| Literature DB >> 35155036 |
Turki Alajmi1, Asmaa F Sharif2,3, Majd A Majoun4, Fedaa S Alshehri4, Alanood M Albaqami4, Mohammed Alshouli5.
Abstract
Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures remain the gold standard of treatment, but the traditional extensile approach has been associated with relatively frequent complications. The current study aims to evaluate the less invasive sinus tarsi approach and to elaborate on the associated complications, risk factors, and outcome predictors. A retrospective observational study was carried out among 39 patients diagnosed with calcaneal fractures that were operatively treated between January 2019 and January 2020 at a level-one trauma center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients were assessed regarding the complications, pre- and postoperative Bohler's angle, Gissane's angle, calcaneal height, and return to baseline function. Patients older than 60 years show significantly more complications compared to younger patients (p < 0.05). Type IV calcaneal fracture, according to Sander's classification, showed significantly more complications than other types (p < 0.05). There were significant variations in pre- and postoperative Bohler's angle and calcaneal height (p < 0.05). These variations apply to the Gissane's angle but do not rise to significant results (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the current study reports a significant moderate direct correlation between delay time and complication incidence (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach has relatively low complications and excellent clinical and radiological outcomes. Older patients and those who are diagnosed with type IV calcaneal factures, besides those presented with more delay, are more associated with unfavorable complications.Entities:
Keywords: bohler angle; calcaneal fractures; gissane’s angle; internal fixation; minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155036 PMCID: PMC8813407 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1(A) X-rays of calcaneal fractures before surgical approach. (B) X-rays of calcaneal fractures after the minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach
Figure 2Steps of the minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach for open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures
Demographics and past medical history of patients enrolled in the current study
| Variables | Number (out of 39) | Percentage (100%) | |
| Demographics | |||
| Age group | 16-<20 | 4 | 10.3 |
| 20-<30 | 7 | 17.9 | |
| 30-<40 | 16 | 41.0 | |
| 40-<50 | 8 | 20.5 | |
| 50-<60 | 2 | 5.1 | |
| 60 and more | 2 | 5.1 | |
| Gender | Female | 8 | 20.5 |
| Male | 31 | 79.5 | |
| Occupation | Builder | 17 | 43.6 |
| Driver | 2 | 5.1 | |
| Student | 7 | 17.9 | |
| Housemaid | 6 | 15.4 | |
| Unemployed | 7 | 17.9 | |
| Past medical history | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | No diabetes | 37 | 94.9 |
| diabetic patient | 2 | 5.1 | |
| Hypertension | No hypertension | 36 | 92.3 |
| Hypertensive patients | 3 | 7.7 | |
| Smoking | Non-smoker | 25 | 64.1 |
| Smoker | 14 | 35.9 | |
Figure 3Distribution of mechanism and type of trauma, associated skeletal injuries, and complications among cases diagnosed with calcaneal fracture included in the current study
Figure 4Sander's classification of calcaneal fractures among the studied cohort
Demographics and clinical criteria of the patients enrolled in the current study
*Significance < 0.05.
| Variables | No complications n (%) | Complications n (%) | Chi-square test | p-values | |
| Age group (years) | 16-19 | 4 (11.8) | 0 (0) |
| 0.002* |
| 20-29 | 6 (17.6) | 1 (20) | |||
| 30-39 | 15 (44.1) | 1 (20) | |||
| 40-49 | 8 (23.5) | 0 (0) | |||
| 50-59 | 1 (2.9) | 1 (20) | |||
| 60 and above | 0 (0) | 2 (40) | |||
| Gender | Female | 7 (20.6) | 1 (20) |
| 0.976 |
| Male | 27 (79.4) | 4 (80) | |||
| Occupation | Builder | 14 (41.2) | 3 (60) |
| 0.778 |
| Driver | 2 (5.9) | 0 (0) | |||
| Student | 7 (20.6) | 0 (0) | |||
| Housemaid | 5 (14.6) | 1 (20) | |||
| Unemployed | 6 (17.7) | 1 (20) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | No diabetes | 33 (97.1) | 4 (80|) |
| 0.106 |
| Diabetic patient | 1 (2.9) | 1 (20) | |||
| Hypertension | No hypertension | 32 (94.1) | 4 (80) |
| 0.269 |
| Hypertensive patients | 2 (5.9) | 1 (20) | |||
| Smoking | Non-smoker | 21 (61.8) | 4 (80) |
| 0.427 |
| Smoker | 13 (38.2) | 1 (20) | |||
| Type of trauma | Unilateral | 25 (37.5) | 3 (60) |
| 0.530 |
| Bilateral | 9 (26.5) | 2 (40) | |||
| Associated skeletal injuries | No | 23 (67.6) | 2 (40) |
| 0.229 |
| Yes | 11 (32.4) | 3 (60) | |||
| Mechanism of trauma | Fall from height | 26 (76.5) | 5 (100) |
| 0.224 |
| Road traffic accident | 8 (23.5) | 0 (0) | |||
| Sander’s classification of calcaneal fracture | Type I | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) |
| 0.03* |
| Type II | 1 (2.9) | 1 (20) | |||
| Type III | 22 (64.7) | 0 (0) | |||
| Type IV | 10 (29.4) | 4 (80) | |||
Preoperative and postoperative radiological measurements among cases diagnosed with calcaneal fracture according to their outcomes
*Significance < 0.05.
| Preoperative | Postoperative | 95% CI (lower-upper) | t | P | Paired sample correlation | P-value of correlation | |
| Mean difference (SD) | |||||||
| Bohler's angle | -11.051 (9.622) | (-14.170-7.932) | -7.173 | <0.001* | 0.738 | <0.001* | |
| Gissane's angle | 3.359 (26.581) | (-5.258-11.976) | 0.789 | 0.435 | 0.134 | 0.403 | |
| Calcaneal height | -0.4538 (0.4198) | (-0.5899-0.3178|) | -6.751 | <0.001* | 0.586 | <0.001* | |
Radiological measurements and delay time among the cases diagnosed with calcaneal fracture according to their outcomes
*Significance < 0.05.
CI, Confidence interval; ORIF, open reduction and internal fixation.
| Radiological measurements | All cases | Recovered with no complications | Recovered with complications | Mean difference | 95% CI (lower-upper) | Test of significance | p-values | |
| Preoperative Bohler’s angle | Min-max | -38-24 | -38-23 | 0-24 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 2.44 (14.033) | 1.26 (14.315) | 10.40(9.450) | -9.135 | -22.5984.327 | t-1.375 | 0.177 | |
| Postoperative Bohler’s angle | Min-max | -15-38 | -15-38 | 9-18 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 13.49 (12.043) | 13.38 (12.861) | 14.20 (3.564) | -0.818 | -22.598-4.327 | t-0.140 | 0.889 | |
| Change in Bohler’s angle | Min-max | -10-40 | 0-40 | -10-10 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 11.05 (9.622) | 12.12 (467) | 3.80 (8.044) | 8.318 | -6.440-4.804 | t-2.108 | 0.070 | |
| Restoration of normal Bohler’s angle | Yes | 34 | 29 | 5 | c2 0.843 | 0.358 | ||
| No | 5 | 5 | 0 | |||||
| Preoperative Gissane’s angle | Min-max | 38-180 | 38-180 | 95-137 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 123.59 (25.214) | 124.79 (26.294) | 115.40 (15.469) | 9.394 | -15.205-33.994 | t-0.774 | 0.444 | |
| Postoperative Gissane’s angle | Min-max | 78-145 | 78-145 | 115-131 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 120.23 (12.575) | 120.03 (13.329) | 121.60 (5.899) | -1.571 | -13.931-10.790 | t-0.257 | 0.798 | |
| Change in Gissane’s angle | Min-max | -64-92 | -64-92 | -6-20 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | -3.36 (26.583) | -4.76 (28.035) | 6.20 (9.859) | -10.965 | -36.851-14.922 | t-0.858 | 0.396 | |
| Restoration of normal Gissane’s angle | Yes | 16 | 15 | 1 | c2 1.048 | 0.306 | ||
| No | 23 | 19 | 4 | |||||
| Preoperative calcaneal height | Min-max | 2.4-4.6 | 2.4-4.6 | 3.5-4.6 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 3.707 (0.483) | 3.771 (0.4908) | 3.980 (0.4266) | -0.2094 | -0.6794-0.2606 | t-0.903 | 0.372 | |
| Postoperative calcaneal height | Min-max | 3.5-5.3 | 3.5- 5 | 3.7-5.3 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 4.251 (0.434) | 4.229 (0.4153) | 4.400 (0.5788) | -0.1706 | -0.5936-0.2525 | t-0.817 | 0.419 | |
| Change in calcaneal height | Min-max | -0.4-1.5 | 0.4-1.5 | 0.2-0.7 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 0.454 (0.420) | 0.459 (0.443) | 0.420 (0.228) | 0.039 | -0.374-0.452 | t-0.191 | 0.850 | |
| Delay time from admission until ORIF (days) | Min-max | 2-55 | 2-55 | 14-20 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 11.72 (8.805) | 10.76 (9.012) | 18.20 (2.490) | -7.435 | -11.370-3.500 | t-3.903 | <0.001* | |
Figure 5Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of delay time (days) as an outcome predictor among the cases of calcaneal fractures included in the current study