| Literature DB >> 35155218 |
Lingdi Yin1,2, Yichao Lu1,2, Cheng Cao1,2, Zipeng Lu1,2, Jishu Wei1,2, Xiaole Zhu1,2, Jianmin Chen1,2, Feng Guo1,2, Min Tu1,2, Chunhua Xi1,2, Kai Zhang1,2, Junli Wu1,2, Wentao Gao1,2, Kuirong Jiang1,2, Yi Miao1,2, Qiang Li1,2, Yunpeng Peng1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to integrate pancreatic cancer TCGA, GEO, and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets, and explore the potential prognostic markers and underlying mechanisms of the immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer through bioinformatics methods, in vitro and in vivo assays.Entities:
Keywords: CA9; CD8+ T cells; immunotherapy; pancreatic cancer; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155218 PMCID: PMC8828571 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.832315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Comprehensive analysis of TME components of TCGA pancreatic cancer patients indicate the prognostic value of CD8+ T cells. (A) TCGA pancreatic cancer transcriptome sequencing data CIBERSORT analysis results show the main infiltrating immune cells in pancreatic cancer. (B–D) TCGA data suggest that the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer with high CD8+ T cell infiltration, high monocyte infiltration, and low macrophage M0 is significantly better. (E) Volcano plots of DEGs between CD8+ T cells high infiltration group and low group. X-axis indicates the fold change (log scaled), whereas the Y-axis shows the p values (log scaled). Each symbol represents a different gene, and the red/blue color of the symbols categorize the upregulated/downregulated genes falling under different criteria (p value and fold change threshold). p value <0.05 is considered as statistically significant, whereas fold change >1 is set as the threshold. (F) Heatmaps of the top 8 DEGs between between CD8+ T cells high infiltration group and low group.
Figure 2Enrichment Analysis of DEGs identified from comparing CD8+ T cells high infiltration group and low infiltration group. (A) Bubble plot of significant KEGG pathways. X-axis indicates the gene ratio, whereas the Y-axis shows the most enriched KEGG pathways. And the size of bubble presents genes number, and the color of bubble presents the P value. (B–D) GO analyses of the DEGs according to their biological process, cellular component and molecular function. X-axis indicates the gene number, whereas the Y-axis shows the most enriched GO terms.
Figure 3Prognostic value of CA9 and its association with CD8+ T cells infiltration from TCGA and GEO pancreatic cancer dataset. (A) Risk score plot and heatmap of CA9 among TCGA pancreatic cancer patients. (B) Survival time and status for patients with high and low expression of CA9. (C) ROC analysis of overall survival for the CA9 gene signature in TCGA cohort. (D, E). TCGA cohort data suggest that CD8+ T cell infiltration and CA9 expression are closely related, and GEO dataset GSE131050 confirms this phenomenon.
Figure 4Single-cell sequencing data suggests that CA9 is mainly expressed in cancer cells and is related to the proportion of CD8+ T cells. (A, B) Pancreatic cancer single-cell sequencing dataset PAAD_CRA001160 analysis results show that CA9 is mainly expressed in pancreatic cancer cells. (C) Analysis of cell subsets in PAAD_CRA001160 single-cell sequencing dataset. (D) CA9 expression of the cancer cell cluster in the single-cell dataset is correlated with CD8+ T cell infiltration.
Clinical characteristics of patients included in TMA analysis.
| Characteristics | CA9_Low (N = 39) | CA9_High (N = 40) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 1.00 | ||
| F | 16(20.25%) | 16(20.25%) | |
| M | 23(29.11%) | 24(30.38%) | |
| Age | 0.75 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 61.69 ± 9.80 | 60.88 ± 12.32 | |
| Median[min-max] | 61.00[41.00,77.00] | 63.50[32.00,80.00] | |
| T stage | 0.59 | ||
| 1 | 3(3.80%) | 1(1.27%) | |
| 2 | 5(6.33%) | 3(3.80%) | |
| 3 | 28(35.44%) | 33(41.77%) | |
| 4 | 3(3.80%) | 3(3.80%) | |
| N stage |
| ||
| 0 | 28(35.44%) | 18(22.78%) | |
| 1 | 11(13.92%) | 22(27.85%) | |
| M stage | 0.99 | ||
| 0 | 38(48.10%) | 40(50.63%) | |
| 1 | 1(1.27%) | 0(0.0e+0%) | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.69 | ||
| no | 12(15.19%) | 15(18.99%) | |
| yes | 27(34.18%) | 25(31.65%) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.33 | ||
| no | 36(45.57%) | 33(41.77%) | |
| yes | 3(3.80%) | 7(8.86%) |
Bold value means statistically significant.
Figure 6(A) SLC-0111 inhibits CA9 expression and up-regulate CD8+ T cells in vivo. (B) TMA IHC analysis showed that CA9 high expression is associated with worse survival (Examples of CA9 expression in pancreatic cancer patients). (C) CA9 expression is significantly associated with overall survival of patients.
Figure 5CA9 induce acidic microenvironment and inhibit CD8+ T cells. (A) The expression of CA9 in pancreatic cancer cell lines is significantly higher than that of normal pancreatic duct cell lines. (B) After adding CA9 specific inhibitor SLC-0111 (50uM), the pH value of the pancreatic cancer culture supernatant is significantly increased. (C) Adding CA9 inhibitor to pancreatic cancer cell line and PBMC cell co-culture can up-regulate CD8+ T cells. Using NaOH to adjust the pH value to the same as the CA9 inhibitor group partially up-regulate CD8+ T cells. (D, E) In vivo experiments indicate that the C57BL/6 mouse model of tumor formation was randomly divided into two groups after tumor formation, and intraperitoneal injection of normal saline and SLC-0111 for three weeks respectively. Tumors of mice injected with SLC-0111 were significantly smaller than the control group. * means p<0.05 and ** means p<0.01.
Figure 7Enrichment Analysis of DEGs identified from comparing CA9 high expression group and low expression group. (A, B) Bubble plot of significant KEGG pathways. X-axis indicates the gene ratio, whereas the Y-axis shows the most enriched KEGG pathways. And the size of bubble presents genes number, and the color of bubble presents the P value. (C, D) GO analyses of the DEGs according to their biological process, cellular component and molecular function. X-axis indicates the gene number, whereas the Y-axis shows the most enriched GO terms.
Figure 8The association between CA9 expression and immune checkpoints, tumor mutation burden and ferroptosis-related genes from TCGA dataset. (A) Comparison of immune checkpoints expression among CA9-high tumor tissues and CA9-low tumor tissues. (B) Correlation analysis of CA9 expression and TMB. The horizontal axis in the figure represents the expression distribution of the gene, and the ordinate is the expression distribution of the TMB score. The density curve on the right represents the distribution trend of the TMB score; the upper density curve represents the distribution trend of the gene; the top side The value represents the correlation p value, correlation coefficient and correlation calculation method. (C-E). The expression distribution of Ferroptosis-related mRNA in CA9-high and CA9-low tumor tissues, where the horizontal axis represents different mRNA, the vertical axis represents the mRNA expression distribution, where different colors represent different groups, and the upper left corner represents the significance p-value test method.Asterisks represent levels of significance *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.