| Literature DB >> 35155430 |
Ye Yuan1,2, Lulu Tan1,2, Liping Wang1, Danyi Zou3, Jia Liu1, Xiaohuan Lu1,2, Daan Fu1,2, Guobin Wang2, Lin Wang1,3, Zheng Wang1,2.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, due to the heterogeneity of CRC, the clinical therapy outcomes differ among patients. There is a need to identify predictive biomarkers to efficiently facilitate CRC treatment and prognosis.Entities:
Keywords: colorectal cancer; drug resistance; gene signature; hypoxia; prognosis; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155430 PMCID: PMC8829070 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.814621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Identifying hypoxia associated with CRC recurrence free survival (RFS). (A) Forest plot of hazard ratio (HR) for 20 prognostic cancer hallmarks. (B) Kaplan–Meier RFS curves for patients with high hypoxia and low hypoxia scores. (C) Comparison of hypoxia scores in recurrence and no recurrence patients.
FIGURE 2Establishment and validation of HGS in the training cohort. (A) Clustering dendrogram of 518 samples from WGCNA. (B) Heatmap of the correlation between the modules and cancer hallmarks. (C) Correlation between turquoise module and hypoxia. (D) LASSO coefficient profiles of the hypoxia-related prognostic differential expressed genes. (E) 10-fold cross-validation for penalty parameter λ selection in the LASSO model. (F) LASSO coefficients of the 16 hypoxia-related genes. (G) The distribution of HGS score, patients’ status and RFS time. (H) Kaplan–Meier RFS curves for patients in HGS-high and HGS-low groups. (I) GSEA of hypoxia pathway in HGS-high and HGS-low groups. (J) Time-dependent ROC curves at 1, 3 and 5 years. (K) Correlation of HGS with clinicopathological characteristics.
FIGURE 3Validation of HGS in TCGA. (A) Comparison of HGS scores in recurrence and no recurrence patients. (B) Kaplan–Meier RFS curves for patients in HGS-high and HGS-low groups. (C) GSEA of hypoxia pathway in HGS-high and HGS-low groups. (D) Time-dependent ROC curves at 1, 3 and 5 years. (E) Nomogram developed based on HGS and clinicopathological characteristics. (F) Time-dependent ROC curves at 1, 3 and 5 years.
FIGURE 4The correlation between HGS and immune cells, stromal cells infiltration. (A) Spearman correlation analysis between HGS score and immune cells, stromal cells infiltration. (B) The correlation between HGS score and various stromal cells. (C) Forest plot of HR for various prognostic stromal cells. (D) The correlation between hypoxia and cancer hallmarks. (E) The infiltration level of 14 immune cells. (F) The expression pattern of immune checkpoint-related and immune active genes.
FIGURE 5The correlation between HGS and drug resistance. (A) GSEA of cisplatin-resistance, doxorubicin-resistance, multidrug-resistance, and resistance to radiation therapy pathways in HGS-high and HGS-low groups. (B) Comparison of CRC chemotherapy treatment response between HGS-high and HGS-low groups. (C) Kaplan–Meier RFS curves for patients in HGS-high and HGS-low groups. (D) Spearman correlation analysis between the 16 hypoxia genes and 151 chemo drugs.