| Literature DB >> 35159633 |
Shaolin Deng1, Tong Xing2, Chunbao Li1, Xinglian Xu1, Guanghong Zhou1.
Abstract
Indigenous chickens possess desirable characteristics and account for considerable proportions of the total chicken production in China. The current study examined the growth performance, carcass characteristics and muscle metabolites among a crossbred broiler and two indigenous, yellow-feathered chickens (Mahuang and Tuer) with different ages (60 and 75 days). Results indicated that the crossbred broiler had better feed efficiency, higher breast and thigh muscle yield, as well as a lower abdominal fat percentage than Mahuang and Tuer chickens (p < 0.05). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomics and multivariate analysis revealed sugars, amino acids and organic acids were the predominant metabolites that differed among the three chicken breeds. Growth performance and carcass traits of yellow-feathered chickens exhibited significant differences with the extension of the feeding period (p < 0.05). Moreover, differential metabolites reflected altered aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, ATP-binding cassette transporters, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, as well as glutathione metabolism in yellow-feathered chickens affected by age. Collectively, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the production efficiency and chemical composition of precursor flavor in Chinese indigenous, yellow-feathered chicken.Entities:
Keywords: age; carcass trait; flavor precursor; growth performance; indigenous chicken; metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35159633 PMCID: PMC8834177 DOI: 10.3390/foods11030483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet.
| Ingredient | Starter 1 | Grower 2 | Finisher 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 618.99 | 677.71 | 711.48 |
| Soybean meal (46%) | 229.89 | 140.69 | 100 |
| Cottonseed meal (46%) | 50 | 60 | 60 |
| Corn gluten meal (60%) | 50 | 57.12 | 61.2 |
| Soybean oil | 10.2 | 21 | 26.6 |
| Limestone | 13.7 | 14.3 | 14.3 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 12.4 | 10.3 | 8.7 |
| Sodium chloride | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 |
| Choline Chloride (60%) | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Premix 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Lysine (70%) | 4.49 | 6.86 | 6.83 |
| Methionine (98%) | 1.29 | 2.38 | 1.46 |
| Threonine (98%) | 0.34 | 1.24 | 1.13 |
| Mold inhibitor | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Calculated nutrient content | |||
| Metabolisable energy (kcal/kg) | 2900 | 3030 | 3100 |
| Crude protein | 20.5 | 18 | 17 |
| Calcium | 0.9 | 0.85 | 0.8 |
| Phosphorus | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.49 |
| Available phosphorus | 0.351 | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Lysine | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.88 |
| Methionine + cysteine | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.65 |
| Threonine | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.58 |
| Arginine | 1.22 | 1.02 | 0.92 |
1 For 817 crossbred broiler, the starter phase is 1–21 d. For Wens yellow-feathered Mahuang and Tuer chickens, the starter phase is 1–25 d. 2 For 817 crossbred broiler, the grower phase is 22–42 d. For Wens yellow-feathered Mahuang and Tuer chickens, the grower phase is 26–55 d. 3 For 817 crossbred broiler, the finisher phase is 43–55 d. For Wens yellow-feathered Mahuang and Tuer chickens, the finisher phase is 56–75 d. 4 Premix provided per kilogram of diet: Cu, 5.00 mg; Fe, 69.00 mg; Zn, 84.00 mg; Mn, 98.6 mg; I, 1.14 mg; Se, 0.30 mg; vitamin A (retinyl acetate), 15,000 IU; vitamin D (cholecalciferol), 3000 IU; vitamin E (dl-α-tocopheryl acetate), 25.5 IU; vitamin K3, 2.1 mg; vitamin B1, 2.4 mg; vitamin B2, 9 mg; vitamin B6, 5.1 mg; vitamin B12, 0.02 mg; Calpan, 12 mg; niacin, 48 mg; folic acid, 1.2 mg; biotin, 0.06 mg; Roxarsone, 50 mg; salinomycin, 90 mg.
Effect of breed and age on the growth performance of Chinese indigenous chickens 1.
| Items | Groups 2 | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | MH60 | MH75 | TE60 | TE75 | |||
| BW (g) | 1.99 d | 2.17 c | 2.72 a | 1.91 d | 2.40 b | 0.03 | <0.001 |
| ADFI (g/bird/day) | 70.26 c | 83.95 b | 93.93 a | 73.40 c | 81.99 b | 1.20 | <0.001 |
| ADG (g/bird/day) | 35.53 a | 36.02 a | 36.27 a | 31.65 b | 31.83 b | 0.39 | <0.001 |
| F/G (g/g) | 1.98 c | 2.33 b | 2.59 a | 2.32 b | 2.58 a | 0.02 | <0.001 |
1 The results are represented as the mean and SEM (n = 6). Different letters (a–d) in a line indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 2 CON, 817 Crossbred chicken raised for 55 d; MH60 and MH75, Wens Yellow-Feathered Mahuang chicken raised for 60 and 75 d; TE60 and TE75, Wens Yellow-Feathered Tuer chicken raised for 60 and 75 d.
Effect of breed and age on the carcass traits of Chinese indigenous chickens 1.
| Items | Groups 2 | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | MH60 | MH75 | TE60 | TE75 | |||
| Carcass weight (g) | 1798.00 d | 1952.43 c | 2511.04 a | 1741.21 d | 2214.98 b | 23.58 | <0.001 |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 90.31 c | 90.05 c | 92.19 a | 91.05 b | 92.23 a | 0.13 | <0.001 |
| Eviscerated yield (%) | 79.86 b | 77.87 d | 81.14 a | 78.93 c | 79.75 b | 0.18 | <0.001 |
| Breast muscle weight (g) | 272.76 b | 194.46 d | 286.61 a | 194.14 d | 227.39 c | 3.44 | <0.001 |
| Breast muscle (%) | 17.16 a | 11.53 d | 12.96 b | 12.86 b | 11.88 c | 0.12 | <0.001 |
| Thigh muscle weight (g) | 313.86 c | 313.86 c | 417.73 a | 276.73 d | 343.30 b | 5.07 | <0.001 |
| Thigh muscle (%) | 19.73 a | 18.60 cd | 18.90 b | 18.33 cd | 17.93 d | 0.17 | <0.001 |
| Abdominal fat weight (g) | 27.14 c | 41.21 b | 56.97 a | 37.72 b | 57.25 a | 1.91 | <0.001 |
| Abdominal fat (%) | 1.67 c | 2.37 b | 2.51 b | 2.43 b | 2.89 a | 0.09 | <0.001 |
1 The results are represented as the mean and SEM (n = 48). Different letters (a–d) in a line indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). 2 CON, 817 Crossbred chicken raised for 55 d; MH60 and MH75, Wens Yellow-Feathered Mahuang chicken raised for 60 and 75 d; TE60 and TE75, Wens Yellow-Feathered Tuer chicken raised for 60 and 75 d.
Figure 1Score plots of orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analyses (OPLS−DA) derived from the GC−MS profiles of muscle samples obtained from the MH60 group vs. the CON group (A), the MH75 group vs. the CON group (B), the TE60 group vs. the CON group (C), the TE75 group vs. the CON group (D), the MH60 group vs. the TE60 group (E), the MH75 group vs. the TE75 group (F), the MH75 group vs. the MH60 group (G) and the TE75 group vs. the TE60 group (H).
Figure 2Metabolite set enrichment analysis was performed using all of the discriminating metabolites identified by the four individual orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analyses (OPLS-DA) models. The top 20 metabolic pathways were obtained from the MH60 group vs. the CON group (A), the MH75 group vs. the CON group (B), the TE60 group vs. the CON group (C) and the TE75 group vs. the CON group (D). The ordinate represents -log(p). Bars that exceed the blue and red dotted lines indicate pathways with p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 3Metabolite set enrichment analysis was performed using all of the discriminating metabolites identified by the individual orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analyses (OPLS-DA) models. The most impacted pathways (p < 0.05) were obtained from the MH60 group vs. the TE60 group (A), the MH75 group vs. the TE75 group (B), the MH75 group vs. the MH60 group (C) and the TE75 group vs. the TE60 group (D). The size of the dot represents the metabolite number, and the color indicates the degree of statistical significance.