| Literature DB >> 35159630 |
Zuzana Šmídová1, Jana Rysová1.
Abstract
Gluten, a protein fraction from wheat, rye, barley, oats, their hybrids and derivatives, is very important in baking technology. The number of people suffering from gluten intolerance is growing worldwide, and at the same time, the need for foods suitable for a gluten-free diet is increasing. Bread and bakery products are an essential part of the daily diet. Therefore, new naturally gluten-free baking ingredients and new methods of processing traditional ingredients are sought. The study discusses the use of additives to replace gluten and ensure the stability and elasticity of the dough, to improve the nutritional quality and sensory properties of gluten-free bread. The current task is to extend the shelf life of gluten-free bread and bakery products and thus extend the possibility of its distribution in a fresh state. This work is also focused on various technological possibilities of gluten-free bread and the preparation of bakery products.Entities:
Keywords: bakery products; bread; cereals; enzymes; gluten-free products; sourdough
Year: 2022 PMID: 35159630 PMCID: PMC8834121 DOI: 10.3390/foods11030480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Gluten structure from the UNIPROT database https://www.uniprot.org/ (accessed date 31 January 2022) [6]. The picture shows (a) glutenin LMW subunit; (b) α,β-gliadin; (c) γ-gliadin; (d) glutenin HMW subunit. AlphaFold produces a per-residue confidence score (pLDDT) between 0 and 100. Some regions with low pLDDT may be unstructured in isolation. The colours represent the model confidence: dark blue–Very high (pLDDT > 90); light blue–Confident (90 > pLDDT > 70); yellow –Low (70 > pLDDT > 50); red–Very low (pLDDT < 50).
Figure 2Scanning electron micrograph of the gluten dough prepared in Brabender Farinograph from a wheat flour after 8 min. of mixing (FI-8, magnification: 2600×). Adapted from [7].
Nutritional values of wheat flour and gluten-free bread baking mixtures. The values were obtained from the product packages or available on https://itesco.cz/ (accessed on 24 January 2022).
| Flour | Wheat Flour | Gluten-Free 1 | Gluten-Free 2 | Gluten-Free 3 | Gluten-Free 4 | Gluten-Free 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutritional Values | per 100 g | per 100 g | per 100 g | per 100 g | per 100 g | per 100 g |
| Energy (kJ) | 1430 | 1517 | 919 | 1490 | 1497 | 1475 |
| Energy (kcal) | 337 | 362 | 219 | 356 | 358 | 351 |
| Fats (g) | 1 | 1.9 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 5.6 | 0.9 |
| of which saturates (g) | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 69 | 81.9 | 42 | 84 | 66 | 80 |
| of which sugars (g) | 2 | 3.8 | <0.5 | <0.5 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Proteins (g) | 12 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 7.2 | 2.7 |
| Fiber (g) | 2 | - | 1.1 | - | 6.0 | 4.4 |
| Salt (g) | <0.005 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0.83 |
Nutritional values of wheat buns and gluten-free buns. These values were obtained from the product packages or available on https://itesco.cz/ (accessed on 24 January 2022).
| Fresh Bun | Conventional | Gluten-Free |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional Values | per 100 g | per 100 g |
| Energy (kJ) | 1352 | 1144 |
| Energy (kcal) | 320 | 272 |
| Fats (g) | 5.4 | 8.9 |
| of which saturates (g) | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 55.8 | 42 |
| of which sugars (g) | 1.2 | 3.9 |
| Proteins (g) | 10.0 | 4.4 |
| Fiber (g) | 2.9 | 3.1 |
| Salt (g) | 1.5 | 1.3 |
The table shows the generalized differences between wheat dough and bread and between gluten-free dough and bread. Adapted and modified according to [34,36,37,38,39,40].
| Wheat Flours | Gluten-Free Flours | |
|---|---|---|
| Raw materials | ||
| swelling | good | better |
| Dough | ||
| repeated kneading | yes | no |
| stickiness | no/small | typically high |
| Dynamic oscillation rheometry | ||
| G’storage modul | lower | higher |
| G´´loss modul | lower | higher |
| phase angle tg(d) | higher | lower |
| Extensograph | ||
| extensibility | high | poor |
| extensibility resistance | high | mostly lower |
| R/E ratio | mostly lower | mostly higher |
| area under the curve (extensibility energy) | high | very low |
| Farinograph | ||
| development time | low | different according to the raw material |
| stability | high | different according to the raw material |
| degree of softening | not a clear trend | not a clear trend |
| water binding | mostly lower | mostly higher |
| Bread | ||
| volume | high | low |
| crust color | darker | light |
| crust | crunchy | more moist, dense |
| crumb elasticity | good | low |
| porosity | good | low |
| pore size | large | small |
| staling rate | slow | faster |
| crust moisture | optimal | more moist |
| crumbliness | low | significantly higher |
| hardness | soft | higher |
Figure 3Images of dough samples containing starch with zein, thermally treated-zein (zein heated in vacuum at 160 °C, Z-V-160) and gluten. Adapted from [46]. The white arrows in the image represent the scale-they indicate the distance of 20 µm.
Figure 4Innovative food packaging systems adapted and modified from [96,101]. Synergies between particular packaging types are marked with brackets.