| Literature DB >> 35160552 |
Dongzhi Zhu1, Eiji Kurahashi2, Hui You1, Toru Wada1, Patchanee Chammingkwan1, Toshiaki Taniike1.
Abstract
In situ grafting of a reactive matrix and nanofillers is a promising strategy to fabricate graft-type polypropylene (PP)-based nanocomposites, where the grafting efficiency is affected by the initial dispersion of nanofillers in the matrix. In this work, influences of surface organic modification of nanofillers were investigated on properties of PP/SiO2 nanocomposites using poly(propylene-co-octenyltrimethoxysilane) as a reactive matrix. The surface modification of SiO2, especially with longer alkyl chains, led to improved dispersion of nanoparticles, thus promoting the grafting reaction and mechanical properties. The combination of in situ grafting and surface modification of nanofillers provided several benefits, most notably in balancing the strength and the toughness, which could not be achieved by the grafting alone.Entities:
Keywords: PP nanocomposites; in situ grafting; reactive matrix; surface modification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160552 PMCID: PMC8838797 DOI: 10.3390/polym14030563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Characterization of unmodified and organically modified SiO2 nanoparticles: (a) FTIR spectra, (b) TG curves, and (c) water contact angles.
Silane grafting amounts derived from TGA.
| Sample | Silane Grafting Density (nm−2) b | |
|---|---|---|
| C6-0.1-SiO2 | 1.57 | 1.43 |
| C12-0.1-SiO2 | 0.89 | 0.81 |
| C16-0.1-SiO2 | 0.72 | 0.66 |
| C16-0.01-SiO2 | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| C16-1-SiO2 | 1.03 | 0.94 |
a Calculated based on Equation (3); b The surface area of SiO2 was measured as 110 m2 g−1.
Figure 2TEM images of nanocomposites: (a) HomoPP/SiO2, (b) PP-OTMS/SiO2, (c) PP-OTMS/C6-0.1-SiO2, (d) PP-OTMS/C12-0.1-SiO2, and (e) PP-OTMS/C16-0.1-SiO2. The SiO2 content was 5.0 wt% for all the samples. (f) The dispersion parameter (D) acquired from TEM images.
Figure 3The OMe content analyzed by 1H NMR before and after melt mixing.
Melting and crystallization behaviors of nanocomposites analyzed by DSC.
| Sample | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HomoPP | 161 | 49 | 117 | 0.13 |
| HomoPP/SiO2 | 161 | 48 | 118 | 0.21 |
| PP-OTMS | 163 | 53 | 126 | 2.11 |
| PP-OTMS/SiO2 | 164 | 52 | 129 | 4.63 |
| PP-OTMS/C6-0.1-SiO2 | 164 | 50 | 129 | 4.59 |
| PP-OTMS/C12-0.1-SiO2 | 164 | 49 | 129 | 4.90 |
| PP-OTMS/C16-0.1-SiO2 | 164 | 49 | 129 | 5.21 |
a Inverse of the half time of isothermal crystallization at 144 °C.
Tensile properties of nanocomposites.
| Sample | Young’s Modulus | Yield Strength | Elongation at Break | Toughness (MJ/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HomoPP | 576 ± 18 | 30.2 ± 0.3 | 24.3 ± 2.7 | 5.4 ± 0.8 |
| HomoPP/SiO2 | 617 ± 46 | 29.6 ± 0.4 | 13.9 ± 1.1 | 2.8± 0.2 |
| PP-OTMS | 621 ± 30 | 34.8 ± 0.5 | 32.0 ± 6.5 | 7.9 ± 0.9 |
| PP-OTMS/SiO2 | 639 ± 39 | 36.5 ± 1.5 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.2 |
| PP-OTMS/C6-0.1-SiO2 | 646 ± 40 | 36.8 ± 0.6 | 14.4 ± 1.6 | 3.1 ± 0.6 |
| PP-OTMS/C12-0.1-SiO2 | 657 ± 28 | 37.6 ± 1.1 | 18.1 ± 4.1 | 4.3 ± 1.2 |
| PP-OTMS/C16-0.1-SiO2 | 662 ± 52 | 37.8 ± 1.0 | 20.1 ± 2.2 | 5.8 ± 0.7 |
| PP-OTMS/C16-0.01-SiO2 | 633 ± 56 | 36.7 ± 0.8 | 13.8 ± 0.7 | 3.5 ± 0.2 |
| PP-OTMS/C16-1-SiO2 | 620 ± 46 | 35.8 ± 2.8 | 12.9 ± 3.9 | 3.1 ± 1.2 |