| Literature DB >> 35159801 |
Yuanhao Zhao1, Mengyu Zong1, Jie Zheng1, Zhen Zhang2,3, Qianqian Peng1, Shouzhen Jiang1, Jie Liu1, Jingjing Liu1, Liangbi Su2,3.
Abstract
We demonstrated a passively Q-switched Er:Ca0.8Sr0.2F2 laser with indium tin oxide nanowire arrays as an optical modulator in the mid-infrared region. In the Q-switched regime, the maximum output power of 58 mW with a slope efficiency of 18.3% was acquired. Meanwhile, the minimum pulse duration and highest repetition rate of the stable pulse trains were 490 ns and 17.09 kHz, corresponding to single pulse energy of 3.4 μJ and peak power of 6.93 W, respectively. To the best of our knowledge it was the first time that indium tin oxide nanowire arrays were employed as a saturable absorber to make pulse lasers carried out at 2.8 μm. The experimental data show that indium tin oxide nanowire arrays can be employed as a competitive candidate for saturable absorber in the field of mid-infrared solid-state lasers.Entities:
Keywords: mid-infrared laser; nanowire arrays; passively Q-switched; saturable absorber
Year: 2022 PMID: 35159801 PMCID: PMC8840723 DOI: 10.3390/nano12030454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Energy level configuration diagram of Er3+ ions.
Figure 2Characterizations of ITO-NWAs surface topography and nonlinear transmission: (a) the SEM image at a 200 nm scale, (b) the nonlinear transmission at 2.8 μm.
Figure 3(a) Average output power versus the absorbed pump power for CW lasers at 2.8 μm; (b) the spectra for the 2.8 μm CW lasers; inset (c) shows 3D light intensity distribution.
Figure 4Experimental configurations for Q-switched laser.
Figure 5Average output power when T = 3% and 5% of the Q-switched lasers at 2.8 μm.
Figure 6Pulse width (a), pulse repetition rate (b), single pulse energy (c) and peak power (d) when T = 3% and 5% of the Q-switched lasers at 2.8 μm.
Performances of the passively Q-switched laser under different OCs.
| Transmittance of the OC | Output Power/mW | Shortest Pulse Width/ns | Repetition Rate/kHz | Peak Power/W | Single Pulse Energy/μJ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T = 3% | 35 | 620 | 3.07 | 18.41 | 11.41 |
| T = 5% | 58 | 490 | 17.09 | 6.93 | 3.4 |
Figure 7Typical Q-switched pulse trains at 2.8 μm when T = 5%.
Comparison of passively Q-switched laser performances at 2.8 μm.
| Gain Medium | SA | Shortest Pulse Width/ns | Peak Power/W | Maximum Pulse Energy/μJ | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Er:ZBLAN | Black phosphorus | 1180 | / | 7.7 | 2015 [ |
| Er:Lu2O3 | MoS2 | 335 | 23.8 | 8.5 | 2016 [ |
| Er:Y2O3 | Black phosphorus | 4470 | 0.11 | 0.48 | 2016 [ |
| Er:CaF2 | Graphene | 1324 | 2.07 | 2.74 | 2016 [ |
| Er:YSGG | Bi2Te3/graphene | 243 | 5.14 | 1.25 | 2017 [ |
| Er:SrF2 | Bismuth nanosheets | 980 | 4.1 | 4.02 | 2018 [ |
| Er:Y2O3 | Graphene | 296 | 8.77 | 2.59 | 2018 [ |
| Er:CaF2 | Graphene | 632.9 | 5.85 | 3.7 | 2020 [ |
| Er:CaF2 | Bismuth nanosheets | 607 | 5.35 | 3.25 | 2020 [ |
| Er:Lu2O3 | MXene Nb2CTx | 223.7 | 16.96 | 3.79 | 2021 [ |
| Er:Ca0.8Sr0.2F2 | ITO-NWAs | 620 | 18.41 | 11.41 (T = 3%) | This work |
| 490 | 6.93 | 3.4 (T = 5%) |