| Literature DB >> 35155541 |
Yuehui Jia1, Ruixiang Wang1, Shengqi Su1, Lei Qi1, Yuanyuan Wang1, Yanan Wang1,2, Yuanjie Zou1,3, Xu Liu1,4, Yiyi Zhang1,5, Jie Hou1, Hongqi Feng1, Qi Li6, Tong Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Keshan disease (KD) is strongly associated with selenium deficiency. Selenoprotein P (SELENOP) is a recognized molecular biomarker of selenoproteins and an important indicator of selenium nutrition. This study was aimed at providing geographically precisely visualized evidence of selenium nutrition at molecular level for assessing KD prevention, control, and elimination on the etiological perspective.Entities:
Keywords: Keshan disease; elimination assessment; precision prevention and control; selenoprotein P; spatial epidemiology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155541 PMCID: PMC8832143 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.827093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Serum SELENOP levels by demographic characteristics and association with KD endemic area (μg/mL).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| All | 6,382 | 4.62 ± 1.82 | 4.58–4.67 | 1,624 | 4.54 ± 2.03 | 4.44–4.64 | 4,758 | 4.66 ± 1.74 | 4.61–4.70 | 0.0250 | |
| Gender | |||||||||||
| Male | 2,462 | 4.70 ± 1.80 | 4.63–4.77 | 529 | 4.65 ± 1.95 | 4.48–4.81 | 1,933 | 4.71 ± 1.76 | 4.64–4.79 | 0.4502 | |
| Female | 3,920 | 4.58 ± 1.83 | 4.52–4.63 | 1,095 | 4.48 ± 2.07 | 4.36–4.61 | 2,825 | 4.61 ± 1.73 | 4.55–4.68 | 0.0465 | |
| Statistics | |||||||||||
| | |||||||||||
| Age (year) | |||||||||||
| <20 | 2,639 | 4.67 ± 1.68 | 4.61–4.74 | 684 | 4.34 ± 1.97 | 4.19–4.48 | 1,955 | 4.79 ± 1.54 | 4.72–4.86 | <0.0001 | |
| 20–24 | 2,504 | 4.63 ± 1.90 | 4.55–4.70 | 654 | 4.74 ± 2.09 | 4.58–4.90 | 1,850 | 4.59 ± 1.82 | 4.51–4.67 | 0.0792 | |
| 25–29 | 1,101 | 4.58 ± 1.99 | 4.47–4.70 | 267 | 4.57 ± 2.02 | 4.33–4.82 | 834 | 4.59 ± 1.98 | 4.45–4.72 | 0.9400 | |
| ≥30 | 138 | 4.00 ± 1.68 | 3.72–4.28 | 19 | 4.33 ± 1.65 | 3.54–5.13 | 119 | 3.94 ± 1.68 | 3.64–4.25 | 0.3473 | |
| Statistics | |||||||||||
| | |||||||||||
| Region | |||||||||||
| Cities | 3,605 | 4.72 ± 1.93 | 4.66–4.78 | 757 | 4.57 ± 2.13 | 4.42–4.72 | 2,848 | 4.76 ± 1.87 | 4.69–4.83 | 0.0148 | |
| Townships | 938 | 4.50 ± 1.74 | 4.39–4.61 | 395 | 4.58 ± 2.08 | 4.37–4.78 | 543 | 4.45 ± 1.43 | 4.33–4.57 | 0.2762 | |
| Rural areas | 1,839 | 4.50 ± 1.64 | 4.43–4.58 | 472 | 4.46 ± 1.81 | 4.29–4.62 | 1,367 | 4.52 ± 1.57 | 4.43–4.60 | 0.4926 | |
| Statistics | |||||||||||
| | |||||||||||
P < 0.05 and the difference between groups were statistically significant.
Figure 1Spatial distribution of the subjects investigated. (A) spatial distribution of the gender of the subjects; (B) spatial distribution of the age of the subjects; (C) spatial distribution of subjects living in KD endemic areas and non-endemic areas; (D) spatial distribution of participants proportion and region proportion in different provinces.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of the mean serum SELENOP levels at the county-level.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of the mean per capita disposable income at the county-level.
Spatial regression analysis of the serum SELENOP and per capita disposable income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4.034083 | 0.116618 | 34.59 | <0.0001 |
| Per capita disposable income | 0.000011 | 0.000003 | 3.52 | 0.0004 |
β.
Figure 4Global spatial autocorrelation analysis of the mean serum SELENOP levels at the county-level. The left side of the figure represents dispersed areas, the right side represents clustered areas, and the middle represents random areas.
Figure 5Clusters identified by local Getis-Ord Gi* analysis for the mean serum SELENOP levels by county in China. Red borders in the spatial thematic map represent KD-endemic areas. Colors in the spatial thematic map represent hot spots and cold spots of spatial clustering with 90, 95, and 99% CI.