| Literature DB >> 35154182 |
Yucheng Zheng1, Qingcai Hu1, Yun Yang1, Zongjie Wu1, Liangyu Wu1, Pengjie Wang1,2, Huili Deng1, Naixing Ye1, Yun Sun1.
Abstract
Understanding extensive transcriptional reprogramming events mediated by wounding during the oolong tea manufacturing process is essential for improving oolong tea quality. To improve our comprehension of the architecture of the wounding-induced gene regulatory network, we systematically analyzed the high-resolution transcriptomic and metabolomic data from wounding-treated (after turnover stage) tea leaves at 11 time points over a 220-min period. The results indicated that wounding activates a burst of transcriptional activity within 10 min and that the temporal expression patterns over time could be partitioned into 18 specific clusters with distinct biological processes. The transcription factor (TF) activity linked to the TF binding motif participated in specific biological processes within different clusters. A chronological model of the wounding-induced gene regulatory network provides insight into the dynamic transcriptional regulation event after wounding treatment (the turnover stage). Time series data of wounding-induced volatiles reveal the scientific significance of resting for a while after wounding treatment during the actual manufacturing process of oolong tea. Integrating information-rich expression data with information on volatiles allowed us to identify many high-confidence TFs participating in aroma formation regulation after wounding treatment by using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Collectively, our research revealed the complexity of the wounding-induced gene regulatory network and described wounding-mediated dynamic transcriptional reprogramming events, serving as a valuable theoretical basis for the quality formation of oolong tea during the post-harvest manufacturing process.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-seq; oolong tea; transcriptional reprogramming events; volatile; wounding treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154182 PMCID: PMC8829136 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.788469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Overview of a time course of metabolome and transcriptome data. (A) RNA-seq score plot of a principal component analysis (PCA). The size of the yellow circle represents their contribution values to the principal components. (B) KEGG enrichment analysis of the top 1000 genes in PC 1 (the most 1000 differential expressed genes between all wounding time points vs. all non-wounding time points). Yellow columns indicate the p-value of the top 10 significantly enriched pathways. (C) Heat map of metabolic profiles. The peak value of each metabolite was normalized [log2 (peak area + 1)] to complete the linkage hierarchical clustering. Red indicates high abundance. The different color blocks on the left side of the heat map represent different types of wounding-induced volatiles; the different color blocks and number on the right represent different clusters. (D) The number of FDEGs of an area chart. FDEGs: The gene was differentially expressed for the first time at a specific time point. Green indicates down-regulated genes, whereas red indicates up-regulated genes. (E) The number of DEGs in an area chart. Green indicates down-regulated genes, whereas red indicates up-regulated genes. (F) Violin plot of FDEG expression distribution at each time point. The expression of each FDEG was normalized using log2 (FPKM).
FIGURE 2Clustering of co-expressed genes in the wounding response gene regulatory network. (A) A total of 18 distinct clusters that share similar expression dynamics were yielded using the Mfuzz package in R. The mean gene expression profile for each cluster was visualized with a heat map. Red and blue indicate up- and down-regulation of expression [log2 (fold change)]. Fold change = Y-Group/M-Group (e.g., Y-5/M-5). (B) Significantly overrepresented TF families in all clusters t (hypergeometric test; p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Enriched TF corresponding motifs and GO enrichment analysis in a wounding-responsive cluster. (A) The overrepresentation of TF binding motif within the up- and down-regulated cluster. Different color blocks represent different transcription factor families. Blue indicates a motif that is significantly overrepresented in the up- or down-cluster (cumulative hypergeometric distribution). (B) Typical co-expression clusters (line chart) with their newly discovered (de novo) TF-corresponding motifs (p < 0.01, cumulative hypergeometric distribution). The blue dots represent the significantly enriched GO terms (full GO results are available in Supplementary Dataset 4).
FIGURE 4Chronology analysis of the wounding-induced gene regulatory network: (A) various phases of wounding treatment induction. Differentially expressed genes were divided into four categories based on their annotation as a transcription factor or a structural gene and their expression patterns. The correlation matrix of gene expression between all pairs of time points was calculated by Pearson correlation and was further subjected to column clustering. Red and blue indicate high and low correlations, respectively. The time is in min. (B) Chronology chart of the wounding-induced gene regulatory network. The above part of the timeline represents the up-regulated phase, and the bottom part represents the down-regulated phase. The FDEGs in each phase were subjected to GO enrichment analysis. The waffle diagram shows the top 3 TF families in the gene set.
FIGURE 5Co-expression network of wounding-induced volatile formation. (A) Hierarchical clustering tree of DEGs based on WGCNA analysis. Each short black line (“leaf”) represents an individual gene. Different colored boxes below the hierarchical clustering tree represent genes with similar expression patterns, and these genes were clustered based on dissimilarity measures. Cut tree represents the cut height of the cluster tree; Merged dynamic represents further merge similar modules according to module eigengene. (B) Correlation heat map of four volatile substances and each module. Red and blue indicate high and low correlations, respectively. “*” indicates a significant correlation between the module and volatile substances (p < 0.05). The correlation value has been scaled. (C) Co-expression network diagram of candidate genes. The left side shows the TF-gene regulation network. When the weight value is greater than 0.5, we believe that there is a regulatory relationship between the candidate genes and TFs. The red dots represent the LOX, TSB, and TPS, respectively. The left side shows the KEGG undirected network diagram. The structural genes that have a potential relationship with candidate genes (weight value < 0.15) were chosen to construct a KEGG undirected network. The node size and color represents the number of genes enriched into the pathway. The larger purple node represents more genes in this pathway, and smaller yellow circles represent fewer genes.