| Literature DB >> 35154156 |
Wouter Korver1, Alan Wong1, Simon Gebremeskel1, Gian Luca Negri2, Julia Schanin1, Katherine Chang1, John Leung1, Zachary Benet1, Thuy Luu1, Emily C Brock1, Kenneth Luehrsen1, Alan Xu1, Bradford A Youngblood1.
Abstract
Immunomodulation of mast cell (MC) activity is warranted in allergic and inflammatory diseases where MCs have a central role in pathogenesis. Targeting Siglec-8, an inhibitory receptor on MCs and eosinophils, has shown promising activity in preclinical and clinical studies. While the intracellular pathways that regulate Siglec-8 activity in eosinophils have been well studied, the signaling mechanisms that lead to MC inhibition have not been fully elucidated. Here, we evaluate the intracellular signaling pathways of Siglec-8-mediated inhibition in primary MCs using an anti-Siglec-8 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Phospho-proteomic profiling of FcεRI-activated MCs revealed Siglec-8 mAb-treatment globally inhibited proximal and downstream kinases, leading to attenuated MC activation and degranulation. In fact, Siglec-8 was found to directly interact with FcεRI signaling molecules. Siglec-8 inhibition was dependent on both cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) that interact with the SH2 containing protein phosphatase Shp-2 upon Siglec-8 phosphorylation. Taken together, these data support a model in which Siglec-8 regulates proximal FcεRI-induced phosphorylation events through phosphatase recruitment and interaction with FcεRIγ, resulting in global inhibition of MCs upon Siglec-8 mAb engagement.Entities:
Keywords: IgE receptor; Siglec-8; intracellular signaling; mast cells; proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154156 PMCID: PMC8837033 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.833728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1BMMC from transgenic mice respond to FcεRI activation and express functional Siglec-8. (A) BMMC-S8 flow cytometry gating strategy. Right panel represents Siglec-8 staining (blue) and FMO stain (grey) (B) Levels of surrogate degranulation markers CD63 and CD107a on the cell surface of unstimulated MC (NS; black bars), when cross-linked with the anti-FcεRI antibody MAR-1 for 15 min (ISO + anti-FcεRI, grey bars) or co-cross-linked with MAR-1 and Siglec-8 mAb (S8 + anti-FcεRI, blue bars). (C) Histamine concentrations in the culture medium of MC collected 1 hour after stimulation as in (B). (D) Cytokine concentrations in the culture medium of MC collected 6 hours after stimulation. (E) Titration of isotype control mAb and Siglec-8 mAb in combination with anti-FcεRI-mediated (MAR-1) activation. Left panel: % of CD63 positive MC. Right panel: % of CD107a positive MC. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM (n=5) and are representative of 5 experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA test (B–D) or unpaired t test (E).
Figure 2Phospho-proteome of FcεRI-stimulated and Siglec-8-inhibited S8-BMMCs. (A) Schematic of the process for determining phospho-proteomes of MCs. (B) Volcano plots of Log2 fold change against statistical significance of the abundance of phospho-peptides 2 min after FcεRI crosslinking in the presence of isotype control antibody (top panel) or Siglec-8 mAb (bottom panel). Highlighted are the peptides upregulated more than 4-fold. (C) Heatmap of quantified phospho-peptides. Each line represents a unique phospho-peptide with the first two columns representing the unstimulated MCs in two independent experiments, the next two columns the phospho-proteome from MCs activated through FcεRI and the last two columns represent activation in the presence of a Siglec-8 mAb. The heatmap is ranked from top to bottom by fold induction upon activation averaged over the two experiments. Right panel: zoom in on the top sections of the heatmap in (C). (D) Bar graph representing the number of phosphosites predicted to be phosphorylated by the indicated kinase in the FcεRI stimulated conditions. (E) Kinase tree highlighting the kinases that are known to modify sites that showed differential phosphorylation between the isotype and Siglec-8 mAb conditions upon FcεRI activation.
Figure 3Both ITIM motifs are required for Siglec-8 mediated inhibition. (A) Schematic of the Siglec-8 receptor with its two tyrosine residues in the context of ITIM motifs indicated. (B) Percent of CD63 positive MC in unstimulated (ISO + NS, S8 + NS), stimulated (ISO + anti-FcεRI) and inhibited (S8 + anti-FcεRI) MC after transfection of the indicated wild-type or mutant Siglec-8 expression constructs Data are plotted as mean ± SEM (n=3) and are representative of 3 experiments. (C) Percent inhibition of Siglec-8 mAb-treatment for each Siglec-8 expression construct was calculated compared to ISO condition. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA test. (D) Western blot analysis of Siglec-8-Shp2 interaction. Immunoblot (IB) of whole cell lysates (WCL) or FLAG immunoprecipitations (IP) from primary MC mock transfected or with expression constructs for wild-type Siglec-8-FLAG or ITIM double mutant Siglec-8-FLAG. Cells were subjected to PVD treatment for two min and WCL were analyzed for presence of Shp-2 (panel 1) and p-Tyr (panel 4). Anti-FLAG IPs were analyzed for presence of Shp-2 (panel 2), Siglec-8-FLAG (panel 3) and p-Tyr (panel 5). Experiments were performed 2-3 times for confirmation.
Figure 4Siglec-8 interacts with FcεRI machinery components. (A) Western blot analysis of Siglec-8-FcεRIγ interaction. Immunoblot (IB) of whole cell lysates (WCL) or HA immunoprecipitations (IP) from primary MC transfected with expression constructs for Siglec-8-FLAG (lane 1) or FcεRIγ-HA (lane 3) or both (lane 2). Blots were developed with anti-FLAG (left panel) and anti-HA (right panel). (B) Western blot analysis of Siglec-8-Lyn interaction. WCL, isotype IP or S8 IP from S8-BMMC were developed using anti-Lyn or anti-Siglec-8 antibodies. (C) Confocal microscopy imaging of Siglec-8 (red) and FcεRI (green) in S8-BMMC. (D) Quantification of confocal images. Left panel: number of FcεRI punctae per cell (PE channel). Right panel: Siglec-8 median fluorescence intensity within FcεRI/Siglec-8 punctae (AF647 channel). Experiments were performed 2-3 times. NS, not significant, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA test.
Figure 5Model of Siglec-8 mediated inhibition of FcεRI signaling in MCs. (Left) Siglec-8 and FcεRI are distributed along the membrane of resting MC while partially colocalizing. (Middle) Cross-linking with MAR-1 anti-FcεRI results in high density clusters of FcεRI resulting in phosphorylation at the ITAM, subsequent MC activation/degranulation and partial exclusion of Siglec-8 from the activating complexes. (Right) In the presence of Siglec-8 mAb, phosphatases like Shp-2 are recruited to large complexes of activating (FcεRI) and inhibitory (Siglec-8) receptors resulting in potent inhibition of intracellular signaling.