| Literature DB >> 35160725 |
Chaoyu Chen1, Mingxu Sun1, Zhi Cheng1, Yao Liang1.
Abstract
In order to present the multiple reflow process during electronic packaging, the influence of the different short-time reheating temperatures on the microstructure and shear strength of the Cu/Au80Sn20/Cu solder joints was studied and discussed. The results showed that high-quality Cu/Au80Sn20/Cu solder joints were obtained with 30 °C for 3 min. The joints were mainly composed of the ζ-(Au,Cu)5Sn intermetallic compound (IMC) with an average thickness of 8 μm between Cu and solder matrix, and (ζ-(Au,Cu)5Sn +δ-(Au,Cu)Sn) eutectic structure in the solder matrix. With an increase in the multiple reflow temperature from 180 °C to 250 °C, the microstructure of the joint interface showed little change due to the barrier effect of the formed ζ IMC layer and the limitation of short-time reheating on the element diffusion. The eutectic structures in the solder matrix were coarsened and transformed from lamellar to the bulk morphology. The shear strength of the as-welded joint reached 31.5 MPa. The joint shear strength decreased slightly with reheating temperatures lower than 200 °C, while it decreased significantly (by about 10%) with reheating temperatures above 250 °C compared to the as-welded joint. The shear strength of the joints was determined by the brittle solder matrix, showing that the joint strength decreased with the coarsening of the δ phase in the eutectic structure.Entities:
Keywords: fracture; interfaces; intermetallics; joining; microstructure
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160725 PMCID: PMC8836702 DOI: 10.3390/ma15030780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Shape and size of specimens. (a) Schematic diagram of welding assembly; (b) shape and size of specimens.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of shear strength testing device.
Figure 3(a) Weld appearance of the as-welded joint; (b) microstructure of the as-welded joint; (c) microstructure of the 180 °C reheated joint; (d) microstructure of the 210 °C reheated joint; (e) microstructure of the 250 °C reheated joint.
Chemical composition of points 1–6 in Figure 3 and possible phases (at%).
| Au | Sn | Cu | Possible Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53.47 | 12.90 | 33.63 | ζ |
| 2 | 52.96 | 12.83 | 34.21 | ζ |
| 3 | 52.97 | 12.69 | 34.33 | ζ |
| 4 | 53.48 | 12.97 | 33.55 | ζ |
| 5 | 54.91 | 14.26 | 30.38 | ζ |
| 6 | 49.91 | 48.40 | 1.70 | δ |
Figure 4Au-Sn binary phase diagram.
Figure 5EDS line scanning of the as-welded joint.
Figure 6EDS element mapping results of the 250 °C reheated joint: (a) Cu element; (b) Sn element; (c) Au element.
Figure 7Shear strengths and the Sn content on the fracture surface of the as-welded joint and the joints with different reheating temperatures.
Shear strengths of the as-welded joint and the joints with different reheating temperatures.
| Reheating Temperature (°C) | As-Welded | 180 | 210 | 250 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shear strength (MPa) | 31.5 | 31.1 | 30.2 | 27.3 |
| Sn content (at%) | 30.43 | 32.51 | 35.83 | 40.71 |
Figure 8Fracture surface of the joints. (a) As-welded joint; (b) 180 °C reheated joint; (c) 210 °C reheated joint; (d) 250 °C reheated joint.
Chemical compositions of the phases denoted by arrows in Figure 8 (at%).
| Au | Sn | Cu | Possible Phases | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.78 | 0.22 | 99.01 | Cu(s,s) |
| B | 55.32 | 30.43 | 14.26 | (ζ + δ) |
| C | 55.39 | 32.51 | 12.10 | (ζ + δ) |
| D | 50.33 | 43.61 | 6.06 | δ |
| E | 48.62 | 44.21 | 7.17 | δ |
| F | 52.30 | 35.83 | 11.88 | (ζ + δ) |
| G | 52.27 | 40.71 | 7.02 | δ |