Literature DB >> 35156816

Ratiometric pH-Responsive 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents Based on Hydrazone Switches.

Dawid Janasik1, Krzysztof Jasiński2, Władysław P Węglarz2, Ivan Nemec3,4, Pawel Jewula3, Tomasz Krawczyk1.   

Abstract

Hydrazone-based molecular switches serve as efficient ratiometric pH-sensitive agents that can be tracked with 19F NMR/MRI and 1H NMR. Structural changes induced between pH 3 and 4 lead to signal appearance and disappearance at 1H and 19F NMR spectra allowing ratiometric pH measurements. The most pronounced are resonances of the CF3 group shifted by 1.8 ppm with 19F NMR and a hydrazone proton shifted by 2 ppm with 1H NMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35156816      PMCID: PMC8892427          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


The measurement of pH is a fundamental aspect of chemical research. Many tools have been developed for this purpose, and visual indicators[1] and pH-sensitive electrodes[2] are commonplace in almost every laboratory. More sophisticated techniques were proposed for medicinal diagnostic, where a deviation from physiological pH indicates various pathological changes. For example, gastroesophageal reflux disease manifests an esophageal pH < 4[3,4] while solid tumors are more acidic (pH 6.2–7.0) than normal tissue (pH ∼ 7.5).[5,6] Very low pH is also observed during cellular studies of lysosomes 4.0–5.0.[7,8] The procedures used for pH measurements in medicine rely on microelectrodes and several imaging techniques such as electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), positron emission tomography (PET), photoacoustic imaging (PAI), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).[9] MRI is a noninvasive diagnostic tool for soft tissues that uses the magnetic properties of the 1H nucleus. It is one of the most widely used imaging procedures in medicine and offers excellent spatial resolution and unlimited penetration depth and provides knowledge that cannot be accessed by other means.[10,11] In order to improve the quality of the images, 19F MRI has been extensively investigated as a complementary modality that allows so-called hot spot imaging.[12,13] Since 19F atoms are not present in soft tissues, this modality allows for the accurate representation of the targeted organ without background signals; however, it requires the introduction of an appropriate contrast agent containing 19F nuclei into the organism.[14] Regarding the 19F NMR or MRI as an aid in pH measurements, several molecular probes have been developed. The earliest reports concerned fluorinated aniline derivatives, whose mechanism of action was based on protonation of the aniline nitrogen, which changed the chemical shift of the fluorine atom.[15−17] Other concepts utilized PEGylated nanogels containing perfluorocarbons,[18] C6F6-loaded Au-fluorescent mesoporous silica nanoparticles,[19] or copolymers.[20−23] In those cases, the mechanism of pH-depended signal changes was either based on the reversible volume phase transition of the nanogel, which emitted an 19F NMR signal, or the irreversible decomposition of the capsule under the influence of pH and the release of fluoroorganic groups, respectively.[24] In each case, a single 19F signal with a pH-dependent chemical shift was observed. A probe displaying two separate signals with pH-dependent integral ratios (allowing internal reference and ratiometric measurements) would be more convenient for diagnostic purposes. Hydrazone-based molecular switches could be used in such a role. Molecular switches are usually defined as molecules that can reversibly transform between two (or more) thermodynamically stable states.[25,26] Such compounds are sensitive to external stimuli such as light, pH, or electric current and include photochromic switches, host–guest switches, and rotaxanes.[27−29] The main applications of molecular switches is expected to include molecular electronics (high-density data storage) or organic diodes.[30] They have been also reported as chemosensors or fluorescence imaging agents.[31,32] Here, we demonstrate the first application of ratiometric reversible hydrazone-based molecular switches as 19F NMR/MRI pH-responsive compounds based on chemical shift changes. The structures (Figure ) were derived from Aprahamian’s hydrazone switch.[33] The synthesis of hydrazones 1-E, 2-E, and 3-E involved coupling trifluoromethylanilines with ethyl pyridyl-acetate.[34] Briefly, trifluoromethylaniline in EtOH was treated with concentrated HCl and then NaNO2 at 0 °C to give trifluoromethyl-1-benzenediazonium chloride. In a separate flask, ethyl-2-pyridyl-acetate was treated at 0 °C with sodium acetate in EtOH–H2O (8:1). These two solutions were combined and stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and then overnight at RT. The resultant reaction mixture was washed with methylene chloride, and the organic fraction was washed twice with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and dried over magnesium sulfate. The crude product was subjected to column chromatography (SiO2, CH2Cl2–MeOH, 8:1) to give pure compounds as an orange solid (yields, 55–65%).
Figure 1

Chemical structures of fluorinated hydrazones.

Chemical structures of fluorinated hydrazones. According to X-ray crystallography, the structures were nearly planar, and H-bonding between the N–H proton and the pyridine nitrogen subunit was observed (Figure S13). The 1H NMR spectra of molecular switches (Figure ) in CD3CN showed a characteristic H-bonded N–H resonance around 15 ppm, in addition to the expected aromatic and aliphatic signals.
Figure 2

19F NMR (left) and 1H NMR (right) spectra (400 MHz) in CD3CN; (top) 1-E (red), 2-E (green), and 3-E (blue); (bottom) Z-H+ recorded after the addition of 1.6 equiv of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).

19F NMR (left) and 1H NMR (right) spectra (400 MHz) in CD3CN; (top) 1-E (red), 2-E (green), and 3-E (blue); (bottom) Z-H+ recorded after the addition of 1.6 equiv of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The N–H chemical shift indicates that the pyridine nitrogen is H-bonded with the N–H proton. A careful look at the 1H NMR spectrum shows a small signal near 12 ppm stemming from the minor Z configuration. The calculated geometries (B3LYP/6-31G(d, p) level of theory) of the two configurations in CD3CN showed that the E configuration is more stable than Z, which is in agreement with the isomer ratio observed in the 1H NMR spectrum. The addition of 1.6 equiv of TFA to CD3CN solutions of 1-E, 2-E, and 3-E protonated the pyridine subunit, which was accompanied by a color change in the solution from light yellow to orange (Figure c) and drastic changes in the 1H NMR and 19F NMR spectra (Figure ).
Figure 3

Changes in the UV–vis spectrum during the acid/base switching of 1-E. All data were recorded in MeCN at 298 K using a 1.2 × 10–4 M solution of 1-E. Spectra a and e are overlapping.

Changes in the UV–vis spectrum during the acid/base switching of 1-E. All data were recorded in MeCN at 298 K using a 1.2 × 10–4 M solution of 1-E. Spectra a and e are overlapping. First, the N–H proton signals at 15 ppm disappeared, and new signals appeared at 13 ppm. This shift indicates that rotation around the C=N bond has occurred (E/Z isomerization) and that the N–H proton formed a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of the ester subunit, yielding Z-H+. Second, the pyridine proton signals shifted upfield, which is typical for protonated pyridine rings (Figure S9). In the 19F NMR spectra, peaks from the −CF3 group can be seen near −62.0 ppm. With the addition of TFA, these peaks moved toward higher frequencies for 1-E and 3-E, and those for the 2-E peak moved toward a lower frequency. For the o-isomer (1-E), the greatest change in the chemical shift was −1.8 ppm. The 19F NMR signals were sharper (8 Hz) than the N–H signals recorded by 1H NMR (25 Hz) (width at half the peak height). To better describe the switching process, the Z-H+ molar fraction was calculated (based on peak integrals) and plotted against the pH of the solution (Figure ). It can be seen that the switching process occurred between pH 4 and 3, and the range is practically identical for all isomers. The relationship from Figure can be used for determination of the pH of a solution. Within the 3–4 range, it is possible with a standard uncertainty of 0.05 pH units. Outside this range, the pH can be estimated as either >4 or <3.
Figure 4

Representation of the pH-dependent switching process. Error bars represents standard uncertainy assuming 5% accuracy of the peak integration.

Representation of the pH-dependent switching process. Error bars represents standard uncertainy assuming 5% accuracy of the peak integration. Upon the addition of 1.6 equiv of triethylamine (TEA) to the CD3CN solution of Z-H+, the color of the solution changed back to light yellow (Figure e). The 1H NMR and 19F NMR spectra (Figures S9–S11), recorded immediately after the addition of TEA, showed the complete disappearance of Z-H+ and the presence of both 1-E and 1-Z in solution. This is evident from the disappearance of the H-bonded N–H peak at 13 ppm and the appearance of two H-bonded N–H peaks (a larger one at 15 ppm and a smaller one at 12 ppm), which were assigned to E and Z, respectively. In each case, the T1 and T2 relaxation times of the fluorine atom of the E- and Z-H+ isomers were 1.4–1.6 s and did not change significantly during acidification (Figures S16–S18). Such behavior greatly simplifies the imaging procedure, as only variations of chemical shifts must be taken into account. Since the pH-dependent chemical shift changes are relatively large, the compounds can be used in the MRI of pH gradients. Figure shows the 19F MRI images of acetonitrile solutions (15 mM) of 1, which display the highest impact of pH on the chemical shift of the CF3 functionality. The images were acquired with the appropriate RF excitation pulse frequency and bandwidth of 0.5 ppm to cover the resonance frequencies of the isomers (Figure C,E,I). The required acquisition times were 15 min and only 2 min for FLASH and RARE sequences, respectively. We were also able to perform analogous imaging with compound 3 (Figure S15). Unfortunately, the difference in chemical shifts for the isomers of compound 2 (0.1 ppm) turned out to be too small to register good-quality images within a reasonable time. While the chemical shift of the Z isomer showed a certain pH dependence (Figures S9–S11), the spectral distance between the 19F lines of the E and Z isomers was large enough to obtain separate images for the entire range of pH values. If necessary, it is possible to increase the RF pulse bandwidth for MR imaging to determine the presence of the Z isomer and cover its entire pH-dependent range of chemical shifts.
Figure 5

19F MRI of compound 1 in CH3CN. (A,D,G) RF excitation pulse at −60.9 ppm with 0.5 ppm bandwidth; (B,E,H) RF excitation pulse at −62.7 ppm with 0.5 ppm bandwidth; (C,F,I) corresponding 19F NMR spectra.

19F MRI of compound 1 in CH3CN. (A,D,G) RF excitation pulse at −60.9 ppm with 0.5 ppm bandwidth; (B,E,H) RF excitation pulse at −62.7 ppm with 0.5 ppm bandwidth; (C,F,I) corresponding 19F NMR spectra. To explain the differences in the 19F NMR chemical shifts for the isomers 1-E, 2-E, and 3-E, we performed DFT calculations to visualize their molecular orbitals. The shape of the orbitals clearly indicates an increased density of electrons in the o- and p-positions (Table S2), while a much lower density was observed at the m-positions. This is due to a mesomeric effect in which the nitrogen of the hydrazone group is an electron donor to the aromatic ring. The distinct range of changes in chemical shifts in the 19F NMR spectrum during E/Z configuration switching in compounds 1–3 can be explained based on the differences in the binding energies of the hydrazone hydrogen. For the E configuration, the bond was stronger (N–H---N), and for the Z configuration, it was weaker (N–H---O).[35] Thus, the stronger bond polarization in the E configuration increased the electron-donating properties of the pyridyl nitrogen, which increased the electron density at the o- and p-positions. The highest change in the chemical shift was coupled with the biggest change in energy during switching for the o-isomer, as demonstrated in Figure . Additionally, the −CF3 group at the o-position was surrounded by strongly electronegative atoms (oxygen or nitrogen), which significantly impacted the magnetic properties of fluorine atoms.
Figure 6

Calculated energy diagram for E/Z configuration changes of compounds 1, 2, and 3.

Calculated energy diagram for E/Z configuration changes of compounds 1, 2, and 3. Although the E isomers showed poor water solubility, they were highly soluble (>20–40 mg/mL) in polar organic solvents, and their protonated forms (Z-H+ isomers) were slightly soluble in water (Table S5). In practical applications for 19F MRI in medical diagnostics, insoluble fluoroorganic compounds are typically used as aqueous emulsions.[36] In the case of 1, we prepared a stable vegetable oil–water emulsion with pluronic-127 as a surfactant. The emulsion showed similar features in 19F NMR and 19F MRI experiments as the acetonitrile solution, except for higher peak widths of 80 Hz compared with 8 Hz in solution (Figures S19 and S21), which are still comparable to the RF pulse bandwidths used in previous MRI experiments. In conclusion, we obtained a series of hydrazone molecular switches containing the −CF3 functionality. This allowed the visualization of the switching process by 19F NMR, 1H NMR, UV–vis, and 19F MRI in the low (millimolar) concentration range with a short acquisition time in both polar organic solvents or aqueous emulsions. The chemical shift changes for the 1-E isomer were surprisingly large, which opens possibilities for applications of such molecular switches as smart MRI contrast agents. Further research is currently in progress in our laboratory to tune the pH-switching range and improve their aqueous solubility. The latter should be achieved by the introduction of polyethylene glycol or carbohydrate functionalities.[37]
  32 in total

1.  Modulating lysosomal pH: a molecular and nanoscale materials design perspective.

Authors:  Jialiu Zeng; Orian S Shirihai; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Life Sci (Westlake Village)       Date:  2020-12

2.  Contrast agents for MRI: 30+ years and where are we going?

Authors:  Valérie C Pierre; Matthew J Allen; Peter Caravan
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Free cytosolic Ca2+ measurements with fluorine labelled indicators using 19FNMR.

Authors:  J C Metcalfe; T R Hesketh; G A Smith
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 6.817

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Raul Badillo; Dawn Francis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-08-06

5.  Isomerization mechanism in hydrazone-based rotary switches: lateral shift, rotation, or tautomerization?

Authors:  Shainaz M Landge; Ekatarina Tkatchouk; Diego Benítez; Don Antoine Lanfranchi; Mourad Elhabiri; William A Goddard; Ivan Aprahamian
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation.

Authors:  I F Tannock; D Rotin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Poly-beta-cyclodextrin based platform for pH mapping via a ratiometric 19F/1H MRI method.

Authors:  Eliana Gianolio; Roberta Napolitano; Franco Fedeli; Francesca Arena; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 8.  Perfluorocarbons-Based 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Biomedicine.

Authors:  Lina Wu; Fang Liu; Shuang Liu; Xiuan Xu; Zhaoxi Liu; Xilin Sun
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-10-02

Review 9.  Visual pH Sensors: From a Chemical Perspective to New Bioengineered Materials.

Authors:  Luigi Di Costanzo; Barbara Panunzi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Reversible Photoswitching and Isomer-Dependent Diffusion of Single Azobenzene Tetramers on a Metal Surface.

Authors:  Christophe Nacci; Massimo Baroncini; Alberto Credi; Leonhard Grill
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 15.336

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.