| Literature DB >> 35155130 |
Vijesh Chaudhary1, Smrutirekha Mohanty2, Poonam Malik3, A Apsara Saleth Mary4, Jnaneshwar Pai Maroor5, M Z M Nomani6.
Abstract
Many organizations are rapidly changing their procedures due to the rapid spread of corona virus (COVID-19) worldwide. Several companies have switched their entire workforce to temporary telecommuting and remote work. Like other employee-characters, there is believed to be a change in employee engagement as well. This research seeks to examine and statistically assess factors that can impact the employee engagement level. We collected data from 208 employees who are working from home in India with online questionnaire. Engagement scores have been calculated using UWES-14 (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale). We examined the impact of total 10 variables using multiple regression analysis. Our regression results suggest that proper virtual tools, contact by the organization leaders, mental health checkup and virtual training increases the employee engagement. Female employees are found to be more engaged than male employees while working from home. The number of kids are found to have negative impact on employee engagement. This implies that if the number of kids increases, the virtual employee engagement decreases. Our results could not find any significant impact of virtual teamwork, marital status, and entertainment tools on employee engagement. Based on the research results, this study make few recommendations. First, organizations should facilitate the improvement of virtual tools such as internet speed and personal computer configuration. Second, the salary employees should not be decreased. Third, the top organization leaders should have frequent contact with the employees, increase virtual training, and should encourage the employees to undergo the regular mental health checkup.Entities:
Keywords: Covid-19; Employee engagement; Multiple regression; UWES-14; Working from home
Year: 2021 PMID: 35155130 PMCID: PMC8820468 DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Proc ISSN: 2214-7853
UWES-14 (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale) 14 factors: 6 + 5 + 6.
| At my work, I feel bursting with energy (VI1 | |
| At my job, I feel strong and vigorous (VI2), | |
| When i get up in the morning, I feel like going to work (VI3), | |
| I can continue working for very long periods at a time (VI4) | |
| At my job, I am very resilient mentally (VI5) | |
| At my work, I always preserve, even when things do not go well (VI6) | |
| I find the work that i do full of meaning and purposes (DE1), | |
| I am enthusiastic about my job (DE2), | |
| My job inspires me (DE3), | |
| I am proud on the work that i do (DE4), | |
| To me, my job is challenging, (DE5), | |
| Time flies when I am working (AB1), | |
| When I am working, I forget everything else around me (AB2), | |
| I feel happy when I am working intensely (AB3) | |
| I’m immersed in my work (AB4), | |
| i get carried away when I’m working (AB5) | |
| It is difficult to detach myself from my job (AB6), | |
Dependent and independent Variables.
| Engagement | Dependent variable | Virtual engagement score of each employee. The variable is calculated with UWES (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale) | As the dependent variable |
| Sex | independent variable (Categorical) | Sex of each employee | To check whether the gender of employees affect the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 1) |
| Salary | independent variable (Continuous) | Monthly salary of each employee | To check whether the monthly salary of employees affect the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 2) |
| Contact | independent variable (Continuous) | Number of contact the leaders do with each employee | To check whether the contact with leaders affect the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 3) |
| Mental | independent variable (Continuous) | Number of monthly mental health checkup | To check whether the monthly mental health checkup affect the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 4) |
| Tools | independent variable (Categorical) | Right virtual tools such as fast Wifi connection at home | To check whether the right virtual tools affect the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 5) |
| Training | independent variable (Categorical) | Online training for each employee | To check whether the virtual trainings affect the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 6) |
| Enter | independent variable (Categorical) | Entertainment activities such as online Yoga class, fun quizzes etc. | To check whether the entertainment activities affect the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 7) |
| Team | independent variable (Categorical) | Virtual teamwork | To check whether the virtual teamwork affects virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 8) |
| Marital | independent variable (Categorical) | Marital status of employee | To check whether Marital status of employees impact the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 9) |
| Kids | independent variable (Continuous) | Number of kids at home (if the employee is married) | To check whether the number of kids impact the virtual employee engagement (Hypothesis 10) |
| u | Residuals | The error term or residual of OLS model | To capture the unknown leftover variables from the model |
Results from Multiple regression analysis.
| Dependent Variable: Employee Engagement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method: Least Squares | ||||
| Sample (adjusted): 208 | ||||
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-Statistic | Prob. |
| Sex | −2.478159 | 0.25667 | 9.677784 | 0.0004 |
| Salary | 1.65999 | 1.94483 | 3.347732 | 0.0169 |
| Contact | 2.67897 | 0.94483 | 2.657895 | 0.0457 |
| Mental | 0.79668 | 0.62428 | 2.245228 | 0.0294 |
| Tools | 1.00768 | 0.54857 | 4.384748 | 0.0046 |
| Training | 0.98474 | 0.65873 | 2.2374744 | 0.0668 |
| Enter | 0.4356 | 0.14575 | 0.55783 | 0.5647 |
| Team | 0.5688 | 0.10338 | 0.84803 | 0.4747 |
| Marital | 0.23484 | 0.14894 | 0.64483 | 0.6477 |
| Kids | −0.65748 | 0.88753 | −3.98474 | 0.0074 |
| C | 8.7683 | 8.3799 | 5.017624 | 0.0044 |
| R-squared | 0.622871 | Mean dependent var | 517.8660 | |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.604420 | S.D. dependent var | 134.6166 | |
| S.E. of regression | 59.53343 | Akaike info criterion | 11.11539 | |
| Sum squared resid | 170123.0 | Schwarz criterion | 11.33639 | |
| Log likelihood | −294.1156 | Hannan-Quinn criter. | 11.20062 | |
| F-statistic | 44.59774 | Durbin-Watson stat | 0.438941 | |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.0003 | |||