.6 | 0.85 | 84.81 | |
| 1 × 10−3 | −485.4 | 0.0299 | 137.2 | −194.2 | 0.87 | 86.83 | |
| 5 × 10−3 | −477.2 | 0.0280 | 117.6 | −104.2 | 0.88 | 87.67 | |
| 1 × 10−2 | −504.7 | 0.0243 | 128.1 | −140.3 | 0.89 | 89.30 | |
| IIc | 1 × 10−4 | −563.6 | 0.0530 | 116.5 | −176.3 | 0.77 | 76.66 |
| 5 × 10−4 | −475.7 | 0.0315 | 128.2 | −112.7 | 0.86 | 86.13 | |
| 1 × 10−3 | −478.8 | 0.0277 | 127.6 | −106.3 | 0.88 | 87.80 | |
| 5 × 10−3 | −509.6 | 0.0244 | 108.8 | −170.1 | 0.89 | 89.26 | |
| 1 × 10−2 | −496.9 | 0.0233 | 125.8 | −196.5 | 0.90 | 89.74 |
Figure 5Image of the surface appearance of immersed samples in 1 M HCl by Scanning Electron Microscope (a) without inhibitor; and (b–d) in the presence of 1 × 10−1 10, 1 × 10−2, 1 × 10−3 M IIb inhibitor, respectively.
Figure 6Docking energy scores (kcal/mol) for investigated compounds. ΔG: Free binding energy of the ligand from a given conformer; Int.: Affinity binding energy of hydrogen bond interaction with receptor; H.B.: Hydrogen bonding energy between protein and ligand; Eele: Electrostatic interaction with the receptor; Evdw: Van der Waals energies.
Figure 7The Docked most active complexes into the electrostatic surface active sites of IDs: 4ZZt, 3T88, 5HWC and 5LJI using MOE tool [32].