| Literature DB >> 35154671 |
Yafei Wang1, Xufeng Wang1, Chuntong Lin1, Mengqin Yu1, Shanshan Chen1, Jingke Guo1, Pingfan Rao2, Song Miao1,3, Shutao Liu1.
Abstract
In order to elucidate the substantial effect and underlying mechanism of endogenous collagen on the texture development of fish balls, the structural and gelling properties of eel muscle collagen (EMC) under different heat treatments, as well as their effects on texture of eel ball, were investigated. EMC resulted in significant improvement of eel ball texture via gelling ability, filler effect, and interaction with starch. Under mild heating below 90°C for 30 min, the structural and physicochemical changes of EMC varied gradually, resulting in improved storage modulus of starch-containing myofibrillar gel, a mimic of eel ball. However, overheating (100°C, 30 min) induced EMC degradation and significantly decreased the gel formation and the improvements in textural properties. Supplementation of EMC to eel balls significantly improved its gel strength, springiness, cohesiveness, and chewiness, as well as uniformity and tightness of the microstructure. These results suggest the texture development of eel ball can be regulated by heat-induced structural changes, as well as structure-function relationship of collagen, compared with previous studies on myofibrillar proteins and exogenous gelatin; and they may provide texture-related insights to the quality control of fish balls and diverse heat-treated products of surimi containing collagen.Entities:
Keywords: collagen; fish ball; heating; structure; texture
Year: 2021 PMID: 35154671 PMCID: PMC8825713 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1Heat‐induced structural changes of EMC. (a) DSC thermogram of EMC; (b) CD spectra of EMC; and (c) FTIR spectra of EMC
The assignment indication of peaks identified from Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra
| Region | Wavenumber(cm−1) | Assignment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25°C | 40°C | 60°C | 90°C | ||
| Amide A | 3,414 ± 1c | 3,458 ± 3b | 3,458 ± 1b | 3,464 ± 2a | N‐H stretch couple with H‐bond, O‐H stretch |
| Amide B | 2,928 ± 2a | 2,929 ± 2a | 2,926 ± 10a | 2,928 ± 0a | CH3 asymmetrical vibration |
| Amide I | 1,653 ± 1a | 1,643 ± 0b | 1,645 ± 2b | 1,645 ± 0b | C=O stretch, COO‐stretch |
| Amide II | 1,549 ± 2a | 1,549 ± 0a | 1,543 ± 3b | 1,545 ± 1b | NH bend coupled with CN stretch |
| 1,454 ± 0b | 1,458 ± 1a | 1,456 ± 0a | 1,458 ± 1a | CH2 deformation | |
| 1,400 ± 1b | 1,402 ± 0b | 1,404 ± 1a | 1,404 ± 0a | COO‐symmetrical stretch | |
| 1,335 ± 3b | 1,348 ± 1a | 1,338 ± 4b | 1,350 ± 2a | CH2 wag of proline and glycine; CO stretching in COO‐ | |
| Amide III | 1,240 ± 2b | 1,248 ± 3a | 1,246 ± 2a | 1,250 ± 1a | NH stretch coupled with CN stretch |
| 1,190 ± 0a | 1,182 ± 2b | 1,184 ± 2b | 1,184 ± 2b | C‐O stretching | |
| Fingerprint | 1,078 ± 5b | 1,117 ± 4a | 1,115 ± 5a | 1,117 ± 3a | C‐O stretch |
| 889 ± 6a | 866 ± 5c | 866 ± 3c | 879 ± 3b | C‐H deformation of mannuronic acid | |
| 613 ± 2b | 619 ± 2a | 619 ± 1a | 619 ± 2a | Guluronic acid residue | |
Within each row, means with different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < .05) among different groups.
The assignment of peaks was performed according to reports from Sow et al. (2019).
FIGURE 2Physicochemical properties of EMC. (a) Protein surface hydrophobicity of EMC; (b) hot‐water solubility of EMC at different temperatures; (c) SDS‐PAGE electropherogram of the dissolved fraction; and (d) diameter distribution profiles of EMC treated at different temperatures. Columns with different lower case letters indicate significant differences, as assessed by the LSD test (p < .05)
FIGURE 3Effect of heating temperature on the rheological behavior (a–c) and performance (d) of EMC gels. (a) The mechanical moduli (G' and G") and temperature as a function of time in the gelling process of EMC heated at 100°C; (b) frequency sweep of the EMC gels heated at different temperatures; (c) the large deformation of the EMC gels heated at different temperatures. (d) Effect of heating temperature on the performance of EMC gels
Effect of heating temperature on EMC gel properties
| Parameters | 40°C | 60°C | 90°C | 100°C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final G' (Pa) | 592.66 ± 20.49a | 386.97 ± 17.63b | 295.28 ± 8.47b | 113.31 ± 7.58c |
| Final G" (Pa) | 17.49 ± 3.25a | 13.72 ± 4.45a | 9.13 ± 1.25b | 6.42 ± 2.16c |
| T gel (°C) | 21.21 ± 3.02a | 24.98 ± 2.74b | 12.53 ± 1.34c | 5.27 ± 0.76d |
| Breaking force (Pa) | 1,013.66 ± 48.39a | 594.16 ± 27.56b | 557.90 ± 32.43b | 134.51 ± 18.89c |
| Corresponding strains (%) | 184.3 ± 5.3a | 153.0 ± 3.7b | 153.3 ± 2.8b | 126.5 ± 4.2c |
Values represent means of three experiments, and the different lower case letters (a–d) indicate significant differences in the same row as assessed by an LSD test (p < .05).
FIGURE 4Effects of EMC on the dynamic rheological properties of a mimic of eel ball and the microstructure of eel ball. Storage modulus (G') (a) and final G' (b) of the starch‐containing myofibril gel supplemented with EMCs preheated at different temperatures. Columns with different lower case letters indicate significant differences in LSD test results (p < .05); Masson image (×400) of eel ball without (c) or with (d) the addition of 0.5% EMC
Results of texture analysis of eel ball supplemented with collagen or collagenase
| Samples | Gel strength (g) | Springiness | Cohesiveness | Chewiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eel ball control | 411.19 ± 1.00c | 0.79 ± 0.01b | 0.56 ± 0.01b | 540.20 ± 14.72b |
| With 0.25% EMC | 440.06 ± 0.87b | 0.81 ± 0.00a | 0.64 ± 0.02a | 574.83 ± 11.54b |
| With 0.50% EMC | 485.66 ± 4.13a | 0.83 ± 0.00a | 0.63 ± 0.02a | 772.20 ± 41.65a |
| With Collagenase | 382.00 ± 2.87d | 0.74 ± 0.01c | 0.48 ± 0.03c | 301.91 ± 20.58c |
EMC‐Eel muscle collagen. Values represent means of three experiments, and the different lower case letters (a–d) indicate significant differences in the same row based on LSD test (p < .05).
FIGURE 5Schematic illustration of the relationship of heat‐induced structural changes in eel muscle collagen (EMC) with texture development in eel balls. In the microstructure of eel ball, myofibril (red) and collagen (blue) together constituted the network structure of eel ball, with starch granules filled within the network (white parts). EMC, with gentle heat treatment, can improve the microstructure of eel balls via gelling ability, filler effect, and interaction with starch; however, overheating may weaken this improvement because overheat‐induced degradation of EMC decreases its gelling ability significantly