| Literature DB >> 35154721 |
Yotaro Motomura1, Yoshihiro Umezawa2, Tomoyuki Arimatsu1, Keigo Okada1, Osamu Miura2, Takashi Kumagai1.
Abstract
We report a case of fever of unknown origin in a patient with MDS associated with IgM-MGUS. The patient was positive for MYD88 mutation, and chemotherapy for LPL/WM improved the fever. Analysis of MYD88 and the effect of chemotherapy on LPL/WM finally revealed the latent LPL/WM in this case.Entities:
Keywords: Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström's macroglobulinemia; myelodysplastic syndrome; myeloid differentiation primary response 88
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154721 PMCID: PMC8826126 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Case Rep ISSN: 2050-0904
FIGURE 1Serum protein electrophoresis and serum immunoelectrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. a, Serum electrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. A small M‐peak was seen (black arrow). b, Serum immunoelectrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. An M‐bow was observed in response to anti‐IgM antibody (white arrow), and anti‐κ antibody (white smaller arrow), indicating the presence of monoclonal IgM‐κM protein. An M‐bow was also observed in response to anti‐HWS serum (black arrow). N: normal serum; PS: patient's serum; HWS: human whole serum
FIGURE 2Bone marrow examination at repetitive fever onset (Aug 2, 2018). a, Bone marrow smear (Wright–Giemsa staining, ×1,000). MDS‐specific dysplasia including pseudo‐Pelger–Huët anomaly (A‐1, arrow) and micro‐megakaryocytes (A‐2, arrow) and abnormal lymphocytes (A‐3, arrow) were present. b, c, d, Flow cytometry at diagnosis of MDS (b, Dec. 15, 2016), before BDR therapy (c, Aug. 2, 2018) and after BDR therapy (d, Jan. 31, 2019). Flow cytometry revealed that 2.5% (B‐2 and B‐3, arrow) and 2.7% (C‐2 and C‐3, arrow) of nucleated cells were monoclonal B cells. FSC: forward scatter, SSC: side scatter
Laboratory data at diagnosis of MDS, on admission and after BDR therapy
| [Complete blood count] | [Serology Immunology] | [Bone marrow] | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec.15, 2016 |
Aug.2, 2018 |
Jan.31, 2019 |
Dec.15, 2016 |
Aug.2, 2018 |
Jan.31, 2019 |
Dec.15, 2016 |
Aug.2, 2018 |
Jan.31, 2019 | ||||||
| WBC | 3230 | 2720 | 2400 | /μl | CRP | 0.55 | 6.04 | 1.22 | mg/dl | Ncc | 9.2 | 18.6 | 14.5 | ×104/μl |
| Neut | 22.4 | 16.6 | 10.6 | % | IgG | 1025 | 786 | 339 | mg/dl | MegK | 38 | 6 | 25 | /μl |
| Lym | 44.7 | 12.7 | 60.7 | % | IgA | 204 | 147 | 50 | mg/dl | M‐bl | 4 | 3.6 | 2.2 | % |
| Mon | 32 | 69.3 | 27.3 | % | IgM | 951 | 1113 | 532 | mg/dl | Promyel | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 | % |
| Eos | 0.7 | 0 | 0.7 | % | sIL−2R | 899 | 1484 | 1460 | IU/ml | Myel | 14.4 | 22 | 18.4 | % |
| Bas | 2 | 0 | 0.7 | % | Β−2 MG | ‐ | 16.7 | 11.3 | mg/L | Metamyel | 23.3 | 21 | 22.9 | % |
| Atyp. Lym | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0 | % | WT1 mRNA | <50 | <50 | 120 | Copy/μg RNA | Stab | 20.7 | 18.8 | 19.2 | % |
| Hb | 8.4 | 6.5 | 8.9 | g/dl | [Chemistry] | Seg | 15.5 | 9 | 10.2 | % | ||||
| MCV | 118 | 108 | 122 | Mm3 | T‐Bil | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | mg/dl | Eos | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | % |
| Ret | 2.7 | 1 | 1.3 | ‰ | AST | 19 | 57 | 17 | IU/L | Bas | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | % |
| Plt | 14.9 | 22.2 | 12.1 | ×104/μl | ALT | 23 | 59 | 20 | IU/L | Lym | 9.9 | 12.8 | 12.6 | % |
| γ‐GTP | 67 | 109 | 135 | IU/L | Mon | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 | % | |||||
| LDH | 148 | 220 | 223 | IU/L | Plasma | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | % | |||||
| Alb | 3.7 | 3 | 3.7 | g/ml | Erythroid | 8.2 | 1.6 | 8.0 | % | |||||
| UA | 6 | 6.7 | 4.7 | mg/dl | M/E ratio | 9.18 | 45.75 | 9.33 | ||||||
| BUN | 19.7 | 34.5 | 21.8 | mg/dl | Atyp. lym | 0.2 | 3.2 | 1 | % | |||||
| Cre | 1.17 | 4.24 | 2.89 | mg/dl | Abnormal. Lym | 0.1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | % | |||||
FIGURE 3Analyses of MYD88L265P mutation using allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Genomic DNA from bone marrow mononuclear cells from the patient (lane 1) and those from patients negative and positive for MYD88L265P mutations (lanes 2–3) were analyzed at Tokyo Medical and Dental University using the allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The positions of the PCR products representing wild‐type MYD88 and MYD88L265P are illustrated
Lymphoma or IgM‐MGUS with high frequency of MYD88L265P mutation
| Disease | Frequency | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| LPL/WM | 91% (52/57) | Treon SP et al.(2012) |
| LPL/WM | 93% (97/104) | Xu L et al. (2013) |
| LPL/WM | 100% (58/58) | Varettoni M et al. (2013) |
| IgM‐MGUS | 10% (2/21) | Treon SP et al. (2012) |
| IgM‐MGUS | 54% (13/24) | Xu L et al. (2013) |
| IgM‐MGUS | 47% (36/77) | Varettoni M et al. (2013) |
| PCNSL | 72% (26/36) | Nayyar N et al. (2019) |
| Primary testicular lymphoma | 68% (25/37) | Kraan W et al. (2013) |
| DLBCL (ABC type) | 29% (13/45) | Ngo VN et al. (2011) |
FIGURE 4Clinical course of the patient. Bor, bortezomib; Dex, dexamethasone; RTX, rituximab