Longfei Xu1,2, Yishan Cheng1, Jinchuan Zhang1,2, Yang Liu1,2, Yuanyuan Yang1,2. 1. School of Energy and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Strategy Evaluation for Shale Gas, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China.
Abstract
The marine-continental transitional shale with favorable geological conditions for shale gas accumulation and broad resource prospects is widely distributed in China, which is also well developed in the Ordos Basin. The reservoir characteristic and gas-bearing properties of the transitional Shanxi Formation shale have been studied in previous studies. However, the factors influencing the organic matter (OM) accumulation have not been well studied, which restricts shale gas exploration and development of the Shanxi Formation in the Ordos Basin. According to analyses of organic geochemistry, mineral compositions, and major and trace elements, this paper has studied the paleoenvironment characteristic and its influence on the OM accumulation of the Shanxi Formation shale. The results indicate that the OM is characterized by the high mature stage and type III kerogen while the total organic content (TOC) of Member 1 is higher than that of Member 2. From Member 1 to Member 2, the paleowater depth gradually decreases, along with a gradually relative cold and dry climate, decreasing the terrestrial influx intensity and paleoproductivity and increasing the oxygen content in the water column. For Member 1, the OM accumulation is mainly controlled by the terrestrial influx intensity and paleowater depth, and other paleoenvironment factors have an unobvious contribution to the OM accumulation. For Member 2, the OM accumulation is commonly controlled by the weak terrestrial influx, low paleoproductivity, and oxic water column, resulting in the low TOC of Member 2. This study reveals the paleoenvironment characteristic and controls on the OM accumulation of the Shanxi Formation shale, which is beneficial to the reservoir selection of the Shanxi Formation in the southeastern Ordos Basin and the understanding of the OM accumulation in other transitional shales.
The marine-continental transitional shale with favorable geological conditions for shale gas accumulation and broad resource prospects is widely distributed in China, which is also well developed in the Ordos Basin. The reservoir characteristic and gas-bearing properties of the transitional Shanxi Formation shale have been studied in previous studies. However, the factors influencing the organic matter (OM) accumulation have not been well studied, which restricts shale gas exploration and development of the Shanxi Formation in the Ordos Basin. According to analyses of organic geochemistry, mineral compositions, and major and trace elements, this paper has studied the paleoenvironment characteristic and its influence on the OM accumulation of the Shanxi Formation shale. The results indicate that the OM is characterized by the high mature stage and type III kerogen while the total organic content (TOC) of Member 1 is higher than that of Member 2. From Member 1 to Member 2, the paleowater depth gradually decreases, along with a gradually relative cold and dry climate, decreasing the terrestrial influx intensity and paleoproductivity and increasing the oxygen content in the water column. For Member 1, the OM accumulation is mainly controlled by the terrestrial influx intensity and paleowater depth, and other paleoenvironment factors have an unobvious contribution to the OM accumulation. For Member 2, the OM accumulation is commonly controlled by the weak terrestrial influx, low paleoproductivity, and oxic water column, resulting in the low TOC of Member 2. This study reveals the paleoenvironment characteristic and controls on the OM accumulation of the Shanxi Formation shale, which is beneficial to the reservoir selection of the Shanxi Formation in the southeastern Ordos Basin and the understanding of the OM accumulation in other transitional shales.
Shale gas, which is one
of the most important unconventional natural
gas resources, has obtained more attention in recent years and made
a great breakthrough around the world.[1−7] Meanwhile, the exploration and development of shale gas have developed
rapidly in China. Based on efforts made in previous years, Chinese
shale gas production has reached 200 × 108 m3 in 2020, ranking among the top three in the world and effectively
relieving the pressure of Chinese natural gas demand. Shale gas in
China is controlled by the complex tectonic geological background,
and there are many types of shale gas reservoirs, which are widely
distributed in marine, continental, and marine–continental
transitional shales.[4,6,8−10]Marine shale gas is the main research direction
in China and has
made a series of important breakthroughs in recent years. With regard
to the accumulation mechanism, controlling factors on enrichment,
geological model, and resource prospect of shale gas, previous studies
have established the accumulation model and the relatively systematic
geological theory of marine shale gas in southern China.[4,11−14] However, compared with the development of marine shale gas, the
transitional shale with a large distribution area and great resource
potential lacks systematic research and has not yet made a breakthrough.[11,15] The transitional shale is mainly distributed in the Carboniferous–Permian
period in China, including the Northern China platform (the Ordos
Basin, the Southern North China Basin, the Qinshui Basin, and the
Bohaiwan Basin) and the Yangtze platform.[11,16−18] The Ordos Basin, located in the central area of sedimentary
basins in China, is one of the most important petroliferous basins.
Meanwhile, the transitional shales in the Ordos Basin mainly distributed
in the Benxi, Taiyuan, and Shanxi Formation have been the focus of
shale gas exploration in recent years.[19,20] Several studies
indicate that the thick Shanxi Formation shale characterized by humic
OM, high TOC, and high organic maturity is widely distributed in the
Ordos Basin and has good hydrocarbon generation conditions and reservoir
forming potential.[21−23] Meanwhile, some gas well data reveal that the Shanxi
Formation shale in the southeastern Ordos Basin has a relatively good
gas-bearing property, for example, the shale gas content in the Yunyeping-1
well ranges from 0.6 to 4.1 m3/t, with the daily gas production
of 2.0 × 104 m3, while the daily gas production
in the Yunyeping-3 well and Yunyeping-6 well is 5.3 × 104 and 3.0 × 104 m3, respectively.[24,25]However, studies on the transitional shales in the Ordos Basin
regarding the Benxi, Taiyuan, and Shanxi Formation as a whole are
mainly concentrated on characteristics of the reservoir physical property
and gas-bearing property, which are lack of understanding about the
differences of the OM accumulation in each transitional formation.[26−28] Due to rapid changes in the paleoenvironment and complex sedimentary
facies in the Shanxi Formation, the lithology is complicated and the
distribution of OM is uneven in the formation.[11]OM is the material basis of shale gas accumulation,
which is influenced
by many factors such as sedimentary environment and material source
in geological history.[29−32] This study integrates TOC, mineral compositions, major and trace
elements to reveal the paleoclimate, paleosalinity, paleoproductivity,
paleowater depth, terrestrial influx, and paleoredox conditions of
the Shanxi Formation shale. Furthermore, based on the research of
the paleoenvironment, this study establishes accumulation mechanisms
of OM in different layers of the Shanxi Formation. The conclusions
are significant to the understanding of OM accumulation and reservoir
selection of the transitional Shanxi Formation shale in the southeastern
Ordos Basin, China.
Geological Setting
The Ordos Basin is a craton basin developed in the western area
of the Sino-Korean plate, which is the second-largest sedimentary
basin in China.[33−35] The Ordos Basin is composed of 6 secondary tectonic
units (Western edge thrust belt, Tianhuan depression, Yishan slope,
Jinxi flexure belt, Yimeng uplift, and Weibei uplift), which is abundant
in coal, petroleum, and natural gas[36−38] (Figure a).
Figure 1
(a) Tectonic units of the Ordos Basin and location
of the SX-1
well. (b) Sedimentary facies distribution of the Permian Shanxi Formation
in the Ordos Basin and its periphery (modified with permission from
Li, Zhang, LI, Chen, Guo, Ma, Feng, and Zhang[45]). (c) Stratigraphic section of Paleozoic in the southeastern Ordos
Basin (modified with permission from Xiao, Liu, Zhang, Lin, and Zhang[46]). (d) Lithology and sampling information of
the SX-1 well.
(a) Tectonic units of the Ordos Basin and location
of the SX-1
well. (b) Sedimentary facies distribution of the Permian Shanxi Formation
in the Ordos Basin and its periphery (modified with permission from
Li, Zhang, LI, Chen, Guo, Ma, Feng, and Zhang[45]). (c) Stratigraphic section of Paleozoic in the southeastern Ordos
Basin (modified with permission from Xiao, Liu, Zhang, Lin, and Zhang[46]). (d) Lithology and sampling information of
the SX-1 well.The study area is located in the
southeastern margin of the Yishan
slope, and its tectonic evolution is controlled by the Ordos Basin.
During the Archean-Early Proterozoic period, the basin experienced
four tectonic movements, namely, the Qianxi, Fuping, Wutai, and Lvliang
movements.[39] In the late Paleozoic, the
basin began the overall tectonic divergent evolution and was affected
by the Hercynian movement, which transformed from marine to continental
facies, and the climate gradually became dry.[40,41] In the Mesozoic period, the basin entered the evolution stage of
an inland lake basin, in which the basic pattern of the basin was
established.[42] In the Middle Triassic,
affected by the Indosinian movement, many faults, such as high-quality
source rocks, petroleum, and gas resources, were developed in the
basin.[43] In the late Cretaceous, the basin
was at the end of the Yanshan Movement, and its southeastern strata
experienced a continuous tectonic uplift, which resulted in the basin
pattern as a large monoclinic dip to the west.[44]In the Shanxi period, due to the Hercynian movement,
the basin
formed a unified subsidence depression. Meanwhile, the seawater rapidly
withdrew from the southeast of the basin, which led to the expansion
of land area, the subsidence center area of the basin was large, and
the material source was abundant.[35] The
basin developed alluvial plains, delta plains, delta fronts, and shallow
lakes from north to south. The late and early Shanxi Formation sedimentary
patterns are similar (Figure b). The main difference was the northward shift of the overall
sedimentary facies belt, the scale of the delta plain facies decreased,
and the scale of the delta front facies expanded.[45,47] The Shanxi Formation shale is one of the effective source rocks
in the Ordos Basin. From the information of the SX-1 well, the lithology
is composed of sandstone, coal, and dark shale, while the sandy content
decreases from top to bottom (Figure c). The organic matters of the Shanxi Formation shales
are mainly type II2 and III kerogen, the TOC is relatively
high, and the thermal evolution is in the mature stage.[33,48,49]
Samples
and Methods
The study well is located in the southeastern
Ordos Basin, near
Yanan City, Shanxi Province (Figure a). The coring information of the SX-1 well indicates
that the buried depth of the Shanxi Formation exceeds 3500 m, in which
the stratigraphy is dominated by fine sandstone, shale, coal, and
carbonaceous shale (Figure c). Member 1 and Member 2 each have a set of coal seams, and
the upper Member 2 has a higher sand content, while Member 1 has a
higher carbon content. To study the differences of OM abundance in
the Shanxi Formation, seven samples of Member 2 (SX1-1–SX1-7)
and seven samples of Member 1 (SX1-8–SX1-14) are collected
for relevant experiments, in which the lithology of samples is composed
of fine sandstone (SX1-4), argillaceous shale (SX1-1 and SX1-3), silty
shale (SX1-5 and SX1-7), shale (SX1-6 and SX1-12), carbonaceous shale
(SX1-2, SX1-8, SX1-10, SX1-11, SX1-13, and SX1-14), and coal (SX1-9).
In the Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Daqing
Oilfield Company Ltd and the Key Laboratory of Strategy Evaluation
for Shale Gas, Ministry of Natural Resources, China University of
Geosciences, Beijing, ten samples are taken for mineral composition
analysis, and all samples are analyzed for organic geochemistry and
major and trace elements.
Organic Petrographic and
Organic Geochemistry
Analysis
The vitrinite reflectance (Ro) is tested by an oil-immersed
reflection optical microscope, and the kerogen type dominated by maceral
compositions is observed through a light microscope. Samples tested
for the TOC value are ground into a powder <80 mesh and treated
with hydrochloric acid (HCl) to reduce the influence of carbonates.
Then, samples treated with acid are washed with distilled water and
analyzed for TOC through a LECO CS230 carbon/sulfur analyzer. Organic
maceral compositions are measured through a LEICA DM 6000 M microscope
photometry system, in which the kerogen type is determined with normal
white light.Pretreatments of samples, which include chloroform
extraction, methanol–acetone–benzene extraction (MAB
extraction), and kerogen preparation, are required prior to analysis
of kerogen carbon isotope (Corg). First, 100 g of sample
powder (<80 mesh) and 500 mL of pure chloroform are prepared for
chloroform extraction. The extraction process is set at 85 °C
for 17 h, and the extraction is completed when the fluorescence of
the extraction solution is below grade 3. Then, the MAB extraction
reagent is prepared in the proportion of 70% benzene, 15% acetone,
and 15% methanol, and the temperature is set at 120 °C for more
than 17 h. When the extraction solution is colorless, the MAB extraction
is completely followed by the reagent evaporated to dryness. Finally,
kerogen is prepared with the rock residue after chloroform extraction
and MAB extraction. The procedures are as follows: (1) Per gram of
the sample is added 6–8 mL of HCl with a concentration of 6
mol/L, which is stirred for 1–2 h at 60–70 °C,
washed with distilled water to neutral, and removed the clear liquid.
(2) Per gram of the sample is added to 2.4 mL of HCl with a concentration
of 6 mol/L and 3.6 mL of hydrofluoric acid (HF) with a concentration
of 40%, which is stirred for 2 h at 60–70 °C, and washed
with 1 mol/L HCl for three times to remove the clear liquid. (3) The
kerogen obtained from the acid treatment is put in a centrifuge tube,
added heavy liquid of 2.0–2.1 g/mL, dispersed by an oscillator,
and centrifuged for 20 min at a speed of 2000–3000 r/min in
a centrifuge. After a period of precipitation, the upper kerogen is
taken out, which should be repeated three times. The separated kerogen
should be frozen for 6 h at −5°C, taken out for drying
at 60 °C in an oven, ground to 100 mesh, and put into penicillin
bottles for later use. Finally, an appropriate amount of prepared
kerogen is oxidized into carbon dioxide and water in an oxidation
furnace, and by helium flow, the separated carbon dioxide is brought
into an ISOPRIME isotope mass spectrometer, which is produced by Germany
VG Company to determine Corg.
Mineral
Composition Analysis
Ten
samples of the Shanxi Formation, which are ground to less than 80
mesh to completely disperse minerals before the experiment, are selected
to analyze the mineral composition. The compositions are measured
by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Rigaku Ultima IV rotating anode
X-ray diffractometer with 40 kV and 40 mA.
Major
and Trace Element Composition Analysis
The samples are smashed
to powder to eliminate the influence of
minerals and particle size before the element experiment. The composition
is analyzed by an Axios Max X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer
with 60 kV and 160 mA.Trace-element concentrations are measured
by an ICAP-RQ inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS).
Samples are ground to less than 200 mesh and dried for 3 h at 105
°C in an oven. Then, 0.1 g of the sample is selected and dissolved
with 2 mL of HF, 2 mL of HCl, and 6 mL of nitric acid in a closed
container. The acid is cleared by an acid removal at 160 °C for
90 min and then tested by ICP-MS directly.Trace elements consist
of terrestrial detritus and authigenic fraction,
of which the authigenic fraction can record the paleoenvironmental
characteristics and changes in the water column.[50] However, biogenic carbonates and opal minerals in the sediments
can dilute the trace-element concentrations of authigenic components,
leading to deviations in studying the paleoenvironment directly from
the measured results. Therefore, when using trace elements as indexes,
the stable Al element is used to standardize trace-element concentrations,[51] and element contents of post-Archean Australian
shale (PAAS) are used to calculate the enrichment factor.[52] The calculation formula is as followswhere X represents
the concentration
of element X in samples, which is standardized with reference to the
concentration of element X in PAAS. If EF < 1, the element is deficient;
if EF > 1, the element is enriched.The concentration of
elements can be influenced by the paleoclimate
change in the sedimentary geological history. The contents of Fe,
Mn, Cr, V, Ni, and Co are relatively high in a warm and humid climate,
while the contents of Ca, Mg, K, Na, Sr, and Ba are relatively high
in a cold and dry climate because these elements are precipitated
in large quantities to form various salts and deposited on the water
bottom due to the enhanced alkalinity of water medium along with the
evaporation of water.[53] Therefore, these
elements can be used as a proxy for paleoclimate in the form of C-value, which is calculated as followsPaleoclimate can also influence the weathering
effect, resulting in that the chemical index of alteration (CIA) is
applied to evaluate the weathering intensity and indicate the paleoclimate
change.[54,55] Previous studies have shown that high CIA
values represent the substantial removal of mobile cations (e.g.,
Ca2+, Na+, K+) relative to stable
residual constituents (Al3+, Ti4+) through intensive
chemical weathering, likely under warm and humid conditions. Low CIA
values, however, indicate the near absence of chemical weathering,
thereby reflecting cool and/or arid conditions.[56] The formula of CIA is as followswhere the major elements
are all in molar
units and CaO* only refers to CaO in the silicate fraction. Because
of the low content of carbonate in the Shanxi Formation samples (Table ), CaO is corrected
by the P2O5 data (CaO* = CaO – 10/3 ×
P2O5).[57] If the mole
proportion of CaO* is more than that of Na2O, the CaO*
value is equaled to the Na2O value. Otherwise, the CaO*
value is equaled to the CaO value.[57,58] Meanwhile,
the calculation of CIA should consider the diagenetic addition of
K because of postdepositional K alteration in many pre-Paleozoic siliciclastic
sediments, nevertheless, the influence of K2O correction
on CIA is not significant in post-Paleozoic samples.[58−60] Therefore, this study has not corrected the diagenetic addition
of K.
Table 4
Oxide Contents of Major Elements in
the Shanxi Formation Samples (%)
member
sample
SiO2
Al2O3
MgO
Na2O
K2O
P2O5
TiO2
CaO
Fe2O3
MnO
Member
2
SX 1-1
55.968
36.130
1.514
1.344
2.814
0.037
0.569
0.101
1.342
0.005
SX1-2
57.137
35.581
1.342
1.133
2.418
0.028
0.529
0.098
1.540
0.009
SX1-3
56.183
34.590
0.000
1.161
2.788
0.100
0.583
0.240
3.765
0.052
SX1-4
56.709
30.885
1.491
1.218
2.632
0.053
0.574
0.156
5.593
0.117
SX1-5
59.925
20.621
0.831
0.760
3.189
0.202
0.654
0.682
7.892
0.166
SX1-6
56.146
35.824
1.340
1.198
2.519
0.050
0.615
0.104
1.999
0.027
SX1-7
58.992
35.180
1.078
0.977
1.986
0.061
0.617
0.103
0.833
0.006
Member 1
SX1-8
51.354
43.808
0.751
0.819
1.132
0.051
0.643
0.089
1.034
0.004
SX1-9
25.319
18.865
0.091
0.209
0.250
0.063
1.701
0.286
0.404
0.011
SX1-10
60.359
34.287
0.968
1.047
1.641
0.043
0.612
0.101
0.705
0.004
SX1-11
70.608
14.656
0.181
0.215
1.033
0.152
0.768
0.295
3.225
0.014
SX1-12
53.595
37.402
0.887
0.731
1.366
0.148
0.558
0.302
4.192
0.128
SX1-13
41.802
52.280
0.403
0.658
0.232
0.028
0.933
0.071
1.513
SX1-14
46.120
49.366
0.725
0.735
1.011
0.052
0.939
0.085
0.524
Results
Organic Petrographic and
Organic Geochemistry
Characteristics
TOC values and thermal maturity of samples
from Member 2 and Member 1 are listed in Table . TOC of Member 2 ranges from 0.33 to 2.19%
with an average value of 0.89%, while TOC of Member 1 shale samples
is in the range of 0.75–7.49% (averaging 3.82%), and the coal
sample (SX1-9) has a high TOC value of 42.74%. Ro of five samples
varies from 2.60 to 3.08% (averaging 2.90%), which indicates that
the Shanxi Formation samples are in the high mature stage.
Table 1
TOC Value and Thermal Maturity of
the Shanxi Formation Samples
formation
member
sample
TOC (%)
Ro (%)
Shanxi Formation
Member 2
SX1-1
0.44
SX1-2
0.33
SX1-3
1.04
SX1-4
0.37
SX1-5
2.19
2.60
SX1-6
0.68
SX1-7
1.21
Member 1
SX1-8
2.24
2.99
SX1-9
42.74
SX1-10
2.62
2.90
SX1-11
4.92
SX1-12
7.49
2.93
SX1-13
0.75
SX1-14
4.91
3.08
Maceral compositions of samples,
which are applied to identify
kerogen types, reveal that the kerogen of these samples is dominated
by sapropelinite, followed by inertinite, with a certain amount of
vitrinite and a low content of exinite (Table , Figure ). TI index is usually used to estimate the kerogen
type, which is as followsThe
calculation results show that the TI index
ranges from −89.92 to 39.92, indicating that the Shanxi Formation
kerogen is mainly composed of type II2 with a little type
III.
Table 2
Maceral Compositions, TI Index, and
Kerogen Type of the Shanxi Formation Samples
maceral
compositions (%)
sample
sapropelite
exinite
vitrinite
inertinite
TI index
Type
δ13Corg(‰)
type
SX1-5
0.00
0.00
40.33
59.67
–89.92
III
–23.73
III
SX1-8
68.33
0.67
6.67
24.33
39.33
II2
–23.78
III
SX1-10
67.67
0.33
5.33
26.67
37.17
II2
–23.96
III
SX1-12
69.00
0.33
5.67
25.00
39.92
II2
–25.00
III
SX1-14
68.00
0.67
7.00
24.33
38.75
II2
–24.36
III
Figure 2
Transmission polarized micrograph of kerogen.
Transmission polarized micrograph of kerogen.Maceral composition experiment can
be influenced by thermal maturity
and area of observation, which can result in errors in judging the
kerogen type. Therefore, this study uses kerogen carbon isotope to
further determine the kerogen type, which has been proved in previous
studies.[61] According to values of δ13Corg, the kerogen type is divided into four categories:
type I (−35 to −30‰), type II1 (−30
to to −27.5‰), type II2 (−27.5‰
to −25‰), and type III (≥−25‰).
Meanwhile, thermal maturity is an important factor when considering
kerogen carbon isotope.[62] When organic
matter is in the high-over mature stage, thermal alteration of primary
δ13Corg should be minimal as metamorphism
up to lower greenschist facies results in <3‰ 13C-enrichment.[63,64] Furthermore, thermal degradation
resulting from the burial of sedimentary rocks would not be likely
to change the secular pattern of δ13Corg values within a narrow stratigraphic thickness (<100 m).[65] Therefore, δ13Corg values of samples should not be influenced by thermal maturity.
According to the results of the kerogen carbon isotope experiment,
values of the Shanxi Formation samples are all more than −25‰
(Table ), which indicates
that kerogen in the Shanxi Formation is type III. Combined with maceral
compositions and δ13Corg values, the Shanxi
Formation kerogen is type III, which is beneficial to gas generation.
Mineral Compositions
According to
the XRD experiment, mineral compositions of the Shanxi Formation samples
are shown in Table and Figure . The
Shanxi Formation samples are dominated by clay minerals ranging from
51.6 to 89.1% with an average value of 64.1%, followed by quartz which
is in the range of 8%–41.7% (averaging 30.8%), along with a
small amount of siderite varying from 0 to 7.1% (averaging 2.8%).
Feldspar minerals and pyrite can be observed in a few samples, while
carbonate minerals are rarely developed.
Table 3
Mineral Compositions
and Clay Compositions
of the Shanxi Formation Samplesa
mineral compositions (%)
clay compositions (%)
member
sample
quartz
feldspar
siderite
pyrite
clay
illite
I/S
kaolinite
chlorite
Member 2
SX1-4
39.2
1.6
3.0
0.0
56.2
50.52
17.87
21.90
9.71
SX1-5
31.0
0.7
8.6
0.0
59.7
41.31
32.52
23.47
2.70
SX1-6
34.4
1.5
2.4
0.0
61.7
47.83
19.13
27.15
5.89
SX1-7
41.7
2.4
0.6
0.0
55.3
42.14
7.73
42.72
7.41
Member 1
SX1-8
32.5
2.4
0.7
0.0
64.4
15.34
2.98
62.51
19.17
SX1-10
40.6
2.2
1.0
0.0
56.1
56.07
0.00
33.97
9.97
SX1-11
40.4
0.9
0.0
7.1
51.6
26.97
6.15
61.73
5.14
SX1-12
30.3
1.1
7.1
0.0
61.5
28.40
0.00
67.54
4.05
SX1-13
8.0
0.0
3.1
3.2
85.7
4.93
0.00
91.70
3.36
SX1-14
9.8
0.0
1.2
0.0
89.1
8.35
6.18
82.45
3.02
Note: I/S means
illite–smectite
mixed clay.
Figure 3
Mineral composition and
clay composition of the Shanxi Formation
samples.
Mineral composition and
clay composition of the Shanxi Formation
samples.Note: I/S means
illite–smectite
mixed clay.With respect
to clay compositions, kaolinite in the Shanxi Formation
samples has the highest content, ranging from 21.9 to 91.7%, with
an average content of 51.5%, followed by illite, between 4.93 and
56.07%, averaging 32.2%. The content of I/S and chlorite is low, ranging
from 0% to 32.52% and 2.7% to 19.17% (averaging 9.3 and 7%), respectively,
while montmorillonite is hardly developed in the Shanxi Formation
samples.Collectively, the Shanxi Formation samples are dominated
by clay
minerals, along with a low content of brittle minerals (quartz and
feldspar). With the increase of buried depth, brittle minerals gradually
decrease, and clay minerals gradually increase, in which kaolinite
content gradually increases and illite content gradually decreases
(Figure ).
Major and Trace Element Composition
The results of
the major elements experiment are listed in Table . The most abundant major element in the Shanxi Formation
samples is silicon (Si), whose oxide content ranges from 25.319 to
70.608%, with an average of 53.587%, followed by aluminum (Al), with
its oxide content ranging from 14.656 to 52.280%, averaging 34.248%,
and then followed by iron (Fe), kalium (K), sodium (Na), magnesium
(Mg), titanium (Ti), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and manganese (Mn)
in order, with their oxide contents of 0.404–7.892%, 0.232–2.814%,
0.209–1.344%, 0–1.514%, and 0.529–1.529%, respectively.The major elements of rock often
have a good indicating relationship
with its mineral composition. Ross and Bustin[66] indicate that Si, Al, and Ca can reflect the relative contents of
quartz, clay, and carbonate minerals, which is consistent with a high
content of Si quartz and Al clay minerals and a low content of Ca
carbonate minerals.According to types of element compounds,
trace elements in the
crust can be divided into four categories, which are lithophile elements
(Al, K, Na, Mg, Sr, Ba, Rb, etc.), siderophile elements (V, Cr, Mn,
Ti, Co, Ni, Mo, etc.), chalcophile elements (Cu, Zn, Cd, Sb, S, etc.),
and atmophile elements. A total of 27 trace elements have been tested
in experiments, while because of the large amount of data, only data
used in this paper are listed in Table .
Table 5
Trace Elements of the Shanxi Formation
Samples (ppm)
member
sample
V
Cr
Co
Ni
Ba
Mo
Cu
Zn
Sr
Zr
U
Rb
Member 2
SX1-1
108.7
68.9
9.4
24.8
942.8
0.4
609.8
477.6
546.0
145.1
4.5
176.2
SX1-2
117.9
82.9
7.9
32.6
1162.5
0.8
1019.6
837.4
1102.9
158.1
5.6
169.9
SX1-3
110.2
74.5
10.4
30.6
778.5
0.4
877.7
710.1
286.7
130.2
5.4
176.6
SX1-4
115.5
53.8
12.0
39.1
895.9
0.4
719.6
578.5
379.6
169.2
3.9
183.0
SX1-5
90.4
64.2
17.7
39.0
642.5
0.8
2416.3
1692.3
262.6
177.6
3.5
118.4
SX1-6
119.9
37.4
11.3
42.4
714.3
0.6
315.0
280.5
176.1
158.8
4.5
158.1
SX1-7
129.9
63.3
7.6
152.6
687.3
0.3
2159.4
1483.1
283.7
169.7
4.2
164.1
Member 1
SX1-8
120.9
78.9
12.2
43.2
1702.1
1.5
602.1
589.4
1090.2
339.0
5.4
83.9
SX1-9
42.8
33.6
4.5
54.7
265.5
3.5
1015.5
694.0
205.5
323.2
13.4
24.9
SX1-10
113.1
68.2
5.5
26.3
788.5
0.4
1520.2
1067.7
366.9
185.8
3.7
139.7
SX1-11
156.4
116.9
34.3
402.9
694.4
27.7
2408.9
1650.4
496.9
503.5
65.0
99.8
SX1-12
115.4
40.6
7.7
33.1
491.1
1.1
271.7
264.1
210.1
204.7
5.3
87.0
SX1-13
153.0
60.0
11.2
65.1
396.4
3.2
1075.1
787.2
230.6
294.3
9.9
30.6
SX1-14
170.4
113.5
6.8
35.8
494.2
2.6
273.8
269.2
229.2
294.5
7.8
77.5
Different trace elements and element
ratios are usually applied
to discuss paleoproductivity, paleoclimate, and paleoredox conditions,
etc.[67] Ba, Mo, Cu, Zn, and Ni are common
nutrient elements in trace elements, which can be used to represent
paleoproductivity. The contents of Ba, Mo, Cu, Zn, and Ni in the Shanxi
Formation in the study area are 265.51–1702.07 ppm, 0.33–27.70
ppm, 271.70–2416.25 ppm, 264.14–1692.29 ppm, and 24.80–402.86
ppm, respectively. These elements fluctuate greatly in different layers
of the Shanxi Formation, reflecting the erratic paleoproductivity
in the Shanxi Period, which may be affected by frequent regression
and transgression of marine. From the perspective of the Ba element
alone, the paleoproductivity of the Shanxi Formation is lower than
that of the Wufeng–Longmaxi Formation shale[68] and Niutitang Formation shale,[69] which are relatively successful in exploration and development in
South China.The enrichment factors of trace elements calculated
by formula
(1) are shown in Table . The calculation results indicate that the paleoproductivity-sensitive
element Ba of the Shanxi Formation is relatively deficient, BaEF is between 0.22 and 1.38, with an average of 0.70, while
other paleoproductivity indicators Cu, Zn, and Ni are relatively enriched,
of which CuEF is 2.10–62.15 (averaging 15.97), ZnEF is 1.21–25.05 (averaging 6.83), and NiEF is 0.24–945 (averaging 1.13). The paleoredox-sensitive elements
V, Cr, and Co are relatively deficient, with VEF of 0.29–1.35
(averaging 0.48), CrEF of 0.20–1.37 (averaging 0.39),
and CoEF of 0.11–1.92 (averaging 0.36), while MoEF and UEF vary in a wide range with averaging values
of 3.23 and 2.98, respectively.
Table 6
Enrichment Factors
of Trace Elements
in the Shanxi Formation Samples
member
sample
VEF
CrEF
CoEF
NiEF
BaEF
MoEF
CuEF
ZnEF
SrEF
ZrEF
UEF
RbEF
Member 2
SX1-1
0.38
0.33
0.21
0.24
0.76
0.20
6.38
2.94
1.43
0.36
0.76
0.58
SX1-2
0.42
0.40
0.18
0.32
0.95
0.44
10.84
5.24
2.93
0.40
0.95
0.56
SX1-3
0.40
0.37
0.25
0.30
0.65
0.22
9.60
4.57
0.78
0.34
0.94
0.60
SX1-4
0.47
0.30
0.32
0.43
0.84
0.22
8.81
4.17
1.16
0.49
0.77
0.70
SX1-5
0.55
0.54
0.70
0.65
0.91
0.76
44.31
18.26
1.20
0.78
1.03
0.68
SX1-6
0.42
0.18
0.26
0.41
0.58
0.32
3.33
1.74
0.46
0.40
0.77
0.52
SX1-7
0.47
0.31
0.18
1.49
0.57
0.18
23.21
9.38
0.76
0.43
0.71
0.55
Member 1
SX1-8
0.35
0.31
0.23
0.34
1.13
0.66
5.20
2.99
2.35
0.70
0.75
0.23
SX1-9
0.29
0.31
0.20
1.00
0.41
3.51
20.36
8.18
1.03
1.54
4.35
0.16
SX1-10
0.42
0.34
0.13
0.26
0.67
0.22
16.77
6.93
1.01
0.49
0.65
0.48
SX1-11
1.35
1.37
1.92
9.45
1.38
35.73
62.15
25.05
3.21
3.09
27.03
0.80
SX1-12
0.39
0.19
0.17
0.30
0.38
0.55
2.75
1.57
0.53
0.49
0.87
0.27
SX1-13
0.37
0.20
0.18
0.43
0.22
1.16
7.78
3.35
0.42
0.51
1.16
0.07
SX1-14
0.43
0.40
0.11
0.25
0.29
0.99
2.10
1.21
0.44
0.54
0.96
0.19
Discussion
Paleoredox Conditions
The redox condition-sensitive
trace elements have different characteristics in disparate sedimentary
environments, in which some elements are stable in an anoxic environment
and dissolved gradually along with the increase of oxygen content
in the water column.[51,70] Therefore, trace-element enrichment
factors and their relevant ratios can be used as indicators for the
paleoredox conditions of the sedimentary environment.[27,71]Redox-sensitive trace elements (V, Mo, U) are widely used
proxies for paleoredox conditions. V, Mo, and U exist as soluble V5+, Mo6+, and U6+ in the oxic environment,
while these elements are transformed into insoluble V3+, Mo4+, and U4+ under anoxic conditions and
preserved in the sediments.[72,73] Meanwhile, the concentration
of Mo is usually used to classify paleoredox conditions, in which
noneuxinic, intermittently/seasonally euxinic, and permanently euxinic
environments are distinguished by ≤25 ppm and ≥100 ppm.[72] High Mo concentration tends to occur in the
euinxic waters, where H2S is high, whereas U is enriched
in anoxic water without the requirement for free H2S.[74] Therefore, high MoEF/UEF ratios tend to indicate euxinic water column conditions.[75]The concentration of Mo in the Shanxi
Formation samples is lower
than 25 ppm, indicating the oxic environment. The enrichment factors
of V, Mo, and U in Member 2 are relatively lower than those in Member
1 (Figure ), which
have reached a peak around the depth of 3580–3595 m, and the
variation characteristics indicate that the oxygen content of Member
2 paleowater is higher than that of Member 1. Mo concentration and
MoEF/UEF have similar change characteristics,
indicating that the Shanxi Formation deposits under oxic water and
the oxygen content of Member 1 are relatively low (Figure , Table ). Therefore, according to the above analysis,
the study demonstrates that Member 1 deposits in the suboxic environment
with a low oxygen content and Member 2 deposits in the oxic environment
with a high oxygen content.
Figure 4
Proxies for paleoredox conditions of the Shanxi
Formation in the
southeastern Ordos Basin.
Table 7
Trace-Element Ratios of the Shanxi
Formation Samples from the SX-1 Well in the Study Area
member
sample
MoEF/UEF
Mo/Al (ppm/%)
U/Al (ppm/%)
Ti/Al
Zr/Al (ppm/%)
Rb/K
Sr/Cu
C-value
CIA
Member 2
SX1-1
0.264
0.020
0.234
0.018
7.58
75.46
0.90
0.14
86.90
SX1-2
0.465
0.044
0.295
0.017
8.39
84.67
1.08
0.11
88.41
SX1-3
0.235
0.022
0.292
0.019
7.11
76.32
0.33
0.21
86.56
SX1-4
0.281
0.022
0.239
0.021
10.35
83.80
0.53
0.18
85.72
SX1-5
0.734
0.076
0.319
0.036
16.27
44.74
0.11
0.24
77.60
SX1-6
0.414
0.032
0.237
0.019
8.37
75.64
0.56
0.24
87.98
SX1-7
0.251
0.018
0.218
0.020
9.12
99.56
0.13
0.36
89.91
Member 1
SX1-8
0.880
0.066
0.231
0.017
14.62
89.27
1.81
0.09
94.12
SX1-9
0.807
0.350
1.346
0.102
32.36
119.87
0.20
0.29
95.16
SX1-10
0.338
0.022
0.202
0.020
10.24
102.63
0.24
0.18
90.29
SX1-11
1.322
3.569
8.371
0.059
64.89
116.42
0.21
0.60
87.93
SX1-12
0.638
0.055
0.268
0.017
10.34
76.74
0.77
0.28
92.04
SX1-13
1.002
0.116
0.360
0.020
10.63
159.00
0.21
0.46
97.28
SX1-14
1.033
0.099
0.297
0.022
11.27
92.37
0.84
0.45
95.25
Proxies for paleoredox conditions of the Shanxi
Formation in the
southeastern Ordos Basin.
Paleoproductivity
Conditions
The
paleoproductivity influences the material basis of OM, which is one
of the important factors of shale gas accumulation. TOC is the intuitive
indicator of paleoproductivity in sediments, which mainly comes from
the sinking OM in the surface ocean.[51,76,77] The concentrations of nutrient elements (e.g., Cu,
Zn, and Ni) in the water column significantly control the marine primary
productivity, which can be preserved in sediments along with OM and
used as proxies for paleoproductivity.[77] Meanwhile, the productivity of phytoplankton and bacteria is correlated
with Mo and U contents, which can be applied as indicators (Mo/Al
and U/Al) for paleoproductivity.[67,78,79]In Figure , TOC, Mo/Al, U/Al, CuEF, ZnEF, and NiEF have the similar longitudinal variation characteristic
that the values slightly decrease from Member 1 to Member 2 and reach
a peak in the depth of 3580–3595 m, representing the little
change of paleoproductivity in the Shanxi Formation samples, which
indicates that the accumulation is not controlled by the paleoproductivity
in the Shanxi Formation.
Figure 5
Paleoproductivity and terrestrial influx intensity
of the Shanxi
Formation in the southeastern Ordos Basin.
Paleoproductivity and terrestrial influx intensity
of the Shanxi
Formation in the southeastern Ordos Basin.
Terrestrial Influx Intensity
The
terrestrial influx has carried out many nutrients into sedimentary
water in geological history, which influences the accumulation of
OM through the intensity change.[80] The
distribution of elements in different types of source rocks is different,
in which mafic igneous rock contains more nutrient element P compared
with felsic igneous rock, which influences the accumulation of OM.
The distribution of TiO2 and Zr is commonly used as proxies
to distinguish the source rock types.[81] The data of TiO2-Zr in the Shanxi Formation sediments
from the SX-1, CY1, and CY2 well (data of CY1 and CY2 well is from
Zhao, Li, Wang, Wu, Wang, Qin, Cheng, and Li[43]) indicate that the source rock type of the Shanxi Formation is mainly
felsic igneous rock (Figure ), which rarely influence the difference of OM accumulation.
Figure 6
Types
of source rocks in the Shanxi Formation (modified with permission
from Hayashi, Fujisawa, Holland, and Ohmoto[81]).
Types
of source rocks in the Shanxi Formation (modified with permission
from Hayashi, Fujisawa, Holland, and Ohmoto[81]).Elements Ti, Zr, and Al are relatively
stable and rarely influenced
by the weathering effect and diagenetic processes, resulting in that
these elements are good indicators for the terrestrial influx intensity.[28,51,66,82] Al is mainly derived from aluminosilicate in clay minerals, whereas
Ti and Zr are effectively preserved in clay minerals and heavy minerals
such as quartz, zircon, and pyroxene.[83] Therefore, ratios of Ti/Al and Zr/Al are chosen as good indicators
for the terrestrial influx intensity. As shown in Figure , Al concentration and Ti/Al
and Zr/Al ratios have the same change characteristic, and the values
gradually decrease from Member 1 to Member 2, which indicates that
the terrestrial influx intensity of the Shanxi Formation weakens tardily
during the geological history. This kind of change may be caused by
the frequent transgression and regression, and the change identifies
with the change of TOC in the Shanxi Formation (Figure ). Therefore, the relatively strong terrestrial
influx carries more nutrient substances into the water column, which
results in the higher oxygen consumption and suboxic environment in
Member 1, while Member 2 belongs to the oxic environment because of
the relatively weak terrestrial influx and lower oxygen consumption.
Paleowater Depth
The depth of the
water column can influence the accumulation of OM, in which deep water
with weak hydrodynamic force is conducive to the accumulation and
shallow water has the opposite effect. Rb and K are commonly used
as the proxy for paleowater depth because of the adsorption difference
on the surface of clay minerals.[84,85] Compared with
K, Rb has stronger adsorption ability on clay minerals. Therefore,
with the migration of clay minerals in water, the concentration of
Rb increases, resulting in the positive relationship between paleowater
depth and the Rb/K ratio.[86,87]The Rb/K ratio
of the Shanxi Formation sediments from the SX-1 well ranges from 44.74
to 159.00 (Table ),
in which the ratio gradually decreases from Member 1 to Member 2 (Figure ). Rb/K ratios of
Member 1 and Member 2 in the CY2 well are in the range of 67.72–79.18
and 55.66–64.56, respectively, suggesting the analogous variation
trend that the ratio decreases from lower to upper of the Shanxi Formation.[43] Lithologic assemblage can also reflect the change
of paleowater depth, in which sandstone and carbonate are deposited
in shallow water environment and mudstone is deposited in deep water
environment. As shown in Figure , the sandy content increases from Member 1 to Member
2, which indicates that the paleowater depth decreases from Member
to Member 2. Based on the analyses of the Rb/K ratio and lithologic
assemblage, the paleowater depth of the Shanxi Formation has been
shoaled from Member 1 to Member 2, resulting in the increase of hydrodynamic
force, which is unfavorable for the accumulation of OM. Meanwhile,
Member 1 with a deeper paleowater depth is close to the provenance,
which is more convenient for the migration of terrestrial nutrient
to sedimentary water than Member 2, leading to the relatively strong
terrestrial influx in Member 1 of the Shanxi Formation.
Figure 7
Paleowater
depth and paleoclimate of the Shanxi Formation southeastern
Ordos Basin.
Paleowater
depth and paleoclimate of the Shanxi Formation southeastern
Ordos Basin.
Paleoclimate
Changes
Changes in temperature
and humidity influence the stratification of water and the preservation
of sediments, thereby affecting the enrichment and preservation of
OM in sediments. Therefore, the paleoclimate analysis of reservoirs
is helpful to explain the distribution and variation characteristics
of OM.Clay minerals are particularly sensitive to changes in
the geological environment because of the crystal structure and small
particle size, in which kaolinite develops in the acidulous, warm
and humid environment due to the loss of alkali metal in relatively
strong leaching of weathering, and illite develops in the alkalescent,
cold and dry environment resulting from the relatively weak leaching
in weathering.[88−92] From Member 1 to Member 2, the decrease of kaolinite content and
the increase of illite indicate that the paleoenvironment of the Shanxi
Formation sediments changes from warm and humid climatic conditions
to relatively cold and dry climatic conditions (Figure ).In addition to clay minerals, the
concentration of climate-sensitive
trace elements Sr and Cu can also be used as a proxy for paleoclimate
changes.[28,93] Cu is more stable than Sr in the leaching
effect of weathering, resulting in a high Sr/Cu ratio in the cold-dry
climate with strong weathering and a low Sr/Cu ratio in the warm-humid
climate with weak weathering.[94,95] Previous studies have
indicated that Sr/Cu is lower than 10 referring to the warm and humid
climate, while Sr/Cu is higher than 10 representing cold and dry climate.[30,95,96] The ratio of the Shanxi Formation
sediments in the SX-1 well ranges from 0.11 to 1.81 with an average
value of 0.57, which indicates that the sedimentary environment of
the Shanxi Formation is a warm and humid climate (Table and Figure ). The ratio of the Shanxi Formation samples
in the CY2 well is between 1.48 and 7.43 with an average value of
3.97, which also reflects the warm and humid paleoclimate in the Shanxi
period.[43]Previous studies have indicated
that the C-value
increases from 0 to 1, reflecting the climate changes from cold-dry
to warm-humid.[97] According to formula (2),
the value of the Shanxi Formation sediments in the study area varies
from 0.09 to 0.60 (averaging 0.27) (Table ). Noteworthily, the C-value
of Member 2 is between 0.11 and 0.36 (averaging 0.21), while the C-value of Member 1 ranges from 0.09 to 0.60 (averaging
0.34), which reveals the paleoclimate of Member 2 is colder and drier
than that of Member 1 consistent with the variation of the C-value in Figure .The high CIA value represents the strong weathering
intensity in
a warm and humid climate, while the low CIA indicates the cold and
dry climate.[98] From Figure , it can be figured out that the CIA value
decreases from the low to upper of the Shanxi Formation, resulting
from the gradual decrease of temperature and humidity in the Shanxi
period.Comprehensively, considering the above analyses of clay
mineral
composition, Sr/Cu, C-value, and CIA, this study
suggests that Member 1 is in a relatively warm and humid climate conducive
to the formation of OM, while the climate of Member 2 gradually transits
to a relatively cold and dry climate with relatively poor OM formation
conditions, which is consistent with the longitudinal variation characteristic
of TOC in the Shanxi Formation (Figure ).
Accumulation Mechanisms
of OM in the Shanxi
Formation Shale
The accumulation of OM is a complicated geological
process, which is greatly influenced by the paleoenvironment (paleoredox,
paleoproductivity, terrestrial influx, and paleoclimate), and is mainly
divided into productivity mode and preservation mode.[99−102]According to the above discussions, the paleoclimate indexes
indicate that the relatively warm-humid climate of Member 1 is conducive
to the OM accumulation while Member 2 with a relatively cold-dry climate
has low TOC (Figure ).The paleoredox change mainly influences the OM preservation
condition,
therefore controlling the OM accumulation. As shown in Figure a,b, the indexes (VEF, MoEF, and UEF) have positive relationships
between TOC of Member 2 while there is no relationship in Member 1.
Therefore, the contribution of the paleoredox condition is different
in the two members, in which TOC increases with the decrease of oxygen
content in Member 2 and the paleoredox condition has an unobvious
contribution to the OM accumulation of Member 1.
Figure 8
Relationships between
paleoenvironment indexes and TOC, while panels
(a), (c), (e), and (g) are data of Member 2, and panels (b), (d),
(f), and (h) are data of Member 1. (a, b) Paleoredox indexes vs TOC;
(c–f) paleoproductivity indexes vs TOC; (g, h) terrestrial
influx intensity vs TOC.
Relationships between
paleoenvironment indexes and TOC, while panels
(a), (c), (e), and (g) are data of Member 2, and panels (b), (d),
(f), and (h) are data of Member 1. (a, b) Paleoredox indexes vs TOC;
(c–f) paleoproductivity indexes vs TOC; (g, h) terrestrial
influx intensity vs TOC.Additionally, relationships
between paleoproductivity and TOC demonstrate
the different contributions of paleoproductivity in Member 2 and Member
1 (Figure c–f).
In Member 2, the paleoproductivity indexes (CuEF, ZnEF, NiEF, U/Al, and Mo/Al) are positively correlated
with TOC in different degrees, which is conducive to the OM accumulation.
However, there is no linear relationship between paleoproductivity
indexes and TOC in Member 1, which indicates that the paleoproductivity
has no contribution to the OM accumulation.As shown in Figure g,h, the terrestrial
influx intensity is positively correlated with
TOC in Member 2 and Member 1, therefore, the terrestrial influx is
the main controlling factor of the OM accumulation in the Shanxi Formation,
which may have resulted from the provenance uplift, frequent transgression,
and regression.[15,45]The above analysis show
that the paleoenvironment characteristics
are quite different in Member 2 and Member 1 due to the evolution
of the transitional facies, which results in the differences of the
OM accumulation in the Shanxi Formation. In the sedimentary stage
of Member 1, the relatively warm and humid climate is beneficial to
the growth of higher plants and other organisms, which can produce
a large amount of OM. Meanwhile, the water depth is relatively deep,
which indicates that the paleowater is close to the terrestrial provenance,
resulting in the relatively strong terrestrial OM input. The strong
terrestrial influx leads to a high depositional rate, which can dilute
the autogenetic paleoproductivity in the paleowater, therefore the
paleoproductivity has no contribution to the OM in Member 1. Moreover,
the suboxic water has no influence on the OM accumulation, which results
from the strong terrestrial influx. Summarily, the OM accumulation
of Member 1 is mainly controlled by the terrestrial influx intensity
and paleowater depth, where the strong terrestrial influx weakens
the influence of other paleoenvironment factors (Figure a).
Figure 9
Accumulation models of
the OM in (a) Member 1 and (b) Member 2
of the Shanxi Formation.
Accumulation models of
the OM in (a) Member 1 and (b) Member 2
of the Shanxi Formation.In the sedimentary stage
of Member 2, the relatively cold and dry
climate is not favorable for the growth of higher plants. Along with
the regression from the southeastern Ordos Basin,[45,47] the paleowater depth is lower than that of Member 1, and the sand
content of the upper Member 2 gradually increases. Meanwhile, because
of the low water depth, the sedimentary water is far away from the
terrestrial provenance, resulting in a relatively weak terrestrial
influx with less OM. The positive relationships between paleoproductivity,
paleoredox conditions, and TOC indicate that the oxygen content and
the paleoproductivity jointly enhance the OM accumulation. In general,
the OM accumulation of Member 2 is comprehensively controlled by the
paleowater depth, terrestrial influx, paleoproductivity, and paleoredox
conditions, however, the weak terrestrial influx, low paleoproductivity,
and oxic water conjointly result in the low TOC (Figure b).
Conclusions
The Shanxi Formation shale is deposited in the marine–continental
transitional facies with frequent transgression and regression, in
which the southeastern Ordos Basin mainly develops the delta front
and shallow lake facies. The OM is characterized by the high mature
stage and type III kerogen, indicating a high potential for shale
gas generation. However, the TOC shows an interlayer difference, in
which the TOC of Member 1 ranging from 0.75 to 7.49% (averaging 3.82)
is higher than that of Member 2 (0.33–2.19%, averaging 0.89%).The paleoenvironment of the Shanxi Formation has great differences
along with the gradual withdraw of seawater from the southeastern
Ordos Basin. From Member 1 to Member 2, the paleoclimate changes from
relatively warm and humid to relatively cold and dry, which is gradually
inconducive to the growth of higher plants and other organisms. The
paleowater depth of Member 2 is shallower than that of Member 1, resulting
in that the water of Member 2 is farther from the provenance than
that of Member 1, therefore reducing the terrestrial influx intensity.
Moreover, from Member 1 to Member 2, the paleoproductivity has gradually
decreased and reached a peak in Member 1, while the oxygen content
has gradually increased and the paleowater column changes from suboxic
to oxic environments.Considering the differences of the paleoenvironment
in the Shanxi
Formation, the accumulation mechanisms of OM have been studied. The
OM accumulation of Member 1 with higher TOC is mainly controlled by
the terrestrial influx intensity and paleowater depth, where the strong
terrestrial influx weakens the influence of other paleoenvironment
factors. The OM accumulation of Member 2 is comprehensively controlled
by the paleowater depth, terrestrial influx, paleoproductivity, and
paleoredox conditions, however, the weak terrestrial influx, low paleoproductivity,
and oxic water conjointly result in the low OM abundance. The paleoenvironment
characteristic and its influence on the OM accumulation of the transitional
Shanxi Formation shale have been studied in this paper, which can
improve the understanding of the OM accumulation in other transitional
shales and provide a theoretical basis for the reservoir selection
of the Shanxi Formation shale gas exploration and development in the
southeastern Ordos Basin.