| Literature DB >> 35154376 |
Abstract
Aerobic is loved by the public, especially the young people, through the combination of the art and power of dance. With people's attention to health, the demand for aerobic professionals is increasing. As an important training base for aerobic professionals, the level and teaching ability of aerobic professionals have a great influence on students. The gradual maturity and rapid popularization of artificial intelligence bring many opportunities and challenges to the teaching of physical education in colleges and universities. Only by seizing the opportunities and facing the challenges, excavating their own existing problems, and transforming with the help of artificial intelligence can we adapt to the development trend of educational modernization in China. In order to increase the standardization and standardization of aerobics and provide executable standards for aerobic learning, performance, and adjudication, through the research on the training strategy of aerobic sports talents under the background of artificial intelligence era, capture aerobic performance actions with artificial intelligence awareness, standardize and standardize aerobics, and discuss the teaching effect of school intelligent aerobics, it is found that this study not only has important physical education teaching value but also relates to the application prospect of artificial intelligence technology in aerobic physical education talent training strategy.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154376 PMCID: PMC8831043 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1102760
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.781
Figure 1Overall algorithm architecture.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of extraction algorithm architecture.
Statistics of students' aerobic performance (the data comes from the student files of the student office of our university).
| Grouping | Artificial intelligence | Manual scoring | Opinions of the employer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction | First semester | Second semester | |||
| 2019 | 7.93 ± 0.85 | 8.32 ± 0.797 | 7.85 ± 0.76 | 8.23 ± 0.78 | 8.39 ± 0.81 |
| 2020 | 7.36 ± 0.78 | 8.39 ± 0.87 | 8.56 ± 0.83 | 9.14 ± 0.89 | 9.56 ± 0.87 |
|
| 4.85 | 66.14 | 5.23 | 5.78 | 6.18 |
|
| 0.006 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
Artificial intelligence: the crystallization of human wisdom through computer program technology; manual scoring: professionals judge the score with naked eyes through professional knowledge; entry: after being approved by the employing unit, the job seeker can enter the employing unit to start the probation process after being notified by the recruiting unit; first semester: the first semester after the beginning of school; second semester: the second semester after the beginning of school; t, P comes from the bivariate t check.
Figure 3Comparison chart of students' aerobic performance and employers' opinions.
Statistics of student aerobic referee scores (the data comes from the student files of the student office of our university).
| Grouping | Artificial intelligence | Manual scoring | Opinions of the employer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction | First semester | Second semester | |||
| 2019 | 7.79 ± 0.81 | 8.16 ± 0.75 | 7.95 ± 0.87 | 8.33 ± 0.74 | 8.67 ± 0.91 |
| 2020 | 7.23 ± 0.67 | 8.21 ± 0.85 | 8.48 ± 0.76 | 9.14 ± 0.89 | 9.43 ± 0.84 |
|
| 5.26 | 59.78 | 6.01 | 5.93 | 6.34 |
|
| 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.008 |
Artificial intelligence: the crystallization of human wisdom through computer program technology; manual scoring: professionals judge the score with naked eyes through professional knowledge; entry: after being approved by the employing unit, the job seeker can enter the employing unit to start the probation process after being notified by the recruiting unit; first semester: the first semester after the beginning of school; second semester: the second semester after the beginning of school; t, P comes from the bivariate t check.
Figure 4Comparison of student aerobic referee scores and opinions of employers.
Statistics of students' aerobic teaching scores (the data comes from the student files of the student office of our university).
| Grouping | Artificial intelligence | Manual scoring | Opinions of the employer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction | First semester | Second semester | |||
| 2019 | 7.69 ± 065 | 8.23 ± 0.57 | 7.88 ± 0.82 | 8.45 ± 0.76 | 8.69 ± 0.79 |
| 2020 | 7.01 ± 0.74 | 8.35 ± 0.82 | 8.62 ± 0.92 | 9.19 ± 0.87 | 9.58 ± 0.93 |
|
| 4.86 | 62.17 | 5.24 | 6.03 | 6.42 |
|
| 0.006 | 0.017 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
Artificial intelligence: the crystallization of human wisdom through computer program technology; manual scoring: professionals judge the score with naked eyes through professional knowledge; entry: after being approved by the employing unit, the job seeker can enter the employing unit to start the probation process after being notified by the recruiting unit; first semester: the first semester after the beginning of school; second semester: the second semester after the beginning of school; t, P comes from the bivariate t check.
Figure 5Comparison of students' aerobic teaching results and employers' opinions.