| Literature DB >> 35154672 |
Li Liu1, Pan Huang1, Wei Xie1, Jinlin Wang2, Yujin Li1, Haiyan Wang3, He Xu4, Fan Bai2, Xiaodong Zhou3, Ruichang Gao5, Yuanhui Zhao1.
Abstract
In this study, the influence of air-frying temperature on the physical properties of sturgeon steaks was explored. Meanwhile, the comparison of traditional deep fat frying (TF) and air fryer frying (AFF) methods on the quality, flavor, and digestibility of sturgeon steaks were investigated. The results indicated that along with the increase of temperature (130, 160, and 190℃) for 15 min, the moisture content of AFF sturgeon steak surface decreased dramatically while that of interior was well preserved. The applied texture property analysis exhibited that AFF sturgeon steak showed the enhanced elasticity, low hardness, and soft texture. The results indicated that AFF sturgeon steak contained higher essential amino acid content than TF sturgeon steak. More flavor compounds (aldehydes, alcohols, and esters) were produced after AFF than TF. Although the digestibility of fried sturgeon steaks decreased after frying, AFF sturgeon steaks were digested rapidly in the stomach and intestine. Conclusively, AFF sturgeon steaks exhibited a crispy texture, appealing flavor, and low oil content. This work provides a certain reference for the suitable frying methods in the processing industry of sturgeon products.Entities:
Keywords: air‐frying; digestibility; flavor; quality; sturgeon
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154672 PMCID: PMC8825730 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1Moisture content of the first three layers of air fryer frying (a) and traditional deep fat frying sturgeon steaks under different frying time and temperature
Effect of different frying methods on color indicators in sturgeon steak
| Frying method |
|
|
| ∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 72.93 ± 0.07a | 0.71 ± 0.11e | 2.76 ± 0.08e | 0 | |
| TF | 130℃ | 63.42 ± 0.08b | 2.25 ± 0.16c | 12.42 ± 0.03c | 13.64 ± 0.07d |
| 160℃ | 49.65 ± 0.14c | 12.33 ± 0.21b | 15.25 ± 0.16b | 28.86 ± 0.14b | |
| 190℃ | 43.51 ± 0.20d | 14.62 ± 0.15a | 21.51 ± 0.08a | 37.55 ± 0.16a | |
| AFF | 130℃ | 60.48 ± 0.18b | 1.17 ± 0.06d | 5.71 ± 0.13de | 12.78 ± 0.13d |
| 160℃ | 54.91 ± 0.12bc | 2.21 ± 0.08c | 7.68 ± 0.06d | 19.58 ± 0.10c | |
| 190℃ | 47.42 ± 0.13 cd | 2.94 ± 0.12c | 13.41 ± 0.14bc | 27.73 ± 0.22b |
Superscript letters on the same column show the significant difference between the treatments (p < .05).
Data are expressed as means ± SD.
Texture profile analysis of sturgeon steak in different frying methods
| Method | Hardness ( | Elasticity (mm) | Chewability (mJ) | Adhesion (mJ) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 3.62 ± 0.09d | 7.46 ± 0.22d | 17.0 ± 0.25e | 1.35 ± 0.06d | |
| TF | 130℃ | 8.66 ± 0.08bc | 13.42 ± 0.21b | 44.36 ± 0.14c | 6.17 ± 0.11c |
| 160℃ | 9.13 ± 0.10b | 14.31 ± 0.18a | 53.41 ± 0.38b | 6.43 ± 0.15bc | |
| 190℃ | 12.01 ± 0.05a | 13.63 ± 0.08b | 61.37 ± 0.16a | 8.23 ± 0.23a | |
| AFF | 130℃ | 6.31 ± 0.17a | 9.25 ± 0.23c | 37.62 ± 0.33d | 4.25 ± 0.21ab |
| 160℃ | 8.15 ± 0.06c | 8.92 ± 0.06 cd | 42.13 ± 0.21c | 6.63 ± 0.08b | |
| 190℃ | 10.42 ± 0.12ab | 7.81 ± 0.14d | 50.45 ± 0.18b | 7.15 ± 0.14ab |
Different letters in each column indicate significant differences between groups (p <.05).
Abbreviations: AFF, air fryer frying; TF, traditional deep fat frying.
FIGURE 2Electron micrograph of Raw (A, a), traditional deep fat frying (B, b), and air fryer frying (C, c) sturgeon steaks on the transverse (A, B, C) and vertical section (a, b, c) (500× magnification)
Amino acid composition of sturgeon steak in different frying methods (g/100 g)
| Amino acid | Raw | TF | AFF |
|---|---|---|---|
| His | 0.59 ± 0.04b | 0.91 ± 0.02a | 0.95 ± 0.06a |
| Ile | 0.73 ± 0.12b | 1.24 ± 0.06a | 1.27 ± 0.08a |
| Leu | 1.3 ± 0.63b | 2.3 ± 0.84a | 2.18 ± 0.27a |
| Lys | 1.57 ± 0.42c | 2.57 ± 0.81b | 2.81 ± 0.36a |
| Met | 0.10 ± 0.04b | 0.16 ± 0.06b | 0.32 ± 0.01a |
| Phe | 0.67 ± 0.06b | 1.11 ± 0.04a | 1.16 ± 0.13a |
| Thr | 0.65 ± 0.08b | 1.15 ± 0.05a | 1.27 ± 0.20a |
| Val | 0.74 ± 0.15c | 1.27 ± 0.63b | 1.43 ± 0.38a |
| ∑EAA | 6.35 ± 1.53b | 10.71 ± 2.02a | 11.39 ± 1.45a |
| Asp | 1.68 ± 0.46b | 2.71 ± 0.83a | 2.8 ± 0.62a |
| Ser | 0.70 ± 0.08b | 1.22 ± 0.15a | 1.22 ± 0.06a |
| Gln | 2.77 ± 0.72b | 4.75 ± 0.64a | 4.85 ± 0.57a |
| Gly | 0.74 ± 0.10b | 1.56 ± 0.08a | 1.52 ± 0.05a |
| Ala | 0.92 ± 0.21b | 1.73 ± 0.17a | 1.75 ± 0.12a |
| Cys | 0.22 ± 0.03c | 0.43 ± 0.06b | 0.67 ± 0.05a |
| Tyr | 0.54 ± 0.06c | 0.87 ± 0.05b | 0.96 ± 0.08a |
| Arg | 0.98 ± 0.08b | 1.74 ± 0.06a | 1.85 ± 0.06a |
| Pro | 0.52 ± 0.04b | 1.12 ± 0.06a | 1.02 ± 0.02a |
| TAA | 15.42 ± 2.82c | 26.84 ± 1.93b | 28.03 ± 2.45a |
| ∑EAA/TAA (%) | 41.18 ± 2.92a | 39.90 ± 1.83a | 40.64 ± 2.07a |
Superscript letters on the same column show the significant difference between the treatments (p < .05).
EAA and TAA represent essential amino acids and total amino acids, respectively.
Abbreviations: AFF, air fryer frying; TF, traditional deep fat frying.
Essential amino acids score (EAAS) of sturgeon steak in different frying methods (mg/g protein)
| Essential amino acids | FAO | Raw | TF | AFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ile | 40 | 38.40 | 61.25 | 60.43 |
| Leu | 70 | 39.07 | 64.92 | 59.27 |
| Lys | 55 | 60.06 | 92.33 | 97.24 |
| Met + Cys | 35 | 72.74 | 111.78 | 115.29 |
| Phe + Tyr | 60 | 11.22 | 19.43 | 31.40 |
| Thr | 40 | 34.19 | 56.81 | 60.43 |
| Val | 50 | 31.14 | 50.19 | 54.43 |
Abbreviations: AFF, air fryer frying; TF, traditional deep fat frying.
FIGURE 3Fatty acid content by unsaturation (a) and total n‐3 fatty acids (the sum of ALA, EPA, and DHA) of different fried sturgeon steaks (b). SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; Abbreviations: ALA, alpha linolenic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid
FIGURE 4The hierarchical cluster heatmap of volatile components in different fried sturgeon steaks
The volatile components and relative contents of sturgeon steak in different frying methods
| Raw | TF | AFF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aldehydes | |||
| 2,3‐dimethyl‐pentanal | 1.72 | nd | nd |
| Benzaldehyde | 8.68 | nd | 3.44 |
| 3‐hydroxy‐4‐methoxybenzaldehyde | 5.38 | nd | nd |
| Pentanal | 1.46 | 0.37 | 2.99 |
| Hexanal | 5.49 | 5.06 | 11.51 |
| Tetradecanal | 0.38 | nd | 1.12 |
| 2‐methyl‐butanal | nd | 0.38 | 1.72 |
| 2‐methyl‐propanal | nd | nd | 1.03 |
| 3‐methyl‐butanal | nd | nd | 2.28 |
| Octanal | nd | nd | 0.71 |
| 3‐hydroxy‐4‐methoxybenzaldehyde | nd | nd | 3.25 |
| Ketones | |||
| Acetone | 0.25 | nd | nd |
| 2,3‐butanedione | 0.23 | nd | nd |
| 2,3‐pentanedione | 0.72 | nd | nd |
| 3‐hydroxy‐2‐butanone | 1.02 | nd | nd |
| 2‐butanone | nd | 0.21 | 0.39 |
| 2‐heptanone | nd | nd | 3.64 |
| Alcohols | |||
| 3‐methy‐1‐butanol | 6.01 | 0.66 | 6.88 |
| 1‐penten‐3‐ol | 1.35 | 1.31 | 0.57 |
| 1‐propen‐2‐ol | nd | 1.35 | 1.47 |
| 2‐penten‐1‐ol | 0.46 | nd | nd |
| 2‐ethyl‐1‐hexanol | 2.91 | 1.85 | 1.81 |
| 1‐pctanol | 0.42 | nd | 0.76 |
| Ethanol | 0.59 | nd | nd |
| 1‐octen‐3‐ol | nd | nd | 3.50 |
| Benzyl alcohol | nd | nd | 0.63 |
| Hydrocarbons | |||
| 1,1‐diethoxy‐ethane | 2.80 | nd | nd |
| Trichloromethane | 1.13 | nd | 4.80 |
| 3,5,5‐trimethyl‐2‐hexene | 0.72 | nd | nd |
| Cyclopropene | 0.54 | nd | nd |
| Pentadecane | 0.51 | 0.46 | 4.42 |
| Octane | nd | 0.74 | nd |
| 6‐methyl‐undecane | nd | 1.55 | nd |
| Propane | nd | 0.74 | nd |
| Undecane | nd | 3.20 | 2.36 |
| 3,5‐octadiyne | nd | 2.21 | nd |
| Hexadecane | nd | 1.04 | nd |
| Dodecane | nd | 13.18 | 4.96 |
| 2‐Hexene | nd | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| 3‐butyl‐2,4‐pentanedione | nd | 0.50 | 0.59 |
| Butylated bydroxytoluene | nd | 0.51 | nd |
| 1R‐alpha‐pinene | nd | 0.91 | 1.19 |
| Acids | |||
|
| 0.36 | 1.80 | 1.93 |
| Malonic acid | 5.34 | nd | 2.89 |
| Acetic acid | 0.86 | 0.60 | 0.55 |
| Diethyl‐acetic acid | 1.28 | nd | 0.95 |
| 4‐hydroxy‐butanoic acid | 3.02 | nd | 0.81 |
| Propanoic acid | 15.22 | 0.85 | 1.13 |
| Hexanoic acid | 0.90 | nd | 2.28 |
| 1,2‐Benzenedicarboxylic acid | 0.57 | nd | nd |
| Malonic acid | nd | 12.83 | nd |
| 4‐hydroxy‐butanoic acid | nd | 0.34 | nd |
| Nonanoic acid | nd | 0.17 | 0.20 |
| Esters | |||
| Acetic acid, butyl ester | 5.33 | 0.32 | 3.48 |
| Tetraethyl silicate | 3.01 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Formic acid, hexyl ester | 0.69 | 0.13 | 0.61 |
| Tributyl phosphate | 3.37 | nd | nd |
| Diethyl phthalate | 3.13 | 0.69 | 1.30 |
| Dibutyl phthalate | 0.63 | nd | nd |
| 2‐propanoic acid, 2‐ methyl ester | 0.34 | nd | nd |
| Propanetriyl ester | 2.00 | nd | 2.09 |
| Ethyl acetate | nd | 0.55 | nd |
| Methoxyacetic acid, benzyl ester | nd | 2.88 | 3.71 |
| Propanetriyl ester | 0.23 | 0.42 | 2.09 |
| Aromatics | |||
| Toluene | 1.01 | 1.98 | 1.03 |
| Ethylbenzene | 8.02 | 16.82 | 3.95 |
| 1,3‐dimethyl‐benzene | 1.93 | 18.35 | nd |
| 1,3,5‐trimethyl‐benzene | nd | 0.20 | nd |
| 1,2‐dichloro‐3‐methyl‐benzene | nd | 2.95 | 2.65 |
| Others | |||
| Pyrazine | nd | 1.04 | 0.66 |
Abbreviations: AFF, air fryer frying; TF, traditional deep fat frying.
FIGURE 5Digestive product absorbance of different fried sturgeon steaks at 280 nm treated by gastric pepsin (a) and pancreatic trypsin + α‐chymotrypsin (b) and in vitro digestibility (c)