| Literature DB >> 35160770 |
Volodymyr Nahornyi1, Anton Panda2, Jan Valíček3,4, Marta Harničárová3,4, Milena Kušnerová3, Iveta Pandová2, Stanislaw Legutko5, Zuzana Palková3,4, Ondrej Lukáč4.
Abstract
The article aims to use the generated sound as operational information needed for adaptive control of the metalworking process and early monitoring and diagnosis of the condition of the machined materials using a newly introduced surface roughness quality index due to the sound-controlled machining process. The object of the measurement was correlation between the sound intensity generated during cutting and the material parameters of the machined surface, i.e., the roughness of the machined surface and the degree of wear of the cutting tool. The roughness was measured during longitudinal turning of a steel billet with a P25 insert made of 12X18H10T steel and a T15K6 cutting insert made of a titanium, cobalt, and tungsten group alloy. The correlation between the sound and roughness of the machined surface was 0.93, whereas between the sound and wear of the cutting tool was 0.93. The correlation between sound and tool wear in the experiment with P25 and T15K6 cutting inserts and the correlation between sound and roughness is positive.Entities:
Keywords: CNC lathe; adaptive control of the cutting process; generated sound; steel; surface roughness; tool wear
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160770 PMCID: PMC8836884 DOI: 10.3390/ma15030823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Process diagram, where f—adjustable feed rate, n—adjustable cutting speed, f0—initial feed rate and n0—initial cutting speed, —relative sound signal.
Figure 2The surface of part of the workpiece after the cutting process and magnified by a microscope.
Figure 3Automated monitoring of the technical conditions of the lathe.
Experimental conditions implemented during turning.
| Cutting Inserts | Cutting Conditions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P 25 | 125 | 0.15 | 1 | 98.0 |
| T15K6 | 315 | 0.20 | 1 | |
Figure 4Sound control with a tablet.
Figure 5Installing the microphone in the immediate vicinity of the cut area.
Figure 6Trend of parameters and curve corresponding to the degree of wear VB.
Figure 7Correlation dependence between parameter and size of flank wear VB.
Figure 8A quality indicator for adaptive control a.
Figure 9Sound trend and wear curve.
Figure 10Quality indicator for adaptive control a.
Figure 11Roughness and sound (parameters) dependence.
Figure 12Course of roughness and sound signal depending on basic length L and cutting time τ.