| Literature DB >> 35154674 |
Tan Phat Dao1,2,3, Duc Ngoc Vu4, Duong Vu Nguyen3, Van Thinh Pham5, Thi Yen Nhi Tran1,2,3.
Abstract
Cashew apples, a by-product accrued during the manufacture of cashew nuts, have abundant nutritional values but are not widely utilized due to the presence of substances that cause acrid taste. In this study, we attempted the production of a dried jelly cashew apple product and optimized three main processing stages including blanching, osmotic, and drying. The results showed suitable conditions at 6 mm thickness in the blanching process. The osmotic process recorded a temperature of 35°C, within 1.5 h, the ratio of sugar syrup/ingredient 2:1 with sugar syrup 60 Bx, and the addition of 0.6% citric acid on the total weight of ingredients and 0.02% CaCl2. The drying process at 55°C within 267 min had the highest ascorbic acid content (TAA), total phenolic content (TPC), and content of tannin compounds (TTC) retention. These parameters refer to a product that has good organoleptic acceptability in terms of taste, acrid content, and a high ability to retain major nutrients. Furthermore, the product recovery efficiency is 21.45%. Jelly drying cashew apples (JDC) are formed to help take advantage of by-products, contributing to adding value for the cashew industry.Entities:
Keywords: blanching; cashew apples (Anacardium occidentale L.); drying; jelly; osmosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 35154674 PMCID: PMC8825725 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1Steps of technology to create JDC
FIGURE 2Total polyphenol content in the process of blanching at different sizes. Here, Original is the value of the initial material (raw material). (a–b) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < .05) between different slice thicknesses
FIGURE 3Ascorbic acid content during blanching at different sizes. Here, Original is the value of the initial material (raw material). (a–e) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < .05) between different slice thicknesses
FIGURE 4Total tannin content during blanching at different sizes. Here, Original is the value of the initial material (raw material). (a–e) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < .05) between different slice thicknesses
FIGURE 5Effect of temperature and time on TSS (Bx) during osmosis. (a–d) and (A–D) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < .05) between temperature and time at different points
FIGURE 6Effect of time and temperature on total polyphenol content during osmosis. Here, Original (O) is the value of the initial material (raw material). (a–d) and (A–D) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < .05) between temperature and time at different points
FIGURE 7Effect of temperature and time on ascorbic acid content during osmosis. Here, Original (O) is the value of the initial material (raw material). (a– d) and (A–D) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < .05) between temperature and time at different points
FIGURE 8Effect of temperature and time on total tannin content during osmosis. Here, Original (O) is the value of the initial material (raw material). (a–d) and (A– C) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < .05) between temperature and time at different points
Appearance values of cashew apple samples at different osmotic temperatures
| Osmosis | 35°C | 45°C | 55°C | 65°C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 h |
|
|
|
|
| Description | Acrid taste, little sweetness, light brown in color, strong smell, dried fruit flesh | Acrid taste, sweet, light color, not too harsh, strong smell, soft fruit flesh | Less acrid, strong sweetness, not too harsh light color, very soft flesh | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh, light color, very soft flesh |
| 1.5 h |
|
|
|
|
| Description | Less acrid, medium sweetness, not too harsh, light color, characteristic aroma, flexible fruit flesh | Less acrid, sweet, not too harsh, light color, soft flesh, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh, light color, very soft flesh, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh, very soft flesh, light color, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin |
| 2.0 h |
|
|
|
|
| Description | Less acrid, sweet, harsh, dark color, characteristic aroma | Less acrid, sweet, harsh, light color, soft flesh, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh, light color, very soft flesh, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh, very soft flesh, light color, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin |
| 2.5 h |
|
|
|
|
| Description | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh, dark color, characteristic aroma | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh light color, soft flesh, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin | Less acrid, strong sweetness, light color, very soft flesh, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin | Less acrid, strong sweetness, harsh, very soft flesh, light color, characteristic aroma, wrinkled outer skin |
FIGURE 9Effect of drying temperature on TAA, TPC, and TTC. Here, Original is the value of the initial material (raw material). (a–d) indicate a statistically significant difference in TAA (p < .05) between different drying temperatures. A, B, C means are dependent on TPC, TAA, and TTC columns, respectively
Product drying time at different temperatures
| Drying temperature (oC) | 55 | 60 | 65 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drying time (min) | 268.77 ± 17.35 | 207.67 ± 11.24 | 180.17 ± 9.11 |
Colors of products during drying at different temperatures
| Drying temperature (oC) | Image | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 |
| 77.46 ± 2.13 | −1.48 ± 1.38 | 38.64 ± 4.04 |
| 60 |
| 72.58 ± 0.76 | 2.70 ± 1.83 | 51.00 ± 6.05 |
| 65 |
| 69.52 ± 0.45 | 1.9 ± 0.788 | 47.37 ± 3.68 |