| Literature DB >> 35155229 |
Zhaodan Xin1,2,3, Jin Li1,2, Haili Zhang3,4, Yi Zhou1,2, Jiajia Song1,2, Piaopiao Chen1,2, Ling Bai1,2, Hao Chen1,2, Juan Zhou1,2, Jie Chen1,2, Binwu Ying1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High recurrence incidence and poor survival after hepatectomy are enormous threats to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, which can be caused by microvascular invasion (MVI). However, it is difficult to predict preoperative MVI status. In this study, we focus on cancer genomic alterations to comprehensively explore potential MVI and early recurrence biomarkers and provide clues to the mechanisms of HCC invasion and metastasis.Entities:
Keywords: cancer genome mutations; circulating tumor DNA; early recurrence; hepatocellular carcinoma; microvascular invasion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155229 PMCID: PMC8828586 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.783109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Clinicopathological characteristics of the HCC cohort.
| Clinicopathological Variables | HCC patients ( | MVI group ( | NMVI group ( |
| Recurrence group ( | Non-recurrence group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 34 (82.93%) | 12 (92.31%) | 22 (78.57%) | 0.521 | 12 (92.31%) | 22 (78.57%) | 0.521 |
| Female | 7 (17.07%) | 1 (7.69%) | 6 (21.43%) | 1 (7.69%) | 6 (21.43%) | ||
| Age (years) mean ± SD | 56.71 ± 11.33 | 56.54 ± 12.17 | 56.79 ± 11.15 | 0.949 | 54.38 ± 11.66 | 57.79 ± 11.22 | 0.378 |
| Height (cm) mean ± SD | 164.98 ± 7.31 | 164.69 ± 8.49 | 165.11 ± 6.87 | 0.868 | 165.31 ± 4.63 | 164.82 ± 8.34 | 0.812 |
| Weight (kg) mean ± SD | 65.96 ± 12.14 | 65.15 ± 9.75 | 66.34 ± 13.25 | 0.775 | 66.85 ± 8.96 | 65.55 ± 13.49 | 0.755 |
| ALT (IU/L) mean ± SD | 53.10 ± 69.16 | 51.08 ± 49.95 | 54.04 ± 77.29 | 0.900 | 53.62 ± 53.15 | 52.86 ± 76.36 | 0.974 |
| AST (IU/L) mean ± SD | 57.27 ± 89.45 | 70.08 ± 94.23 | 51.32 ± 88.28 | 0.539 | 64.92 ± 94.42 | 53.71 ± 88.61 | 0.714 |
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) mean ± SD | 13.79 ± 6.69 | 12.03 ± 3.51 | 14.61 ± 7.66 | 0.148 | 14.64 ± 6.30 | 13.40 ± 6.95 | 0.587 |
| Direct bilirubin (μmol/L) mean ± SD | 5.07 ± 2.99 | 4.62 ± 1.97 | 5.28 ± 3.37 | 0.516 | 5.45 ± 2.78 | 4.89 ± 3.11 | 0.580 |
| Indirect bilirubin (μmol/L) mean ± SD | 8.72 ± 4.00 | 7.42 ± 2.23 | 9.33 ± 4.51 | 0.157 | 9.19 ± 3.99 | 8.51 ± 4.07 | 0.620 |
| HBV‐DNA (IU/ml) | |||||||
| ≥1.00E+02 | 22 (53.66%) | 9 (69.23%) | 13 (46.43%) | 0.173 | 9 (69.23%) | 13 (46.43%) | 0.173 |
| <1.00E+02 | 19 (46.34%) | 4 (30.77%) | 15 (53.57%) | 4 (30.77%) | 15 (53.57%) | ||
| HBs‐Ag | |||||||
| Positive | 32 (78.05%) | 9 (69.23%) | 23 (82.14%) | 0.600 | 9 (69.23%) | 23 (82.14%) | 0.600 |
| Negative | 9 (21.95%) | 4 (30.77%) | 5 (17.86%) | 4 (30.77%) | 5 (17.86%) | ||
| AFP (ng/ml) mean ± SD | 152.99 ± 298.15 | 287.10 ± 435.98 | 133.05 ± 280.92 | 0.18 | 104.56 ± 154.13 | 444.85 ± 1,224.34 | 0.196 |
| PIVKA-II (mAU/ml) mean ± SD | 4,677.00 ± 13,541.05 | 13,230.46 ± 22,187.92 | 705.75 ± 1,123.40 | 0.065 | 5,759.15 ± 11,818.93 | 4,174.57 ± 14,447.69 | 0.732 |
| CEA (ng/ml) mean ± SD | 2.60 ± 2.38 | 2.95 ± 1.35 | 2.44 ± 2.72 | 0.337 | 2.37 ± 1.17 | 2.71 ± 2.81 | 0.680 |
|
| |||||||
| Satellite focus | |||||||
| Yes | 2 (4.88%) | 2 (15.38%) | 0 (0%) | 0.095 | 1 (7.69%) | 1 (3.57%) | 0.539 |
| No | 39 (95.12%) | 11 (84.62%) | 28 (100%) | 12(92.31%) | 27 (96.43%) | ||
| Tumor diameter (cm) mean ± SD | 5.62 ± 3.74 | 8.97 ± 4.59 | 4.07 ± 1.86 |
| 7.52 ± 4.57 | 4.74 ± 2.98 |
|
| Tumor number | |||||||
| Single | 38 (92.68%) | 11 (84.62%) | 27 (96.43%) | 0.232 | 11 (84.62%) | 27 (96.43%) | 0.232 |
| Multiple | 3 (7.32%) | 2 (15.38%) | 1 (3.57%) | 2 (15.38%) | 1 (3.57%) | ||
| Differentiation | |||||||
| Poor differentiation | 14 (34.15%) | 6 (46.15%) | 8 (28.57%) | 0.453 | 8 (61.54%) | 6 (21.43%) |
|
| Moderate differentiation | 27 (65.85%) | 7 (53.85%) | 20 (71.43%) | 5 (38.46%) | 22 (78.57%) | ||
| Cirrhosis | |||||||
| Yes | 15 (36.59%) | 5 (38.46%) | 10 (35.71%) | 1 | 5 (38.46%) | 10 (35.71%) | 1 |
| No | 26 (63.41%) | 8 (61.54%) | 18 (64.29%) | 8 (61.54%) | 18 (64.29%) | ||
| MVI | |||||||
| Yes | 13 (31.71%) | / | / | 8 (61.54%) | 5 (17.86%) |
| |
| No | 28 (68.29%) | 5 (38.46%) | 23 (82.14%) | ||||
| MVI number | |||||||
| >0 and ≤5 | 9 (21.95%) | / | / | 4 (30.77%) | 5 (17.86%) |
| |
| >5 | 4 (9.76%) | ||||||
| 0 | 28 (68.29%) | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Cirrhosis | |||||||
| Yes | 17 (41.46%) | 6 (46.15%) | 11 (39.29%) | 0.678 | 6 (46.15%) | 11 (39.29%) | 0.678 |
| No | 24 (58.54%) | 7 (53.85%) | 17 (60.71%) | 7 (53.85%) | 17 (60.71%) | ||
| Portal hypertension | |||||||
| Yes | 18 (43.90%) | 7 (53.85%) | 11 (39.29%) | 0.382 | 7 (53.85%) | 11 (39.29%) | 0.382 |
| No | 23 (56.10%) | 6 (46.15%) | 17 (60.71%) | 6 (46.15%) | 17 (60.71%) | ||
| BCLC staging | |||||||
| 0/A | 35 (85.37%) | 9 (69.23%) | 26 (92.86%) | 0.129 | 10 (76.92%) | 25 (89.29%) | 0.57 |
| B | 6 (14.63%) | 4 (30.77%) | 2 (7.14%) | 3 (23.08%) | 3 (10.71%) | ||
| Recurrence (≤12 months) | |||||||
| Yes | 13 (31.71%) | 8 (61.54%) | 5 (17.86%) |
| / | / | |
| No | 28 (68.29%) | 5 (38.46%) | 23 (82.14%) | ||||
* and bold font indicate p-value < 0.05.
Figure 1The correlation of MVI status and recurrence-free survival.
Figure 2Genomic landscape of mutations in HCC cohorts. (A, B) are heatmaps illustrating top 20 mutant genes of tumor tissues and ctDNA samples in our HCC patients, respectively, with MVI status groups and early-recurrence status groups as well as guanine transformation types. (C, D) are heatmaps illustrating concordant genes between top 20 mutant genes of tumor tissues and top 20 mutant genes of ctDNA, respectively. (E, F) demonstrate somatic interactions via exclusive/co-occurrence event analysis on top 20 mutated genes in tumor tissue samples and ctDNA samples, respectively.
Figure 3(A) Top 10 differentially mutated genes sorted according to p-value between MVI and NMVI groups reflecting association between genomic alterations of tumor tissues and MVI status. (B) Top 10 differentially mutated genes sorted according to p-value between recurrence and non-recurrence groups reflecting association between genomic alterations of tumor tissues and early-recurrence status. (C, D) illustrated the functional process enrichment of top 20 GO (BP) enriched terms in MVI patients and early-recurrence patients, respectively.
Figure 4Association between classic signaling pathways alterations in tumor tissues and MVI or early-recurrence status. (A) Comparison of mutation frequency of classic tumor pathways (i.e., Rap1, MAPK, Ras, and NF-kappa B signaling pathways) between MVI and NMVI patients. (B) Comparison of mutation frequency of Rap1, MAPK, Ras and NF-kappa B signaling pathways between early-recurrence and non-recurrence patients.
Figure 5Association between genomic alterations of ctDNA and MVI or recurrence status. (A) Top 10 differentially mutated genes sorted according to p-value between MVI and NMVI groups. (B) Top 10 differentially mutated genes sorted according to p-value between recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Figure 6Comparison of the maximal VAF of ctDNA between (A) MVI and NMVI groups; (B) recurrence and non-recurrence groups. (C) ROC curve indicating the performance of ctDNA maximal VAF in determining the presence of MVI in plasma samples. ** indicates p-value < 0.01; ns indicates p-value > 0.05.