Xiaofen Huang1,2,3, Qin Zhang4,2,3, Wei Wang5, Jingda Pan5, Yan Yang5. 1. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China. 2. National & Local Joint Laboratory of Engineering for Effective Utilization of Regional Mineral Resources from Karst Areas, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China. 3. Guizhou Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Non-metallic Mineral Resources, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China. 4. Guizhou Academy of Science, Guiyang 550001, Guizhou, China. 5. College of Mining, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Abstract
Red mud (RM) is a hazardous solid waste discharged from the alumina production process. The stock of RM is very large, and it has strong alkalinity and certain radioactivity, which makes it have a very serious adverse effect on the environment. Many scholars have carried out extensive experimental investigations on the minimization, hazard-free treatment, and reutilization of RM, and encouraging results have been obtained. However, reutilization of RM has been restricted mainly due to its complex composition and strong alkalinity. In this study, carbide slag, a byproduct of acetylene production, was utilized to remove alkalis (Na+ and K+) from RM by calcium ion replacement. The effects of the temperature, liquid-to-solid ratio, carbide slag dose, and leaching time on dealkalization of RM by carbide slag were studied. The leaching mechanism of sodium was investigated and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectrometry. Under the optimal conditions, the residual Na2O and K2O amount in the RM after dealkalization using the carbide slag diminished to less than 0.93 and 0.45 wt %. More than 78.80% of Na2O and 58.84% of K2O could be dissolved under the optimal conditions. The cancrinite structure in the initial RM was destroyed, and soluble sodium salts formed in the suspension can be easily replaced by carbide slag reducing Na+. The dealkalization process of RM by using carbide slag was controlled by chemical reaction of shrinking core model, where the apparent activation energy was 4.92 kJ/mol.
Red mud (RM) is a hazardous solid waste discharged from the alumina production process. The stock of RM is very large, and it has strong alkalinity and certain radioactivity, which makes it have a very serious adverse effect on the environment. Many scholars have carried out extensive experimental investigations on the minimization, hazard-free treatment, and reutilization of RM, and encouraging results have been obtained. However, reutilization of RM has been restricted mainly due to its complex composition and strong alkalinity. In this study, carbide slag, a byproduct of acetylene production, was utilized to remove alkalis (Na+ and K+) from RM by calcium ion replacement. The effects of the temperature, liquid-to-solid ratio, carbide slag dose, and leaching time on dealkalization of RM by carbide slag were studied. The leaching mechanism of sodium was investigated and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectrometry. Under the optimal conditions, the residual Na2O and K2O amount in the RM after dealkalization using the carbide slag diminished to less than 0.93 and 0.45 wt %. More than 78.80% of Na2O and 58.84% of K2O could be dissolved under the optimal conditions. The cancrinite structure in the initial RM was destroyed, and soluble sodium salts formed in the suspension can be easily replaced by carbide slag reducing Na+. The dealkalization process of RM by using carbide slag was controlled by chemical reaction of shrinking core model, where the apparent activation energy was 4.92 kJ/mol.
Red mud (RM, bauxite residue), a byproduct of the alumina refining
industry, is a type of solid waste with high alkalinity and a high
heavy metal content.[1−4] For 1 t of alumina produced, approximately 1.5 t of RM is discharged.[5] In 2018, global storage of the RM reached 4.6
billion tons,[6,7] and damming disposal is still
the main way to dispose of RM in the world.[8,9] RM
exerts a substantial impact on environments by contaminating water
and soil due to leakage of alkaline compounds, polluting the air with
RM dust, and altering land occupation.[10−13] Many scholars have carried out
extensive experimental investigations to find practical use for RM.
For instance, RM has been suggested as a raw material for roadbed,[14,15] building,[16−18] adsorption material for environmental management
such as wastewater treatment,[19,20] waste gas treatment,[21,22] and soil remediation,[23,24] and recovery of valuable
metals, such as Fe, Al, Ti, Sc, and Y.[5,25−27] However, the strong alkalinity of RM restrains its application as
the raw material of waste water treatment adsorbents, fillers, and
building materials. The waste water treatment adsorbents prepared
from RM without dealkalization may cause secondary pollution because
of the dissolution of alkali. Sodium would migrate to the material
surface, resulting in the low strength and “frost” phenomenon
of building materials.[28] High acid consumption
and cost are also required during the leaching process of valuable
metals such as titanium,[29,30] yttrium,[31] and scandium.[32]Meanwhile, the presence of sodium in significant quantities at
alkaline pH is a significant inhibitor to the creation of the aggregate
structure and hydraulic conductivities conducive to plant growth.[2,33] In addition, the presence of large concentrations of Na+ elevates the electrical conductivity of the solution beyond tolerable
limits for plants and denies plants the uptake of water.[34] Dealkalization is a major limiting factor for
the comprehensive utilization of RM. Therefore, the dealkalization
process of RM is an important precondition for the next comprehensive
utilization.The pH of RM ranges over 10∼13 with an average
value of
11.3 ± 1.0, which mainly depends on the production process.[35,36] At present, the main method for dealkalization of RM includes direct
water leaching,[37,38] acid neutralization,[39,40] calcium ion replacement,[41−43] and wet carbonization.[44−46] Water leaching does not consume reagents, and it is inexpensive.
However, the process is time-consuming, as repeated dealkalization
and long-term leaching are required, and only free alkali can be removed
from RM. Thus, the comprehensive use of RM subsequent to water leaching
is limited. The wet carbonization method can effectively remove both
free alkali and structural alkali from RM without consuming reagents.
However, wet carbonization requires high pressure, strict leaching
equipment requirements, and operate conditions. Acid leaching can
be considered an effective dealkalization method. A large amount of
Na can be leached from RM using acid leaching, but many other metallic
oxides, such as iron, aluminum, and various rare metal oxides, are
also dissolved by this process. Furthermore, the resulting leaching
residue is difficult to apply in roadbed, building, and environmental
adsorption materials due to its strong acidity. The calcium ion replacement
method removes both free alkali and structural alkali from RM. Calcium
ions can react with alkaline substances in RM to form tricalcium aluminate
and displace sodium to reduce alkalinity, which is conducive to the
reconstruction of vegetation by improving the stability of RM microaggregates
and increasing RM permeability.[47,48] Han et al.[49] demonstrated that the introduction of Ca2+ accelerated a pH decrease in bauxite residues while also
precipitating carbonate to form calcium carbonate. Zhu[43] demonstrated that selective leaching of Na from
RM was achieved using water leaching with CaO at high temperature
and pressure. Cancrinite was decomposed from the RM during the selective
leaching process. Liu et al.[41] treated
fine RM with soda-lime roasting under reductive atmosphere prior to
leaching and magnetic separation. They found that the recovery of
Al and Na after the water leaching was about 75.7 and 80.7%, respectively.
However, the calcium ion replacement method consumes large quantities
of reagents and is therefore, expensive.The RM dealkalization
process should be economically and technologically
feasible in order to achieve industrial application. Alkaline regulation
by industrial waste application, achieved using the “using
waste to treat waste” principle, makes RM environmental development
a future possibility. It was well known that carbide slag is the byproduct
of the production of acetylene using calcium carbide and its main
ingredients were Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3.[50,51] As the main component of carbide slag is Ca(OH)2, it
is possible that carbide slag can be used in RM dealkalization. In
this work, carbide slag was utilized to remove alkalis (Na+ and K+) in RM. The main factors studied were temperature,
liquid-to-solid ratio (L/S), carbide slag dose, and leaching time.
The leaching mechanism of sodium was investigated and analyzed using
inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES),
X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive
spectrometry (SEM–EDS).
Experimental Section
Materials
The RM samples studied
in this research were collected from a Bayer Process alumina plant
in Guizhou Province, China. The samples were dried at 65 °C for
24 h and passed through a 60-mesh sieve prior to chemical analysis.
The chemical composition of RM analyzed by X-ray fluorescence is shown
in Table . The XRD
pattern of the RM sample is shown in Figure .
Table 1
Components of RM
in This Study
component
Na2O
Al2O3
SiO2
Fe2O3
CaO
TiO2
MgO
K2O
LOI 1000
content
(wt %)
4.66
21.38
16.37
20.49
14.30
4.52
1.58
0.99
12.69
Figure 1
XRD pattern of the RM (a) and carbide slag (b)
sample.
XRD pattern of the RM (a) and carbide slag (b)
sample.It can be seen that the main mineral
phases of the original RM
were cancrinite, katoite, xonotlite, calcite, and hematite. The main
minerals that caused RM to be alkaline are katoite, cancrinite, and
calcite. Sodium mainly existed in cancrinite, and it was difficult
to be removed using water leaching. The particle size distribution
of RM is indicated in Figure . The size of all particles was less than 69.61 μm,
while the average particle size is 9.90 μm. Therefore, leaching
could be directly carried out without grinding.
Figure 2
Particle size distribution
of RM.
Particle size distribution
of RM.
Methods
First, the samples of RM
were dried in a DHG-9035A oven (China) at 65 °C for 12 h. Then,
10 g of the dried sample was added to some carbide slag and DI water.
Three replicates of each treatment were completed in order to effectively
reduce the error. The weighed RM sample (10 g) was mixed with carbide
slag and 40 mL of deionized water in 250 mL bottles and sealed with
a plastic membrane to prevent external interference. The ore slurry
was vibrated at the speed of 160 rpm under different conditions of
L/S, leaching temperature, carbide slag dosage, and leaching time
by using a SHZ-88 constant temperature water bath oscillator (China).
The L/S was set as 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (mL/g). Leaching temperature
was controlled at 25, 50, 70, and 90 °C. Leaching time was set
as 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h. Carbide slag dosage was set as 5, 10,
15, 20, 25, 30, 40, and 50 wt %. The leaching solution was collected
through filtration with a SHZ-D(III) vacuum suction filter (China).
Then, the contents of sodium and other compositions in leaching solution
were determined by ICP–AES. The leaching residue was dried
at 80 °C. Then, the composition of the leaching residue was also
analyzed by ICP–AES after the residue was completely decomposed
in an acid solution of hydrofluoric acid, perchloric acid, and nitric
acid. The dealkalization rate was calculated using eq where η is the dealkalization
rate (%), N is the quantity of sodium oxide in leaching
solution (g), M is the quantity of sodium oxide in
the RM (g), m is the weight of the leaching residue
(g), q is the grade of sodium oxide in the RM sample
(%), V is the quantity of the leaching solution (mL),
and p is the content of sodium oxide in the leaching
solution (mg/L).
Detection and Analysis
The Na2O and K2O contents of the RM and leaching
residue
were determined by ICP–AES (ICAP 7400, ThermoFisher, USA).
The raw RM sample was characterized by an X-ray fluorescence analyzer
(Magix PW2424, Panako, the Netherlands), X-ray powder diffraction
(X Pert Powder, Panako, the Netherlands), and the particle size analyzer
(LS13320, Beckman Coulter, USA). XRD was conducted with a 2θ
scan range from 10° to 70° at a step size of 1°/s.
Patterns were indexed using Jade 6. The surface morphology and elemental
distribution of the treated samples were analyzed by SEM–EDS
(Merlin Compact, ZEISS, Germany). The thermolysis behaviors of RM
samples were investigated using thermogravimetric analysis and differential
scanning calorimetry (TG–DSC, 1100LF, Mettler, Switzerland).
Results and Discussions
Effects
of Temperature and L/S on Dealkalization
The effect of leaching
temperature and L/S on the dealkalization
efficiency was investigated using 5 wt % carbide slag for 2 h. The
result is shown in Figure , revealing that the dealkalization efficiency increased with
increasing leaching temperature. The content of Na2O and
K2O in the residue decreased as the temperature was increased
from 25 to 90 °C. The dealkalization efficiency of both Na2O and K2O changed as the L/S increased from 3 to
7 mL/g, but not very much. Consequently, the residual alkali content
in the RM is still large. Considering water consumption and solid–liquid
separation, the L/S was 3 mL/g and temperature was 90 °C.
Figure 3
Effects of
temperature and liquid-to solid ratio on dealkalization
(a) Residue Na2O; (b) residue K2O.
Effects of
temperature and liquid-to solid ratio on dealkalization
(a) Residue Na2O; (b) residue K2O.
Effects of Carbide Slag Dosage and Leaching
Time on Dealkalization
The effects of carbide slag dosage
and leaching time on dealkalization of RM are presented in Figure under the condition
of leaching temperature of 90 °C and L/S of 3 mL/g. It is shown
from Figure that
the effect of carbide slag dosage and leaching time on dealkalization
rate was apparent. The residual K2O changes were not obvious
with increasing leaching time. As the carbide slag dosage increased
from 5 to 50 wt % for 12 h, the residual K2O decreased
from 0.88 to 0.40 wt %. The residual Na2O decreased gradually
with increasing carbide slag dosage and leaching time. The decrease
of residual Na2O was mild at low reaction time, and it
became obvious at long reaction time. The residual Na2O
decreased from 3.90 to 1.19 wt % with the increasing carbide slag
dosage from 5 to 50 wt % for 2 h. It decreased from 3.83 to 0.49 wt
% for 12 h at the same leach conditions. The residual Na2O was 2.18, 1.96, 1.84, 0.93, 0.50, and 0.49 wt % with 30 wt % carbide
slag dosage for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h. Therefore, the suitable
leaching time and carbide slag dosage were 8 h and 30 wt %, respectively.
The residual Na2O in RM can be reduced to less than 1 wt
% under this condition, while the dealkalization efficiencies of Na2O and K2O are 78.80 and 58.84%, respectively.
Figure 4
Effects
of dosage of carbide slag and reaction time on dealkalization.
(a) Residue Na2O; (b) residue K2O.
Effects
of dosage of carbide slag and reaction time on dealkalization.
(a) Residue Na2O; (b) residue K2O.
Mechanism Analysis on Dealkalization of RM
The mineral composition of the leaching residue was analyzed using
XRD, revealing that the minerals in the leaching residue were changed
after leaching with carbide slag, as shown in Figure . During dealkalization, calcite and hematite
did not change significantly after introduction of carbide slag. In
the XRD of initial RM, cancrinite is identified by the peaks at 14.0°,
19.1°, 24.4°, and 27.7°. Besides, peaks at 17.6°
and 32.4° are observed for katoite. After dealkalization by carbide
slag, the peaks at 14.0°, 19.1°, 24.4°, and 27.7°
were weakened, indicating that the structure of cancrinite (Na6Ca2Al6Si6O24(CO3)2·2H2O) has been destroyed. By
replacing sodium with calcium, cancrinite changed to other forms such
as katoite(Ca3Al2SiO4(OH)8) and Na in the form of ions is released into the solution from the
RM.
Figure 5
Structure changes of RM before (A) and after dealkalization by
using 15 wt % carbide slag (B) and 30 wt % carbide slag (C):1-Calcite,
2-Xonotlite, 3-Katoite, 4-Cancrinite, 5-Tricalcium Aluminate, 6-Hematite,
7-Calcium silicate, 8-Prehnite, and 9-Calcium Oxide.
Structure changes of RM before (A) and after dealkalization by
using 15 wt % carbide slag (B) and 30 wt % carbide slag (C):1-Calcite,
2-Xonotlite, 3-Katoite, 4-Cancrinite, 5-Tricalcium Aluminate, 6-Hematite,
7-Calcium silicate, 8-Prehnite, and 9-Calcium Oxide.The morphology and elemental distribution of the leaching
residue
obtained when using different carbide slag doses were analyzed using
SEM–EDS, and the results are shown in Figures and 7. Figure shows that the particles of
RM were irregular. However, the particles became bigger and looser
as the carbide slag dose was increased. The particle of RM was aggregated.
It can be inferred that carbide slag can promote the agglomeration
of RM particles, which is conducive to the subsequent soil remediation
and secondary resource utilization of building materials.
Figure 6
SEM photographs
of initial RM (a–c), RM dealkalied by 15
wt % carbide slag (d–f), and RM dealkalied by 30 wt % carbide
slag (g–i).
Figure 7
SEM–EDS image
of RM before (a) and after dealkalization
by 15% carbide slag (b) and after dealkalization by 30% carbide slag
(c).
SEM photographs
of initial RM (a–c), RM dealkalied by 15
wt % carbide slag (d–f), and RM dealkalied by 30 wt % carbide
slag (g–i).SEM–EDS image
of RM before (a) and after dealkalization
by 15% carbide slag (b) and after dealkalization by 30% carbide slag
(c).Mapping images revealed that following
carbide slag additions,
Ca on the surface of RM increased, with an associated decrease in
Na and K (Figure ).
According to EDS analysis, the relative mass fractions of Ca, Mg,
K, and Na on the surface initial RM accounted for 3.72, 0.56, 0.82,
and 4.70%, respectively. Addition of carbide slag significantly enhanced
Ca, while reducing Na and K. Alkaline substances of RM are mainly
divided into insoluble alkali and soluble chemical alkali. The soluble
alkali is mainly composed of NaOH, Na2CO3, NaHCO3, NaAl(OH)4, Na2SiO3, KOH,
K2CO3, and so forth,[2,7] and
Na+ and K+ can be removed by water leaching.
The insoluble alkalis are mainly composed of cancrinite, calcite,
and tricalcium aluminate (TCA) in which Na+ and K+ are hard to remove.[36] Continuous provision
of Ca2+ by carbide slag in solution precipitates with alkaline
anions and additionally exchanges sodium and potassium with insoluble
alkali. Considering the XRD analysis results, the decomposition reaction
of cancrinite appeared to have taken place. By replacing sodium with
calcium, cancrinite changed to other forms such as katoite, and Na
is released into the solution from the RM. The TG–DSC curves
of the initial and treated RM are depicted in Figure . As Figure shows, the initial RM and treated RM had a similar
changing trend in the thermogravimetry process.
Figure 8
TG–DSC curve of
RM before (a) and after dealkalization by
15% carbide slag (b) and after dealkalization by 30% carbide slag
(c).
TG–DSC curve of
RM before (a) and after dealkalization by
15% carbide slag (b) and after dealkalization by 30% carbide slag
(c).
Leaching
Kinetics of Dealkalization
It is important to establish a
quantitative measurement of the leaching
kinetic to confirm the dealkalization process. The dealkalization
process of RM by using carbide slag is a solid–liquid multiphase
reaction, and the leaching reaction occurs at the interface of two
phases. Therefore, the dealkalization process could be analyzed by
the shrinking core model (SCM). According to the SCM, assuming that
the leaching process is controlled by the chemical reaction, the following
expression can be applied for the leaching kineticwhere η is the dealkalization
rate (%), t is reaction time (min), and Kb is the rate constant of chemical reaction. Figure was plotted according
to eq .
Figure 9
Plots of 1 – (1
– η)1/3 vs time
at different temperatures.
Plots of 1 – (1
– η)1/3 vs time
at different temperatures.According to Figure the control of chemical reaction fitted the leaching data well at
different temperatures. The slopes of each straight line in Figure represent the reaction
rate constants at different temperatures, as per the Arrhenius equation.where Kb is the reaction rate constant (min–1), k0 is the pre-exponential factor, E is the apparent activation energy (kJ·mol–1), R is the molar gas constant (kJ·mol–1·K–1), and T is the thermodynamic temperature (K). The Arrhenius curve is plotted
in Figure , with
1/T and lnKb as the horizontal
and vertical ordinates, respectively; the apparent activation energy E was calculated as 4.92 kJ·mol–1.
Figure 10
Plot of lnKb vs temperature of leaching.
Plot of lnKb vs temperature of leaching.
Conclusions
The
results obtained in the present work showed that the alkalis
could be obviously removed using water leaching with carbide slag.
The carbide slag dose, temperature, and leaching time were found to
be a key factor determining the dealkalization efficiency according
to the results of the dealkalization experiments. When the carbide
slag dosage was 30 wt %, the leaching time was 8 h, temperature was
90 °C, and L/S was 3 mL/g, and the results showed that dealkalization
efficiencies of Na2O and K2O were 78.80 and
58.84%, respectively, and the residual Na2O and K2O were 0.93 and 0.45 wt %, respectively. The mineral cancrinite (Na6Ca2Al6Si6O24(CO3)2·2H2O) was decomposed in the
leaching process. By replacing sodium with calcium, cancrinite changed
to other forms such as katoite (Ca3Al2SiO4(OH)8), and Na in the form of ions is released
into the solution from the RM. The dealkalization process of RM by
using carbide slag was controlled by chemical reaction of SCM, where
the apparent activation energy was 4.92 kJ/mol.
Authors: Alizée P Lehoux; Cindy L Lockwood; William M Mayes; Douglas I Stewart; Robert J G Mortimer; Katalin Gruiz; Ian T Burke Journal: Environ Geochem Health Date: 2013-06-23 Impact factor: 4.609
Authors: Shengguo Xue; Xiangfeng Kong; Feng Zhu; William Hartley; Xiaofei Li; Yiwei Li Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 4.223