| Literature DB >> 35154375 |
Maide Bucolo1,2, Gea Bucolo3, Arturo Buscarino1,2, Agata Fiumara4, Luigi Fortuna1,2, Salvina Gagliano1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This review explores state-of-the-art teleoperated robots for medical ultrasound scan procedures, providing a comprehensive look including the recent trends arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154375 PMCID: PMC8832154 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1072642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.781
Figure 1(a) Google results obtained for metatechnological areas. (b) Google results for metatechnological areas related to medicine.
Figure 2Relevance of each item within the total number of Scopus results related to remote ultrasound scan systems.
Figure 3Temporal trends of Scopus results published between 2011 and 2021 using the proposed classification.
Comparison of different complete systems for tele-operated ultrasound scan procedures.
| Reference | Main features | Limitations | Clinical/medical applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tang et al. [ | Coordination of heterogeneous master-slave structure | Delays not included in the control law | General applications |
| Masuda et al. [ | Wireless tele-echography | Specialized personnel needed to place the robot | General applications |
| Krebs et al. [ | Therapy optimization | Specific rehabilitation task | Stroke rehabilitation |
| Gourdon et al. [ | High-precision slave system with pneumatic artificial muscles | Limited speed | General applications |
| Salcudean et al. [ | Ergonomic interfaces | Lack of 3D image reconstruction | Carotid artery |
| Mathiasen et al. [ | Force, haptic, and position control; high real-time performance | Preliminary user interface | General applications |
| Vilchis et al. [ | Light-weight autonomous robot | Lack of force feedback | Abdomen |
| Fjellin et al. [ | Haptic feedback | No in vivo testing | General applications |
| Arbeille et al. [ | Good real-time performance over slower teleconnections | Longer examination sessions | Fetal analysis |
| Bruyere et al. [ | Reliable remote operations | Discomfortable setup for the operator | Renal biopsy |
| Huang et al. [ | Imitation learning of clinical procedures | Environment scanning performed off-line | Carotid artery |
Comparison of different control strategies.
| Reference | Control features | Limitations | Clinical/medical applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chatelain et al. [ | Confidence-drive position control | Simplified ultrasound propagation model | General applications |
| Skerl et al. [ | Pressure control | High weight | Abdomen |
| Kim et al. [ | Force feedback | Limited force | Thyroid |
| Abolhassani et al. [ | Trajectory planning | Slow velocity | Prostate therapy |
| Li et al. [ | Trajectory planning | Lack of in vivo testing | Lumbar puncture |
| Böttger et al. [ | Dexterity and kinematics | Simulations only | Microcirculation |
| Filippeschi et al. [ | User interface including navigation | Remote conditions simulated only | Abdomen |
| Sénac et al. [ | Review of pneumatic actuators control | No in vivo testing | Neonatal procedures |
| Gilbertson et al. [ | Force and position control | Soft tissues | Muscular systems |
| Kaminski et al. [ | Force feedback | Feasibility study | Thyroid diseases |
| Bucolo et al. [ | Force feedback | Prototype only | Abdomen |
| Hadjikov et al. [ | Model-based control | Simulations only | Abdominal fascia |
Comparison of mechanical characterization of methods for tissues.
| Paper | Main features | Limitations | Clinical/medical applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haddadi et al. [ | Improved tissue characterization robustness | Performance decrease at higher robot speed | Artery calcifications |
| Avazmohammadi et al. [ | Complete gallery of heart tissue models | Limited analysis of pathological conditions | Myocardium analysis |
| Dewi et al. [ | Comparative analysis of heart tissue models | Limited technological aspects | Heart tissue |
| Zhang et al. [ | Phantoms based on innovative materials | Midplane detection needed | Abdomen |
| Wen et al. [ | Calibration procedure based on tissue identification | Bad conditioning | General applications |
| Cairone et al. [ | Detection of microcirculation anomalies | Abstract modeling | Microcirculation |
Comparison of vision and image processing solutions.
| Paper | Main features | Limitations | Clinical/medical applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nakadate et al. [ | Reducing fatigue of sonographers and patients | No user interface; lack of object detection algorithms | Abdomen diseases |
| Colchester et al. [ | 3D tissue reconstruction | Reduced precision for subsurface structures | Vascular system |
| Geng et al. [ | Increase of patient safety | Low real-time performance | General applications |
| Gonçalves et al. [ | 3D bone reconstruction | Limited accuracy and speed | Orthopaedic surgery |
| Nair et al. [ | 3D feature extraction from raw data | Tested on simplified phantoms | Cysts detection |
| Igarashi et al. [ | Detection and tracking of kidneys | Limited detection performance | Tumor lesions tracking |
| Al-Badri et al. [ | Real-time remote visualization | Not tested on medical robots | General applications |
| Pagoulatos et al. [ | Enhanced calibration for probe position tracking | Need of tissue characteristics knowledge | General applications |
| Ackerman et al. [ | On-line self-adaptive calibration | Single calibration method | General applications |
| Housden et al. [ | Improved safety features | Probes motion control based on inverse kinematic only | Fetal imaging |
| Unger et al. [ | Standardized anatomical structures reconstruction | Higher performance with slower movements | Fibroids and prostate cancer |
| Moon et al. [ | Standardized fusion imaging | Tested on phantoms | Prostate biopsy |
| Pianykh et al. [ | Standardized AI algorithm implementations | Review of existing solutions | General applications |