| Literature DB >> 35153489 |
Barbara Oliveira1, Kaja Falkenhain1, Jonathan P Little1.
Abstract
Diabetes is characterized by an impaired ability to appropriately control blood glucose. Postprandial hyperglycemia, in particular, is associated with complications in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The objective of this study was to determine how sugar-free dark chocolate sweetened with stevia, erythritol, and inulin impacts postprandial blood glucose levels in individuals with diabetes compared to conventional dark chocolate. In a randomized crossover design, 13 participants consumed 1 bar (34 g) of sugar-free dark chocolate or 1 bar (34 g) of conventional dark chocolate with glucose levels measured before and throughout a 120-min postprandial period. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was lower after the consumption of sugar-free dark chocolate (-65%, P = .04) compared to conventional dark chocolate. No significant differences between chocolates were found for peak glucose value above baseline, the total area under the curve, or peak glucose values. Our results suggest that a sugar-free dark chocolate bar sweetened with stevia, erythritol and inulin led to a lower blood glucose iAUC compared to the conventional dark chocolate bar in people with diabetes, whilst longer-term effects on glucose control remain to be determined.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; chocolate; glucose
Year: 2022 PMID: 35153489 PMCID: PMC8832613 DOI: 10.1177/11786388221076962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab Insights ISSN: 1178-6388
Nutritional composition of sugar-free dark chocolate and conventional dark chocolate.
| Sugar-free dark chocolate | Conventional dark chocolate | |
|---|---|---|
| Grams (g) | 34 | 34 |
| Calories (kcal) | 150 | 193 |
| Fat (g) | 15 | 14 |
| Saturated fat (g) | 9 | 8 |
| Trans fat (g) | 0 | 0 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 0 | 0 |
| Sodium (mg) | 0 | 11 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 16 | 16 |
| Fibers (g) | 8 | 5 |
| Sugars (g) | 0 | 10 |
| Protein (g) | 2 | 3 |
| Cocoa (%) | 66 | 70 |
Information obtained from the manufacturer and the packaging of each chocolate.
Figure 1.CONSORT flow.
A = sugar-free dark chocolate; B = conventional dark chocolate.
Self-reported baseline characteristics of participants.
| Characteristic | Total | Type 1 diabetes | Type 2 diabetes |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 13 | 6 | 7 |
| Female, n (%) | 10 (77) | 6 (100) | 4 (57) |
| Age, mean (SD), years | 51.1 (13.8) | 47.5 (18.4) | 54.1 (8.6) |
| Weight, mean (SD), kg | 84.9 (23.3) | 68.6 (6.1) | 98.8 (23.7) |
| BMI, mean (SD) | 29.0 (5.6) | 25.3 (2.7) | 32.2 (5.5) |
| HbA1c, mean (SD), % | 7.3 (0.5) | 7.2 (0.4) | 7.4 (0.7) |
Figure 2.Glucose responses across 120 min after the consumption of a conventional dark chocolate bar and a sugar-free dark chocolate bar in participants with diabetes. Chocolate bars were consumed in the fasted state and blood glucose was assessed in finger prick samples. Values are means ± SD (N = 12).
Figure 3.Glucose response to sugar-free versus conventional dark chocolate.
Glucose response following consumption of either sugar-free (left) or conventional (right) dark chocolate is shown for (A) glucose incremental area under the curve, (B) peak glucose values above baseline, (C) glucose area under the curve, and (D) peak glucose values. Chocolates were consumed in a fasted state, and glucose was measured via finger prick after 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Individual participant values are shown in the connected gray lines and the group mean is shown using the bolded black line. Conditions were compared using Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (A and B) or Paired T-test (C and D). N = 12.