Literature DB >> 35154721

Successful treatment with bortezomib for refractory fever associated with myelodysplastic syndrome with underlying lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.

Yotaro Motomura1, Yoshihiro Umezawa2, Tomoyuki Arimatsu1, Keigo Okada1, Osamu Miura2, Takashi Kumagai1.   

Abstract

We report a case of fever of unknown origin in a patient with MDS associated with IgM-MGUS. The patient was positive for MYD88 mutation, and chemotherapy for LPL/WM improved the fever. Analysis of MYD88 and the effect of chemotherapy on LPL/WM finally revealed the latent LPL/WM in this case.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström's macroglobulinemia; myelodysplastic syndrome; myeloid differentiation primary response 88

Year:  2022        PMID: 35154721      PMCID: PMC8826126          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


INTRODUCTION

Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) experience fever caused by infection associated with febrile neutropenia and tumor fever due to progression to acute leukemia. Approximately 10%–30% of MDS cases have immune system disorders leading to fever. Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is a lymphoid malignancy with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy comprising minute monoclonal B cells, including mature B cells, differentiating into plasma cells. LPL with bone marrow invasion is defined as Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). In the 2008 World Health Organization classification, characteristic cytogenetic and chromosomal abnormalities for LPL/WM were unclear; in a 2003 study, however, ~90% of LPL/WM cases had L265P mutation in MYD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88). The rate of malignant cells in the bone marrow of patients with WM has not been clearly defined.  The pathological diagnosis for WM is occasionally difficult if the tumor burden is low in the bone marrow without extramedullary disease. We have encountered an MDS case with recurring fever of unknown origin. No evidence of infection, tumor fever, or immunological diseases was found via various examinations. Bone marrow aspiration was consistent with low‐risk MDS as observed at diagnosis. Monoclonal IgM was positive but at low levels, consistent with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). The positive MYD88L265P mutation and good response to LPL/WM‐targeted therapy were useful for diagnosing underlying LPL/WM, a rare complication of MDS.

CASE REPORT

A 55‐year‐old man was diagnosed with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma and achieved complete remission by chemotherapy. At the age of 60, he was diagnosed with left renal cell carcinoma and achieved remission by left kidney resection. In November of 2016, at the age of 73, the patient was hospitalized for pneumonia and determined to have anemia. During the same hospital stay, he was also diagnosed with treatment‐related MDS (also known as MDS with multilineage dysplasia; International Prognostic Scoring System: low risk) by bone marrow aspiration, and with IgM‐MGUS by serum protein electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis (Figure 1). His marrow cells contained clonal B cells (Figure 2B and Table 1).
FIGURE 1

Serum protein electrophoresis and serum immunoelectrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. a, Serum electrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. A small M‐peak was seen (black arrow). b, Serum immunoelectrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. An M‐bow was observed in response to anti‐IgM antibody (white arrow), and anti‐κ antibody (white smaller arrow), indicating the presence of monoclonal IgM‐κM protein. An M‐bow was also observed in response to anti‐HWS serum (black arrow). N: normal serum; PS: patient's serum; HWS: human whole serum

FIGURE 2

Bone marrow examination at repetitive fever onset (Aug 2, 2018). a, Bone marrow smear (Wright–Giemsa staining, ×1,000). MDS‐specific dysplasia including pseudo‐Pelger–Huët anomaly (A‐1, arrow) and micro‐megakaryocytes (A‐2, arrow) and abnormal lymphocytes (A‐3, arrow) were present. b, c, d, Flow cytometry at diagnosis of MDS (b, Dec. 15, 2016), before BDR therapy (c, Aug. 2, 2018) and after BDR therapy (d, Jan. 31, 2019). Flow cytometry revealed that 2.5% (B‐2 and B‐3, arrow) and 2.7% (C‐2 and C‐3, arrow) of nucleated cells were monoclonal B cells. FSC: forward scatter, SSC: side scatter

TABLE 1

Laboratory data at diagnosis of MDS, on admission and after BDR therapy

[Complete blood count][Serology Immunology][Bone marrow]

Dec.15,

2016

Aug.2,

2018

Jan.31,

2019

Dec.15,

2016

Aug.2,

2018

Jan.31,

2019

Dec.15,

2016

Aug.2,

2018

Jan.31,

2019

WBC323027202400/μlCRP0.556.041.22mg/dlNcc9.218.614.5×104/μl
Neut22.416.610.6%IgG1025786339mg/dlMegK38625/μl
Lym44.712.760.7%IgA20414750mg/dlM‐bl43.62.2%
Mon3269.327.3%IgM9511113532mg/dlPromyel1.12.11.1%
Eos0.700.7%sIL−2R89914841460IU/mlMyel14.42218.4%
Bas200.7%Β−2 MG16.711.3mg/LMetamyel23.32122.9%
Atyp. Lym0.41.30%WT1 mRNA<50<50120Copy/μg RNAStab20.718.819.2%
Hb8.46.58.9g/dl[Chemistry]Seg15.5910.2%
MCV118108122Mm3 T‐Bil0.30.30.4mg/dlEos0.10.30.4%
Ret2.711.3AST195717IU/LBas0.200.2%
Plt14.922.212.1×104/μlALT235920IU/LLym9.912.812.6%
γ‐GTP67109135IU/LMon1.92.11.8%
LDH148220223IU/LPlasma1.21.20.2%
Alb3.733.7g/mlErythroid8.21.68.0%
UA66.74.7mg/dlM/E ratio9.1845.759.33
BUN19.734.521.8mg/dlAtyp. lym0.23.21%
Cre1.174.242.89mg/dlAbnormal. Lym0.12.41.3%
Serum protein electrophoresis and serum immunoelectrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. a, Serum electrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. A small M‐peak was seen (black arrow). b, Serum immunoelectrophoresis at diagnosis of MDS and IgM‐MGUS. An M‐bow was observed in response to anti‐IgM antibody (white arrow), and anti‐κ antibody (white smaller arrow), indicating the presence of monoclonal IgM‐κM protein. An M‐bow was also observed in response to anti‐HWS serum (black arrow). N: normal serum; PS: patient's serum; HWS: human whole serum Bone marrow examination at repetitive fever onset (Aug 2, 2018). a, Bone marrow smear (Wright–Giemsa staining, ×1,000). MDS‐specific dysplasia including pseudo‐Pelger–Huët anomaly (A‐1, arrow) and micro‐megakaryocytes (A‐2, arrow) and abnormal lymphocytes (A‐3, arrow) were present. b, c, d, Flow cytometry at diagnosis of MDS (b, Dec. 15, 2016), before BDR therapy (c, Aug. 2, 2018) and after BDR therapy (d, Jan. 31, 2019). Flow cytometry revealed that 2.5% (B‐2 and B‐3, arrow) and 2.7% (C‐2 and C‐3, arrow) of nucleated cells were monoclonal B cells. FSC: forward scatter, SSC: side scatter Laboratory data at diagnosis of MDS, on admission and after BDR therapy Dec.15, 2016 Aug.2, 2018 Jan.31, 2019 Dec.15, 2016 Aug.2, 2018 Jan.31, 2019 Dec.15, 2016 Aug.2, 2018 Jan.31, 2019 In August of 2017, the patient experienced a transient fever of over 38°C. Because his white blood cell and neutrophil counts were 1,430 and 286/µl, respectively, the fever was considered febrile neutropenia. Renal dysfunction progressed because the patient had only one kidney (Table 1). No infections were detected by physical examination, various cultures, or fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET)/computed tomography (CT) or other imaging. Serum examinations for bacterial, fungal, and viral infections were nondiagnostic. Autoimmune antibodies, including antinuclear antibody, were negative. Beginning in February 2018, his fever began to repeat periodically. Antibiotics or low‐dose steroids were ineffective. Bone marrow aspiration/biopsy revealed hypercellular bone marrow with dysplasia, including pseudo‐Pelger–Huët anomaly and micro‐megakaryocytes, compatible with MDS (Figure 2A). Bone marrow aspiration also revealed that 2.4% of lymphocytes were abnormal (Table 1), and flow cytometry showed that 2.7% of nucleated cells were clonal B cells (k>>L) (Figure 2B). Allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for MYD88L265P using marrow cells was positive (Figure 3), , and no lymphadenopathy was observed on CT.
FIGURE 3

Analyses of MYD88L265P mutation using allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Genomic DNA from bone marrow mononuclear cells from the patient (lane 1) and those from patients negative and positive for MYD88L265P mutations (lanes 2–3) were analyzed at Tokyo Medical and Dental University using the allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The positions of the PCR products representing wild‐type MYD88 and MYD88L265P are illustrated

Analyses of MYD88L265P mutation using allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Genomic DNA from bone marrow mononuclear cells from the patient (lane 1) and those from patients negative and positive for MYD88L265P mutations (lanes 2–3) were analyzed at Tokyo Medical and Dental University using the allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The positions of the PCR products representing wild‐type MYD88 and MYD88L265P are illustrated Based on the history of IgM‐MGUS, monoclonal B cells in the bone marrow, and positive MYD88L265P mutation, we considered that the tumor fever was due to LPL/WM developed from MGUS as a differential diagnosis. Although MYD88 mutation has a high sensitivity for LPL/WM, its specificity is low. A search of the literature (Table 2) , , , , , revealed high MYD88‐positive rates in primary central nervous system lymphoma and testicular lymphoma. Therefore, other low‐grade B‐cell lymphomas could have the mutation. However, this case was clinically unlikely to be a primary central nervous system lymphoma, primary testicular lymphoma, or diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma based on PET/CT and repeat CT imaging studies.
TABLE 2

Lymphoma or IgM‐MGUS with high frequency of MYD88L265P mutation

DiseaseFrequencyReference
LPL/WM91% (52/57)Treon SP et al.(2012) 4
LPL/WM93% (97/104)Xu L et al. (2013) 5
LPL/WM100% (58/58)Varettoni M et al. (2013) 6
IgM‐MGUS10% (2/21)Treon SP et al. (2012) 4
IgM‐MGUS54% (13/24)Xu L et al. (2013) 5
IgM‐MGUS47% (36/77)Varettoni M et al. (2013) 6
PCNSL72% (26/36)Nayyar N et al. (2019) 7
Primary testicular lymphoma68% (25/37)Kraan W et al. (2013) 8
DLBCL (ABC type)29% (13/45)Ngo VN et al. (2011) 9
Lymphoma or IgM‐MGUS with high frequency of MYD88L265P mutation The MYD88‐positive rate is also high in IgM‐MGUS. We thus could not rule out IgM‐MGUS from LPL/WM. Therefore, in August of 2018, we administered bortezomib, dexamethasone, and rituximab (BDR) (bortezomib [1.3 mg]/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; dexamethasone [40 mg] /body on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 11 ) targeted for possible symptomatic LPL/WM. After four cycles of BDR, IgM M‐proteins decreased from 1113 mg/dl to 532 mg/dl (partial remission). The recurring fever over 38°C dramatically improved to a normal level. Flow cytometry showed that the clonal B cells that had been previously detected had almost completely disappeared (Figure 2B‐D). Also, the bone marrow aspiration showed that the number of abnormal lymphocytes was reduced to 1.3% (Table 1). BDR therapy was considered to have been successful (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4

Clinical course of the patient. Bor, bortezomib; Dex, dexamethasone; RTX, rituximab

Clinical course of the patient. Bor, bortezomib; Dex, dexamethasone; RTX, rituximab

DISCUSSION

In patients with MDS, infections, malignancies, or autoimmune diseases cause fever. In the patient in this case report, bone marrow examination with flow cytometry and chromosomal analysis did not reveal the diagnosis of LPL/WM. In our patient, it was important to determine the cause of the increase in serum monoclonal IgM, because it could have been derived from various B‐cell malignancies other than LPL/WM. For these reasons, MYD88 mutation analysis is useful for diagnosing LPL/WM. In our patient, the good response of the fever of unknown origin to BDR therapy confirmed the diagnosis. MYD88L265P mutation may be an early oncogenic event in LPL/WM, and MYD88L265P‐positive IgM‐MGUS cases are more likely to progress to LPL/WM than MYD88L265P‐negative ones.  Therefore, we should exercise caution regarding the malignant transformation of MYD88L265P‐positive IgM‐MGUS. In a study involving 40 patients with MDS, stem cells were shown to overexpress the MYD88 protein. However, MYD88L265P was not found in all cases was not found in any cases.  Therefore, MYD88L265P might be derived from LPL/WM but not MDS. The International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia provides the criteria for starting treatment for LPL/WM. In this case, the recurring fever and anemia met the criteria for LPL/WM treatment despite low IgM levels. Although the anemia might have been derived from MDS, it improved after four cycles of BDR therapy, suggesting that LPL/WM caused both fever and anemia Many rituximab‐containing regimens are effective for WM/LPL based on phase II trials. In this case, BDR was selectively administered because of the renal impairment (creatinine clearance rate: 18 ml/min/1.73 m2). The prevalence of MGUS in patients with MDS ranges between 2% and 10%. Moreover, in a study on 1,198 patients with MDS, 6 patients had complications of LPL.  This finding would suggest that MDS with associated IgM‐MGUS or LPL/WM is not especially rare. Clinicians should watch for symptomatic LPL/WM in their patients with MDS, as in the present patient, whose IgM level and rate of tumor cells were low. In this patient, MYD88 mutation analysis and BDR therapy played a significant role in diagnosing LPL/WM and informing the treatment strategy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Yotaro Motomura drafted the article and provided and cared for study patients. Yoshihiro Umezawa and Osamu Miura served as scientific advisors. Tomoyuki Arimatsu and Keigo Okada provided and cared for study patients. Takashi Kumagai critically revised the article for important intellectual content.

CONSENT

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinicopathological definition of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: consensus panel recommendations from the Second International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

Authors:  Roger G Owen; Steven P Treon; Ayad Al-Katib; Rafael Fonseca; Philip R Greipp; Mary L McMaster; Enrica Morra; Gerassimos A Pangalis; Jesus F San Miguel; Andrew R Branagan; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 2.  Treatment recommendations from the Eighth International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia.

Authors:  Véronique Leblond; Efstathios Kastritis; Ranjana Advani; Stephen M Ansell; Christian Buske; Jorge J Castillo; Ramón García-Sanz; Morie Gertz; Eva Kimby; Charalampia Kyriakou; Giampaolo Merlini; Monique C Minnema; Pierre Morel; Enrica Morra; Mathias Rummel; Ashutosh Wechalekar; Christopher J Patterson; Steven P Treon; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Incidence and characteristics of lymphoid malignancies in untreated myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  L Florensa; T Vallespí; S Woessner; A Domingo; N Crespo; M Rozman; J L Aguilar; D Irriguible; A Zarco; F Millá; E Feliu
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  1996-11

Review 4.  Autoimmune manifestations associated with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Eric Grignano; Vincent Jachiet; Pierre Fenaux; Lionel Ades; Olivier Fain; Arsène Mekinian
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.673

5.  MYD88 L265P in Waldenström macroglobulinemia, immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy, and other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders using conventional and quantitative allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Lian Xu; Zachary R Hunter; Guang Yang; Yangsheng Zhou; Yang Cao; Xia Liu; Enrica Morra; Alessandra Trojani; Antonino Greco; Luca Arcaini; Marzia Varettoni; Maria Varettoni; Jennifer R Brown; Yu-Tzu Tai; Kenneth C Anderson; Nikhil C Munshi; Christopher J Patterson; Robert J Manning; Christina K Tripsas; Neal I Lindeman; Steven P Treon
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prevalence and clinical significance of the MYD88 (L265P) somatic mutation in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and related lymphoid neoplasms.

Authors:  Marzia Varettoni; Luca Arcaini; Silvia Zibellini; Emanuela Boveri; Sara Rattotti; Roberta Riboni; Alessandro Corso; Ester Orlandi; Maurizio Bonfichi; Manuel Gotti; Cristiana Pascutto; Silvia Mangiacavalli; Giorgio Croci; Valeria Fiaccadori; Lucia Morello; Maria Luisa Guerrera; Marco Paulli; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Primary therapy of Waldenström macroglobulinemia with bortezomib, dexamethasone, and rituximab: WMCTG clinical trial 05-180.

Authors:  Steven P Treon; Leukothea Ioakimidis; Jacob D Soumerai; Christopher J Patterson; Patricia Sheehy; Marybeth Nelson; Michael Willen; Jeffrey Matous; John Mattern; Jakow G Diener; George P Keogh; Thomas J Myers; Andy Boral; Ann Birner; Dixie L Esseltine; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A novel MYD88 mutation, L265RPP, in Waldenström macroglobulinemia activates the NF-κB pathway to upregulate Bcl-xL expression and enhances cell survival.

Authors:  T Nagao; G Oshikawa; S Ishida; H Akiyama; Y Umezawa; A Nogami; T Kurosu; O Miura
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 11.037

9.  High prevalence of oncogenic MYD88 and CD79B mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas presenting at immune-privileged sites.

Authors:  W Kraan; H M Horlings; M van Keimpema; E J M Schilder-Tol; M E C M Oud; C Scheepstra; P M Kluin; M J Kersten; M Spaargaren; S T Pals
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  Overexpression of the toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling adaptor MYD88, but lack of genetic mutation, in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Sophie Dimicoli; Yue Wei; Carlos Bueso-Ramos; Hui Yang; Courtney Dinardo; Yu Jia; Hong Zheng; Zhihong Fang; Martin Nguyen; Sherry Pierce; Rui Chen; Hui Wang; Chenghua Wu; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.