| Literature DB >> 35160625 |
Abdullah M Asiri1, Valerio Pugliese2, Francesco Petrosino2, Sher Bahadar Khan1, Khalid Ahmad Alamry1, Soliman Y Alfifi1, Hadi M Marwani1, Maha M Alotaibi1, Debolina Mukherjee2, Sudip Chakraborty2.
Abstract
This work aimed to investigate the degradation performance of natural cellulose acetate (CA) membranes filled with ZnO nanostructures. Photocatalytic degradation of reactive toxic dye methylene blue (MB) was studied as a model reaction using UV light. A CA membrane was previously casted and fabricated through the phase inversion processes and laboratory-synthesized ZnO microparticles as filler. The prepared membrane was characterized for pore size, ultrafiltration (UF) performance, porosity, morphology using scanning electron micrographs (SEM), water contact angle and catalytic degradation of MB. The prepared membrane shows a significant amount of photocatalytic oxidation under UV. The photocatalytic results under UV-light radiation in CA filled with ZnO nanoparticles (CA/ZnO) demonstrated faster and more efficient MB degradation, resulting in more than 30% of initial concentration. The results also revealed how the CA/ZnO combination effectively improves the membrane's photocatalytic activity toward methylene blue (MB), showing that the degradation process of dye solutions to UV light is chemically and physically stable and cost-effective. This photocatalytic activity toward MB of the cellulose acetate membranes has the potential to make these membranes serious competitors for removing textile dye and other pollutants from aqueous solutions. Hence, polymer-ZnO composite membranes were considered a valuable and attractive topic in membrane technology.Entities:
Keywords: PES; blended membrane; cellulose acetate; photocatalyst; textile dye; water treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160625 PMCID: PMC8839026 DOI: 10.3390/polym14030636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Membrane composition.
| Sample | Cellulose | ZnO | DMF | Cellulose | DMF | ZnO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA12 | 12 | 0 | 88 | 2.4 | 17.6 | 0 |
| CA12-Z1 | 12 | 1 | 87 | 2.4 | 17.4 | 0.2 |
| CA15 | 15 | 0 | 85 | 3 | 17 | 0 |
| CA15-Z1 | 15 | 1 | 84 | 3 | 16.8 | 0.2 |
Figure 1Photocatalytic membrane (CA-ZnO) reactor.
Figure 2UV-Vis absorption spectrum.
Figure 3Surface SEM images of an uncoated membrane (A–C), 1% ZnO blended membrane (B–D), cross-section of the asymmetric CA membrane 12% CA + ZnO (E), top view of the asymmetric CA membrane 12% CA + ZnO, (F) inside view of the asymmetric CA membrane 12% CA + ZnO an individual ZnO flower (G).
Figure 4Mechanical strength of CA and CA + ZnO nanoparticles (diff wt%).
Water contact angle of the prepared membranes.
| Membrane Code | Permeability (LMH/bar) | Contact Angle |
|---|---|---|
| CA12 | 220 | 82.2 ± 0.7 |
| CA12-Z1 | 445 | 77.1 ± 2.3 |
| CA15 | 0 | 82.7 ± 2.1 |
| CA15-Z1 | 0 | 76.0 ± 2.3 |
Figure 5XRD analysis of (a) CA- ZnO membrane and (b) ZnO nanoparticles.
Figure 6TGA results increase decomposition temperature for (0.0 and 1.0 wt%) of ZnO on CA membranes.
Figure 7MB’s degradation under UV light (a) and visible light (b) for a virgin and blended membrane.