| Literature DB >> 35160168 |
Rossella Cannarella1, Rosita A Condorelli1, Sarah Perelli1, Aldo E Calogero1, Emanuela Greco2, Antonio Aversa3, Sandro La Vignera1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether varicocele affects testicular 25-hydroxylase activity.Entities:
Keywords: 25-hydroxylase; parathyroid hormone; testicular function; varicocele; vitamin D
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160168 PMCID: PMC8836852 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Trend over time of anthropometric, hormonal values, testicular volume, sperm parameters, and sperm DNA fragmentation in patients with III degrees bilateral varicocele.
| Parameters | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 22.6 ± 1.4 | 22.9 ± 1.0 | 23.0 ± 0.8 | 22.8 ± 0.6 |
| FSH (IU/L) | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.5 * | 3.2 ± 0.5 * |
| LH (IU/L) | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 4.1 ± 0.7 * | 5.5 ± 1.4 *,† | 6.6 ± 1.5 *,†,‡ |
| TT (ng/mL) | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.6 * | 4.7 ± 0.6 * | 4.5 ± 0.6 * |
| Total TV (mL) | 16.8 ± 1.3 | 15.8 ± 1.6 | 15.1 ± 1.7 * | 14.2 ± 1.7 *,† |
| Sperm concentration (million/mL) | 78.3 ± 10.4 | 71.8 ± 8.9 | 78.5 ± 7.8 | 71.1 ± 9.5 |
| Sperm progressive motility (%) | 51.1 ± 7.1 | 46.6 ± 5.9 | 47.4 ± 6.1 | 51.2 ± 5.2 |
| Spermatozoa with normal morphology (%) | 13.0 ± 2.2 | 12.0 ± 1.5 | 11.4 ± 2.8 | 12.6 ± 1.7 |
| SDF rate (%) | 2.1 ± 2.5 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.9 |
Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; LH = luteinizing hormone; SD = standard deviation; SDF = sperm DNA fragmentation; T0 = baseline; T1 = 1-year follow-up; T2 = 2-year follow-up; T3 = 3-year follow-up; TT = total testosterone; TV = testicular volume. * p < 0.05 vs. T0; † p < 0.05 vs. T1; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. T2. Within-group differences were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test.
Figure 1Serum levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, and 25(OH)-Vitamin D in patients with III degree bilateral varicocele and varicocelectomized controls. Serum PTH levels significantly increased after one (T1), two (T2), and three (T3) years of follow-up compared to the values at enrolment (T0) in the patient group. Compared to controls, patients showed significantly higher PTH serum levels at T1, T2, and T3. (A). Serum calcium levels were significantly higher in T3 vs. T0 in the patient group. Compared to controls, patients showed significantly higher calcium serum levels at each assessed time. (B). Serum 25(OH)-Vitamin D levels significantly decreased over time in the patient group. Compared to controls, patients showed significantly lower 25(OH)-Vitamin D serum levels at each assessed time. (Panel (C)). * p < 0.05 vs. T0; † p < 0.05 vs. T1; ‡ p < 0.05.