| Literature DB >> 35153756 |
Yuting Yang1, Yu He1, Xiaoyu Wei1, Haitong Wan1, Zhishan Ding1, Jiehong Yang1, Huifen Zhou1.
Abstract
Salvianolic acid C (SAC) is a major bioactive component of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen), a Chinese herb for treating ischemic stroke (IS). However, the mechanism by which SAC affects the IS has not yet been evaluated, thus a network pharmacology integrated molecular docking strategy was performed to systematically evaluate its pharmacological mechanisms, which were further validated in rats with cerebral ischemia. A total of 361 potential SAC-related targets were predicted by SwissTargetPrediction and PharmMapper, and a total of 443 IS-related targets were obtained from DisGeNET, DrugBank, OMIM, and Therapeutic Target database (TTD) databases. SAC-related targets were hit by the 60 targets associated with IS. By Gene ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment combined with the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and cytoHubba plug-ins, nine related signaling pathways (proteoglycans in cancer, pathways in cancer, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, Focal adhesion, etc.), and 20 hub genes were identified. Consequently, molecular docking indicated that SAC may interact with the nine targets (F2, MMP7, KDR, IGF1, REN, PPARG, PLG, ACE and MMP1). Four of the target proteins (VEGFR2, MMP1, PPARγ and IGF1) were verified using western blot. This study comprehensively analyzed pathways and targets related to the treatment of IS by SAC. The results of western blot also confirmed that the SAC against IS is mainly related to anti-inflammatory and angiogenesis, which provides a reference for us to find and explore the effective anti-IS drugs.Entities:
Keywords: animal experiments; ischemic stroke; molecular docking; network pharmacology; salvianolic acid C
Year: 2022 PMID: 35153756 PMCID: PMC8828947 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.799448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Chemical structure of SAC and flowchart of the mechanisms of SAC against IS.
Pharmacological and molecular properties of SAC.
| Name | MW | AlogP | Hdon | Hacc | OB (%) | Caco-2 (nm/s) | BBB | DL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC | 492.46 | 4.53 | 6 | 10 | 2.50 | −0.23 | −1.02 | 0.81 |
FIGURE 2Intersection targets of SAC and IS (A). PPI network, Nodes represent proteins, and edges represent interactions (B).
FIGURE 3Results of GO enrichment analysis. The number of genes in each category is shown on top of each bar.
The enriched KEGG pathway and the related genes.
| Pathway | Genes | Fold enrichment | Q value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proteoglycans in cancer | PLAU, CASP3, ITGA2, ITGB3, KDR, MAPK1, IGF1, ESR1, MMP9, IGF1R | 6.03 | 0.0041 |
| Pathways in cancer | MMP1, PTGER2, ITGA2, ITGA2B, IGF1, MMP9, IGF1R, AR, EDNRA, EDNRB, CASP3, MAPK1, PPARG | 3.99 | 0.0041 |
| Estrogen signaling pathway | NOS3, MAPK1, ESR1, MMP9, ESR2, HSPA1B, HSPA1A | 8.53 | 0.0066 |
| Complement and coagulation cascades | F7, SERPINA1, PLAU, PLG, F2, F3 | 10.49 | 0.0081 |
| Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) | ACE, ITGA4, ITGA2, ITGB3, ITGA2B, IGF1 | 9.28 | 0.0115 |
| HIF-1 signaling pathway | NOS3, INSR, NPPA, MAPK1, IGF1, IGF1R | 7.54 | 0.0247 |
| Focal adhesion | ITGA4, ITGA2, ITGB3, ITGA2B, KDR, MAPK1, IGF1, IGF1R | 4.69 | 0.0260 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | CYP2C9, ALOX5, EPHX2, PLA2G2A, LTA4H | 9.89 | 0.0260 |
| PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | ITGA4, NOS3, ITGA2, ITGB3, INSR, ITGA2B, KDR, MAPK1, IGF1, IGF1R | 3.50 | 0.0269 |
FIGURE 4Results of top nine KEGG pathway enrichment.
FIGURE 5SAC-target-pathway network. The red V shape, green circles, and blue circles represent SAC, targets, and KEGG pathway, respectively.
FIGURE 6Top 20 hub genes.
The docking information of nine targets with SAC.
| Gene | Binding energy | Gene | Binding energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| F2 | −7.18 | PPARG | −5.72 |
| MMP7 | −6.40 | PLG | −5.60 |
| KDR | −6.33 | ACE | −5.42 |
| IGF1 | −6.31 | MMP1 | −5.22 |
| REN | −5.82 | — | — |
FIGURE 73D docking conformation of SAC with (A) KDR, (B) IGF1 (C) PPARG (D) MMP1, respectively. The green sticks represent SAC.
FIGURE 8Neurological deficit score of rats in each group after 7 days of SAC treatment (A). Representative photographs (B) and statistical results (C) of brain tissue in rats. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, vs the sham group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, vs the I/R group (n = 3).
FIGURE 9Representative images from western blot for the proteins (A) and relative expression levels of VEGFR2 (B), MMP1 (C), PPARγ (D), and IGF1 (E). **p < 0.01, vs the sham group. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, vs the I/R group (n = 3).