| Literature DB >> 35154357 |
Yi Liu1.
Abstract
Memory alloy patella claws for treating patella fractures have been used for more than 30 years with many desirable features including fast healing, quick recovery, and avoidance of top abrasion of Kirschner wires and other complications. However, there are many models and it is difficult to choose the accurate claw for the patient. In this study, a finite element model of the butterfly-shaped patellar claw made of shape memory alloy was established, its mechanical structure was analyzed, and its clinical application was monitored. We used Solidworks Simulation software for modeling and mainly analyzed the force of the compression ring of the butterfly-shaped patellar claw. Clinically, we chose a closed fresh patella fracture case. After finite element analysis, the maximum stress that the compression ring of the butterfly-shaped patellar claw can withstand is 568.1 MPa. In this range, it always has elastic deformation resistance. The butterfly-shaped patella claw is fixed on the patella and will not break when subjected to a maximum force of 150 N on the encircling arm, and at the same time, there will be no pressure failure due to plastic deformation. A total of 27 cases were clinically used for the assessment of the clinical efficacy of the newly designed butterfly-shaped patella claws. The average follow-up time was 15.5 months, and the average fracture healing time was 8-12 weeks. All patients can get out of bed with crutches within 2 to 3 days after surgery. Among them, there were 15 cases with excellent functional ratings, 10 cases with good ratings, 2 cases with acceptable ratings, and no cases with poor ratings. The designed butterfly-shaped patella claws can provide an effective method for the treatment of patella fractures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154357 PMCID: PMC8831069 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2008668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1The butterfly-shaped patellar claw.
Figure 2Optimization model.
Figure 3Material settings.
Figure 4Constraint degree of freedom.
The force parameters of the patella at different knee flexion angles.
| Force parameter | Knee bend angle (°) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 60 | 90 | |
| Quadriceps tension | 120.36 | 116.16 | 135.09 |
| Patellar ligament tension | 129.77 | 93.19 | 54.03 |
| Patella joint force |
| ||
| Patellofemoral joint contact surface area | 450.50 | 596.26 | 701.06 |
| The ratio of patella joint force to body weight | 0.086 | 0.145 | 0.204 |
Figure 5Set initial normal force.
Figure 6Initial meshing.
Figure 7Local mesh control.
Figure 8Solution process.
Figure 9Mises stress results.
Figure 10Deformation displacement map.
Figure 11Strain result.
Figure 12Maximum force value of Mises stress.
Commonly used mechanical properties of nickel-titanium alloys.
| Performance | Test results |
|---|---|
| Elastic modulus | Mother phase: 83GPa |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33 |
| Yield strength | Mother phase: 195-690 MPa |
| Breaking strength | Fully annealed state: 895 MPa |
| Elongation at break | Fully annealed state: 25%-50% |
| Stress concentration factor | 8.5 |
| Shape memory recovery rate | 98% |
| Maximum recoverable strain | 7.3% |
| Resilience | 436.5 MPa |
| Fatigue life | 1.4 × 107 times |
| Nonlinear hyperelasticity | 8.1% |
| Linear hyperelastic strain phase | 4.3% |
| Damping performance (tan | 0.03 (completely austenite) |