| Literature DB >> 35153433 |
Dipti Shastri1, Pradeep Tandon1, Ankita Singh1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate nasal changes in different age groups and to detect gender difference in nasal dimensions.Entities:
Keywords: Different age groups; gender; nasal changes
Year: 2021 PMID: 35153433 PMCID: PMC8820299 DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_246_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Natl J Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 0975-5950
Figure 1Landmarks: N', Soft-tissue nasion, Sn, Subnasale. The nasal height was measured using digital caliper, from soft-tissue nasion (N') to subnasale point
Measurements used in the study
| Measurements | Description |
|---|---|
| NH | NH was measured from the nasion to the anterior nasal spine |
| NB | NB was measured as the maximum horizontal distance across the nasal aperture |
| Nasal index | Nasal index was calculated as NB/NH×100 |
| Nasolabial angle | Angle between the tangent to upper lip and nasal tip: The nasolabial angle |
NB: Nasal breadth, NH: Nasal height
Figure 2The nasal breadth measured by using digital caliper, it is the maximum breadth of nose was measured from right ala to left ala at right angle to the nasal height
Figure 3The nasolabial angle was measured, the angle between a line tangent to the base of the nose and a line tangent to the upper lip
Descriptive statistics and significance of mean differences nasal measurements between males and females by Duncan’s multiple range post hoc test
| Measurements | Groups | Sex (mean±SD) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Male | Female | |||
| NH (mm) | Group 1 | 50.01±2.55 | 48.56±1.32 | <0.001*** |
| Group 2 | 54.22±1.02 | 50.34±1.65 | <0.001*** | |
| Group 3 | 57.10±4.12 | 51.10±1.54 | <0.001*** | |
| Group 4 | 58.11±3.12 | 52.11±3.65 | <0.008** | |
| Nasal breadth (mm) | Group 1 | 31.02±3.22 | 31.65±1.87 | 0.832 |
| Group 2 | 32.84±1.21 | 29.22±1.54 | 0.738 | |
| Group 3 | 33.34±2.34 | 30.10±5.32 | 0.247 | |
| Group 4 | 34.86±2.55 | 33.11±4.19 | 0.354 | |
| Nasal index (percentage) | Group 1 | 60.02±1.88 | 61.65±1.32 | 0.743 |
| Group 2 | 58.13±2.43 | 56.33±2.14 | 0.453 | |
| Group 3 | 57.56±4.01 | 57.42±1.43 | 0.278 | |
| Group 4 | 62.65±5.11 | 61.11±1.54 | 0.479 | |
| Nasolabial angle (degree) | Group 1 | 96.06±3.15 | 95.46±2.44 | 0.116 |
| Group 2 | 94.53±1.98 | 94.23±2.37 | 0.204 | |
| Group 3 | 92.43±5.31 | 93.58±1.95 | 0.674 | |
| Group 4 | 90.15±3.22 | 90.11±2.53 | 0.453 | |
**Moderately significant, ***P<0.001 Highly significant, NS: Nonsignificant,
SD: Standard deviation
Comparisons of nasal measurements between the four age groups within males and within females (Duncan’s multiple range post hoc test)
| Comparison | NH (mm) | NB (mm) | Nasal index (percentage) | Nasolabial angle (degree) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Group 1 versus Group 2 | 0.004** | 0.006** | 0.232 | 0.432 | 0.439 | 0.856 | 0.353 | 0.242 |
| Group 1 versus Group 3 | 0.003** | 0.218 | 0.372 | 0.754 | 0.844 | 0.543 | 0.003** | 0.002** |
| Group 1 versus Group 4 | 0.021* | 0.131 | 0.004** | 0.003** | 0.003** | 0.004** | 0.002** | 0.002** |
| Group 2 versus Group 3 | 0.423 | 0.322 | 0.031* | 0.453 | 0.024* | 0.034 | 0.453 | 0.546 |
| Group 2 versus Group 4 | 0.44* | 0.31* | 0.035* | 0.048* | 0.022* | 0.045* | 0.36* | 0.644 |
| Group 3 versus Group 4 | 0.235 | 0.659 | 0.352 | 0.232 | 0.852 | 0.765 | 0.643 | 0.931 |
*Just significant, **Moderately significant, NS: Nonsignificant, NB: Nasal breath, Nasal height