| Literature DB >> 35153641 |
Xiaohan Zang1, Baimin Li2, Lulu Zhao3, Dandan Yan1, Licai Yang1.
Abstract
Purpose: Depression is a common mental illness worldwide and has become an important public health problem. The current clinical diagnosis of depression mainly relies on the doctor's experience and subjective diagnosis, which results in the low diagnostic efficiency and insufficient objectivity of diagnostic results. Therefore, establishing a physiological and psychological model for computer-aided diagnosis is an urgent task. In order to solve the above problems, this article uses a convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify depression based on electrocardiogram (ECG).Entities:
Keywords: CNN; Computer-aided diagnosis; Depression; ECG; Inter-patient
Year: 2022 PMID: 35153641 PMCID: PMC8819200 DOI: 10.1007/s40846-022-00687-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Biol Eng ISSN: 1609-0985 Impact factor: 2.213
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| Healthy controls | Depression patients | |
| No | 37 | 37 |
| Gender, male/female | 18/19 | 14/23 |
| Age (year) | 38 ± 16 | 34.51 ± 11.56 |
| Height (cm) | 167.78 ± 8.60 | 165.78 ± 8.08 |
| Weight (kg) | 63.31 ± 8.90 | 65.70 ± 10.99 |
| Education, ≤ 12 years/ ≥ 13 years | 11/26 | 28/9 |
| Occupation, yes/no | 34/3 | 28/9 |
| Right handedness, yes/no | 36/1 | 34/3 |
| Smoking, yes/no | 6/31 | 8/29 |
| Drinking, yes/no | 0/37 | 0/37 |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 74.68 ± 10.27 | 84.22 ± 11.97 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 120.86 ± 15.74 | 116.97 ± 15.36 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 74.30 ± 10.05 | 75.62 ± 13.87 |
Data are expressed as number or mean ± standard deviation (std)
Fig. 2ECG signals. a before preprocessing and b after preprocessing
Fig. 1The framework of the proposed approach
A summary table of the proposed CNN model for this work
| No | Layer | Output shape | Kernel size for each output feature map | Stride |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Input | 1800 × 1 | – | – |
| 1 | Convolution | 1785 × 4 | 16 | 1 |
| 2 | Max-pooling | 357 × 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 3 | Convolution | 345 × 8 | 13 | 1 |
| 4 | Max-pooling | 69 × 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 5 | Fully-connected | 2 | – | – |
Fig. 3Confusion matrix of ECG segments of different durations. a 3 s, b 4 s, c 5 s, and d 6 s.( the test results are retained two decimal digits.)
Classification evaluation results of ECG segments of different durations
| Duration/s | Acc/100% | Se/100% | Sp/100% | Pp/100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 89.06 | 82.33 | 95.78 | 95.12 |
| 4 | 90.30 | 84.63 | 95.97 | 95.45 |
| 5 | 93.96 | 89.43 | 98.49 | 98.34 |
| 6 | 92.70 | 90.34 | 95.06 | 94.81 |
Acc accurary, Se sensitivity, Sp specificity, Pp positive productivity
Comparison of different convolutional layers
| Network architecture | Training time/s | Acc/100% | Se/100% | Sp/100% | Pp/100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNN with 5 layers | 319.87 | 93.96 | 89.43 | 98.49 | 98.34 |
| CNN with 7 layers | 694.069 | 93.87 | 89.43 | 98.30 | 98.14 |
| CNN with 9 layers | 2460.955 | 94.34 | 89.43 | 99.25 | 99.16 |
| CNN with 11 layers | 7285.258 | 94.91 | 90.19 | 99.62 | 99.58 |
| CNN with 13 layers | 25,217.295 | 94.53 | 89.62 | 99.43 | 99.37 |
Acc accurary, Se sensitivity, Sp specificity, Pp positive productivity
Fig. 4Model training process curve. a loss value and b accuracy rate
Comparison between the proposed recognition method and other existing approaches
| Author | Year | Subjects | Data | Features | Approach | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun et al. [ | 2016 | MDD:44, HC:47 | HRV sequence | 9 | Logistic regression analysis | Se:80% Sp:79% |
| Kuang et al. [ | 2017 | DP:38, HC:38 | HRV sequence | 64 | Bayesian networks, Ten-folds cross validation | Acc:86.4% Se:89.5% Sp:84.2% |
| Byun et al. [ | 2019 | MDD:37, HC:41 | HRV sequence | 100 | SVM, leave-one-out(LOO) cross validation | Acc:74.4% Se:73% Sp:75.6% |
| Byun et al. [ | 2019 | MDD:33, HC:33 | HRV sequence | 20 | SVM, leave-one-out(LOO) cross validation | Acc:70% Se:64% Sp:76% |
| Xing et al. [ | 2019 | DP:14, HC:15 | HRV sequence | 33 | SVM, leave-one-patient-out cross validation | Acc:89.66% Se:85.71% Sp:93.33% Pp:92.31% |
| Kim et al. [ | 2019 | DP:10, HC:14 | HRV sequence | 22 | Neuro-fuzzy network, leave-one-out(LOO) cross validation | Acc:86.6% |
| Our method | 2021 | DP:37, HC:37 | ECG | – | A 5 layers CNN | Acc:93.96% Se:89.43% Sp:98.49% Pp:98.34% |
DP depression patients, MDD major depressive disorder, HC healthy control