| Literature DB >> 35155531 |
Yulian Zhu1, Xiaolong Ji2, Michael Yuen3, Tina Yuen3, Hywel Yuen3, Min Wang1, Deandrae Smith4, Qiang Peng1,2.
Abstract
To improve the rough texture and hypoglycemic ability of sea buckthorn insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), a novel combined modification method was developed in this study. The IDF was treated with ball milling and cellulase treatment to obtain co-modified insoluble dietary fiber (CIDF). The physicochemical and functional properties of IDF, milled insoluble dietary fiber (MIDF), and CIDF were studied. After treatments, MIDF had smaller particle sizes and a looser structure, and CIDF exhibited a wrinkled surface and sparse porous structure according to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction. Compared to IDF, MIDF and CIDF showed improved water-holding, oil-binding, and swelling capacities, improved by 16.13, 14.29, and 15.38%, and 38.5, 22.2, and 25.0%, for MIDF and CIDF, respectively. The cation exchange ability of modified samples showed improvement as well. Treatments also changed the fluidity of MIDF and CIDF. Due to the smaller particles and increased stacking, the bulk density (BD) and angle of repose of MIDF improved by 33.3% and 4.1° compared to IDF, whereas CIDF had a looser structure and thus decreased by 7.1% and 13.3° with increased fluidity. Moreover, the modification also enhanced the effects of CIDF on glucose adsorption, glucose diffusion inhibition, starch digestion inhibition, starch pasting interference, and α-amylase activity inhibition. In summary, IDF modified by ball milling combined with cellulose treatment could be developed as a functional ingredient for regulating glucose content.Entities:
Keywords: cellulase treatment; hypoglycemic ability; insoluble dietary fiber; starch digestion inhibition; α-amylase activity inhibition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155531 PMCID: PMC8837271 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.820672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1The flowchart of the preparation of MIDF and CIDF.
Particle sizes of IDF and MIDF, the physicochemical properties (WHC, OBC, SW, BD, and angle of repose) of IDF, MIDF, and CIDF.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| D10 (μm) | 6.4 ± 0.1a | 4.1 ± 0.1b | |
| D50 (μm) | 122.1 ± 6.3a | 58.2 ± 10.9b | |
| D90 (μm) | 198.1 ± 19.4a | 162.4 ± 36.2b | |
| Mean (μm) | 104.5 ± 6.6a | 72.0 ± 14.9b | |
| Specific surface area (μm2/μm3) | 0.3 ± 0.0b | 0.5 ± 0.0a | |
| WHC | 2.6 ± 0.1b | 3.1 ± 0.1b | 3.6 ± 0.4a |
| OBC | 1.8 ± 0.2b | 2.1 ± 0.1ab | 2.2 ± 0.1a |
| SC | 1.1 ± 0.1b | 1.3 ± 0.2ab | 1.6 ± 0.1a |
| Bulk density (g/ml) | 0.42 ± 0.0b | 0.56 ± 0.1a | 0.39 ± 0.1c |
| Angle of repose (°) | 42.4 ± 2.9b | 46.5 ± 1.9a | 29.1 ± 1.3c |
Different letters in the same row represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2SEM of insoluble dietary fibers with the magnification of 200×, 3,000×, 6,000×, and 12,000×.
Figure 3FT-IR spectra of IDFs.
Figure 4XRD patterns of insoluble dietary fibers.
Figure 5Cation exchange capacity of insoluble dietary fibers.
Figure 6Pasting curves of replacement of CS with insoluble dietary fibers. (A) Effect of different addition of CIDF. (B) Effect of addition with IDF, MIDF, and CIDF.
Figure 7In vitro hypoglycemic properties of IDFs. (A) Glucose adsorption capacity of IDF, MIDF, and CIDF. (B) Glucose diffusion inhibition of IDF, MIDF, and CIDF. (C) Effect on starch digestion of IDF, MIDF, and CIDF. (D) α-amylase activity inhibition of IDF, MIDF, and CIDF.