| Literature DB >> 35160702 |
Zhilong Liu1,2, Jie Liu2, Yanping Huang2, Tongxi Li2, Changhua Nie2, Yanjun Xia1, Li Zhan2, Zhangchun Tang1,3, Lin Zhang2.
Abstract
The number of fault samples for the new nuclear valve is commonly rare; thus, the machine learning algorithm is not suitable for the fault prediction of this kind of equipment. In order to overcome this difficulty, this paper proposes a novel method for the fault critical point prediction of the gate valve based on the characteristic analysis of the operation process variables. The operation process of gate valve switch often contains various fault characteristics and information, and this method first adopts the Shannon entropy to describe the power spectrum of vibration signal relevant to the operation process of gate valve switch, and then employs the mean value of the power spectrum entropy as an indirect process variable and further investigates the differences between the indirect process variable under the healthy state and the fault state with a different fault degree. In addition, the power signal of the gate valve is also employed as the direct process variable and the features of the direct process variable under the healthy state and the fault state with different fault degrees are also investigated. Based on the previous indirect process variable and direct process variable, the prediction approach for the critical point of the gate valve fault is established by analyzing the change in the indirect process variable and direct process variable before and after faults. Finally, the data of a nuclear gate valve experiment are employed to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed method and the results show that the proposed method can effectively predict the fault critical point of the mentioned nuclear gate valve. If the diagnostic threshold is set properly, the critical point prediction of a nuclear gate valve fault can be realized as 100% or close to 100%. Furthermore, the proposed method can be directly applied to the nuclear gate valve in a nuclear power plant to improve the operation reliability of the valve. At the same time, the method can be applied to the fault diagnosis and prediction of valves in other fields, such as the chemical industry.Entities:
Keywords: Shannon entropy; fault critical point; fault prediction; nuclear gate valve; power spectral entropy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160702 PMCID: PMC8836964 DOI: 10.3390/ma15030757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Vibration signal diagram when the gate valve is normally closed.
Figure 2Vibration signal diagram of the three valve closing processes before gate valve failure. (a) The first closing process of gate valve before failure. (b) The second closing process of gate valve before failure. (c) The third closing process of gate valve before failure.
Figure 3Power waveform when the gate valve is normally closed.
Figure 4The power waveforms of three valve closing processes before gate valve failure. (a) The first closing process of gate valve before failure. (b) The second closing process of gate valve before failure. (c) The third closing process of gate valve before failure.
Figure 5Overall block diagram of gate valve fault critical point prediction method based on analysis of characteristics of operating process variables.
Figure 6Experimental platform for nuclear gate valve.
Figure 7Connection of three operation sections and location of fault critical point of nuclear gate valve.
Figure 8Variation trend of gate valve power in eleven valve closing processes before fault.
Figure 9The change trend of (d(n) − d(0))/d(0) in eleven valve closing processes before fault.
Figure 10The change diagram of fault diagnosis variable L.
Figure 11The change diagram of fault diagnosis variable R.
Figure 12The change diagram of predictive variable F at critical point of failure.
Comparison of typical equipment fault prediction methods and method in this paper.
| Existing Typical Fault Prediction Method | Method Accuracy | Method Advantages | Method Disadvantages | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method based on canonical variate analysis (CVA) | ≤91.4% | A large number of samples and fault characteristic data are not required for model training | Fault diagnosis is realized, fault prediction is not realized | Based on the analysis of typical variables, details are given in literature [ |
| Method based on clustering and data | 80–94% | High diagnostic accuracy | A large number of data and samples are required and failure can-not be predicted | It belongs to the method of machine learning, details are given in literature [ |
| Sensitive variable feature fusion analysis method proposed in this paper | If the threshold is selected appropriately, accuracy is 100% | Small amount of calculation, high accuracy, no need for a lot of data and samples | Need to choose thresholds | According to the given principles, appropriate thresholds can be selected. If thresholds is not accurate, fault can still be predicted to a certain extent |