| Literature DB >> 35155056 |
Shahab Ud-Din Khan1, Riaz Khan1, Shahid Hussain1.
Abstract
In the recent past, plasma waste technology has emerged to be an environmental friendly and beneficial technology. In this review, current status of thermal plasma, non-thermal plasma and its application for nano-scale high-tech plasmonic materials based on the scientific and technical comprehensive observation are included. Generally, thermal plasma is used for solid waste treatment but non-thermal plasma is being utilized for plasmonic materials. The current research incorporated in two phases: thermal plasma and non-thermal plasma. In the first phase, understanding and detailed information about plasma torches have been included such as DC transfer and non-transfer arc plasma torches. In addition, solid waste treatment, municipal waste, healthcare issue, steel making and treatment through plasma jet injection have been reviewed extensively. In the second phase, state-of-the-art review has been addressed for dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) and its utility for plasmonic materials. The analysis concluded that the thermal plasma is the optimal choice for treating solid waste issues and the application of non-thermal plasma such as DBD is the most useful and latest approach for plasmonic material. The prime objective of this review is not only to provide the comparison between thermal or non-thermal plasma but to recommend the ideal and most optimized suitable technique for solid waste treatment and bio-medical applications. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Health care; Non-thermal plasma; Plasmonic materials; Solid waste; Thermal plasma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155056 PMCID: PMC8818365 DOI: 10.1007/s13204-022-02342-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Nanosci ISSN: 2190-5517 Impact factor: 3.674
Global analysis of solid waste through thermal and non-thermal plasma for nano-scale high-tech plasmonic materials
| Non-thermal plasma (Wiegand et al. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Main author (with ref.) | Description | Reference year |
| Wiegand et al. ( | Recent development and principles are discussed 1. Study about Cold atmospheric pressure plasmas (CAPPs) 2. Investigation of antimicrobial effect 3. Method: Plasma BLASTER MEF | 2017 |
| Chen and Wirz ( | Recent development and principles are discussed 1. Development of CAS devices 2. Implement to COVID-19 3. Advantages of sanitation and treatment | 2020 |
| Domonkos et al. ( | Research focused on following main points 1. Plasma treatment 2. Surface modification 3. Atmospheric pressure and low-temperature plasma 4. Plasma medicine and agriculture research 5. Pathogen inactivation investigation | 2021 |
| Kampf et al. ( | 1. Address SARS-CoV-2 2. Describe human to human transmission process 3. Analysis: SARS, MERS, HCoV 4. Efficiently inactivated: 62–71% ethanol, 0.5% hydrogen peroxide 5. Less effective: 0.05–0.2% benzalkonium chloride | 2020 |
| Ollegott et al. ( | Recent development and principles are discussed 1. Investigate: non-thermal plasma, heterogeneous catalyst, chemical transformations, High densities of reactive species, presents several plasma-catalytic DBD applications | 2020 |
| Stryczewska ( | Review base on non-thermal plasma reactors (NTPR) 1. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) 2. Atmospheric pressure plasma jets (APPJ) 3. Gliding arc discharge (GAD) | 2020 |
| Izadjoo et al. ( | Detailed explanation about waste treatment through cold plasma 1. Describe the broad spectrum antimicrobial technology and causes of high incidence of infections 2. Increasing of wound healing by: monocyte stimulation, keratinocyte proliferation, cutaneous microcirculation 3. Dentist treatment through CAP 4. Aim to provide the therapeutic application of the cold plasma technology | 2018 |
| Laroussi ( | Review based on plasma medicine 1. Target: applications including wound healing and cancer treatment 2. Research expanded to: low-temperature plasma and biological cells and tissues | 2018 |
| Sarangapani et al. ( | Detailed explanation about waste treatment through cold plasma 1. Investigate the efficacy of cold plasma treatment 2. This is potential bio-decontamination technology and can be apply to food products 3. Efficiency: DBD, 50 Hz, 0–5 min, air, 80 kV, 80.18% for boscalid, 75.62% for Imidacloprid 4. Investigation: effective chemical decontamination of blueberries | 2017 |
| Hertwig et al. ( | Research focused on following main points 1. Investigation: cold atmospheric pressure plasma, ATCC BAA-1045 2. Efficiency: SDBD, 20 kV, 15 kHz, 15 min 3. Gases: air, N2, CO2 4. Result: browning of unpeeled almond surface color 5. Suggestion: pasteurization of almonds treatment through cold plasma is an alternative technology | 2017 |
| Sarangapani et al. ( | 1. Efficiency: radio frequency plasma, 13.56 MHz, 30 W to 50 W, 5 to 15 min 2. Pressure: 2 Pa and air with 0.15 mbar 3. Result: decrease the hardness, moisture and ash | 2017 |
| Kim et al. ( | 1. Efficiency: atmospheric pressure plasma, 75–125 W, 13.56 MHz, 60–90 s 2. Gases: He, He + O2 3. Results: pH has no change and L* comparatively increase | 2011 |
| Thermal plasma (Inaba and Iwao | ||
| Inaba and Iwao ( | Detailed explanation about waste treatment through DC discharge plasma 1. Solid waste 2. Low-level nuclear waste 3. Aluminum 4. Fly ash 5. Asbestos | 2000 |
| Chang ( | Recent development and principles are discussed 1. Plasma pollution control technology 2. Reactor technology 3. Material generated pollution | 2001 |
| Chang ( | Main focused on plasma pollution control and their limitation based on chemistry and physics knowledge | 2008 |
| Urashima and Chang ( | Recent development and principles are discussed 1. Gaseous pollution control technology 2. Reactor technology | 2000 |
| Chang et al. ( | The research execute three main focused 1. Ash volume reduction based on plasma torch 2. Comparison of three phase arc processes based on incineration source 3. Detailed explanation and comparison for solid product detoxicity | 2005 |
| Chu et al. ( | Research focused on following main points 1. Vitrified slag and their effectiveness of an indirect plasma heating 2. INER system 3. Monolithic metal nugget 4. Gravity effect | 1998 |
| Tzeng et al. ( | Research and development of non-transferred plasma torch 1. Introduce homemade non-transfer plasma torch 2. Power: 100 KW 3. Plasma furnace: 10 kg/h 4. Temperature: 1700 °C and 1650 °C 5. Obtained high quality for Glassy or ceramic slags 6. Achieved simulation results of radioactive wastes by plasma torch 7. Leaching indices are all greater than ROC regulated values | 1998 |
| Chang et al. ( | Development of electrohydraulic discharge systems 1. Treatment mechanisms 2. Treatment of chemical contaminants 3. PAED municipal sludge treatment | 2008 |
| Yantsis et al. ( | Author deal (PAED) plasma to prevent secondary contamination problems specifications 1. Used zooplankton species 2. Ranges of Daphnia magna (1.5–2.5 mm; mean length of 1.81 mm) 3. Treatment applied = 0.5 kJ/pulse PAED in a 3-L reactor | 2008 |
| Ching et al. ( | EHD (electrohydraulic discharges) has been studied with the specification of 5.5 kV and 90 KA | 2001 |
| Karpel Vel Leitner et al. | PAED (pulsed arc electrohydraulic discharge) system has been studied to find out aqueous solutions | 2005 |
| Yamatake. et al. ( | Two main focused on the research 1. Study of PAED (pulsed arc electrohydraulic discharge) system for eccentric electrode cylindrical reactor 2. Application of PBSW (phosphate-buffered saline water) | 2006 |
| Yuan et al. ( | Detailed explanation about waste treatment through DC discharge plasma 1. DC non-transferred arc plasma torch (DC water plasma) | 2010 |
| Hoornweg and Perinaz ( | Provide the extensive review of solid waste treatment (SWT) | 2012 |
| Margallo et al. ( | Main focused of the research are 1. Bottom ash 2. Environmental management 3. Solid waste incineration 4. Life cycle assessment approach | 2014 |
| Zhao et al. ( | Recent development and principles are discussed regarding the issue of bottom ashes and medical waste incinerator | 2010 |
| Carnogurská, et al. ( | Research focused on MSW (municipal solid waste) fly ash treatment and application of plasma measurement | 2015 |
| Lazar et al. ( | Main focused of the research are 1. Obtained result for fly ash 2. Obtained result for high-temperature gasification of RDF 3. Incineration of municipal waste | 2015 |
| Pan et al. ( | Research and development of detoxifying PCDD/Fs, fly ash, medical waste incineration and DC double are plasma torch | 2013 |
| Pan and Xie ( | Detailed explanation of melting incinerator ashes and development of DC plasma torch | 2014 |
| Yi-Ming et al. ( | Main focused of the research are 1. Material research 2. Vitrification of municipal solid waste 3. Fly ash | 2012 |
| Vu et al. ( | Main focused of the research are 1. Bottom ash 2. Fly ash 3. Glass–ceramic | 2012 |
Grouping of plasma types (Chen 1974; Chang 2006, 2009)
| Plasma type | State | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal plasma (quasi-equilibrium) | 1. Solid and liquid waste treatments 2. Material processing 3. Microwave devices 4. Coating and ceramic processing 5. Cutting 6. Welding | |
| Non-thermal plasma (non-equilibrium) | 1. Air pollution control 2. Polymer coating and treatments 3. Wound healing and cancer treatment 4. Biological cells and tissues 5. Bio-decontamination 6. Cold plasma treatment |
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of direct current (DC) thermal plasma torches (Murphy 1999): a transferred arc, b non-transferred arc (copyright permission)
Fig. 2Solid waste management and their types
Fig. 3Plasma ash melting system in Matsuyama (Chang 2009) (with copy right permission)
Hospital incineration and chemical analysis (Cedzynska et al. 1999) (with copyright permission)
| Oxide | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | Mn3O4 | TiO2 | CaO | Na2O | MgO | K2O | P2O5 | SO3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital incinerator bottom ash | 47.35 | 3.05 | 7.35 | a | a | 16.25 | a | 2.45 | a | 0.30 | 0.48 |
| Coal power plant fly ash | 50.02 | 23.20 | 9.25 | 0.15 | 0.96 | 4.08 | 0.96 | 2.48 | 3.40 | 0.32 | 0.52 |
Plasma torch system built in Korea for the treatment of medical wastes (Park et al. 2005) (with copy right permission)
| Parameters | N1 plasma torch | N2 plasma torch |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 40–45 kW | 65–85 kW |
| Airflow | 4–6 g/s | 7–9 g/s |
| Plasma jet temperatures | 3.0–4.0 K | 2.5–4.0 K |
Annually worldwide solid waste from steel industry (Ye et al. 2003) (with copy right permission)
| Major concerns | Free lime, heavy metals | Leaching of heavy metals | Too low Zn for recovery | Too high Zn for recycling | Hazardous wastes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| World (Mtons) | BOF slag | EAF slag | BOF dust | – | EAF dust |
| 90 | 25 | 15 | – | 4 |
Fig. 4Plasma treatment of aqueous solutions by experimental reactor (Samokhin et al. 2010) (with copyright permission)
Fig. 5Flowchart shown the schemes and characterization of dielectric barrier pulsed discharge plasma for bio-medical applications
Fig. 6Contamination process (Laroussi et al. 2012)
Fig. 7Formation of biofilm and stages (Laroussi et al. 2012)
Fig. 8a Velocity magnitude contour, b velocity profile of argon flow at 7 L/min (Donnelly et al. 2006)