| Literature DB >> 35152800 |
Fangxin Peng1, Yichuan Hu2, Shu Peng1, Ni Zeng1, Lei Shi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is one of the major causes encouraging the elevation of androgens, obesity along with menstrual complications. Here we study the effect of Apigenin in rat model of polycystic ovarian syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: Apigenin; anti-oxidant; lipid profile; polycystic ovarian syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35152800 PMCID: PMC8843206 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2034933
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med ISSN: 0785-3890 Impact factor: 4.709
Body weight, body mass index, levels of glucose, diameter of ovary, weight of ovary, diameter of ovary.
| Parameters | Control | PCOS | PCOS + MTF | PCOS + Apigenin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight Initial (g) | 181.5 ± 1.22 | 181.3 ± 1.38 | 181.6 ± 1.65 | 181.55 ± 1.45 |
| Body weight final (g) | 198.65 ± 1.88 | 226.3 ± 2.89 | 195.22 ± 1.77 | 199.1 ± 1.59 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 57.55 ± 0.55 | 71.50 ± 0.61*** | 56.44 ± 0.41### | 56.50 ± 0.51### |
| Ovary weight (mg) | 3.65 ± 0.11 | 5.25 ± 0.23*** | 3.82 ± 0.15### | 3.87 ± 0.54### |
| Ovary diameter (mm) | 28.65 ± 0.85 | 67.44 ± 1.95*** | 30.1 ± 1.43### | 31.54 ± 1.02### |
Values are mean ± SEM, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 compared to control, #<.05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 compared to PCOS group.
Thickness of peripheral granulosa, theca layer of secondary, tertiary and cystic follicles.
| Parameters | Control | PCOS | PCOS + MTF | PCOS + Apigenin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary follicles | ||||
| Diameter (µm) | 237.85 ± 3.11 | 273.44 ± 5.47 | 230.17 ± 4.55# | 239.45 ± 4.95# |
| Thickness of granulosa (µm) | 47.22 ± 1.52 | 51.11 ± 2.54 | 42.15 ± 1.05 | 42.95 ± 1.85 |
| Thickness of theca (µm) | 21.54 ± 1.55 | 22.85 ± 1.15 | 22.24 ± 1.03 | 21.55 ± 1.13 |
| Tertiary follicles | ||||
| Diameter (µm) | 423.54 ± 9.22 | 473.56 ± 12.14 | 415.35 ± 11.21 | 405.25 ± 10.35 |
| Thickness of granulosa (µm) | 53.24 ± 2.56 | 34.52 ± 2.11** | 54.25 ± 1.95## | 50.14 ± 2.56# |
| Thickness of theca (µm) | 25.65 ± 2.10 | 22.12 ± 1.25 | 24.13 ± 1.33 | 22.95 ± 1.52 |
| Cystic follicles | ||||
| Diameter (µm) | 0 | 604.52 ± 8.52*** | 485.15 ± 13.25### | 528.65 ± 12.55 |
| Thickness of granulosa (µm) | 0 | 31.25 ± 1.14*** | 32.56 ± 2.55*** | 37.14 ± 2.58***# |
| Thickness of theca (µm) | 0 | 25.04 ± 1.51*** | 23.51 ± 1.14*** | 27.85 ± 2.44*** |
Values are mean ± SEM, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 compared to control, #<.05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 compared to PCOS group.
Figure 1.Histological analysis of various ovarian follicles in PCOS induced and control rats. (A) Primordial follicle showing flat layer of granulosa cells (GC) along with oocytes (O) at ×40. (B) Primary follicles with well-defined oocyte ×40. (C) Secondary follicle having fluid and defined oocyte ×40. (D) Tertiary follicle having theca (T), granulosa cells (GC) and antrum (A) ×40. (E) Graffian follicle having a huge antrum, oocyte, corona radiate (CR) and zona pellucida (ZP) ×40. (F) Cystic follicle showing a huge antrum devoid of oocyte. All images were captured at ×40.
The number of ovarian follicles (mean ± SEM).
| Developing follicles | Control | PCOS | PCOS + MTF | PCOS + Apigenin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus luteum | 3.55 ± 0.25 | 1.65 ± 0.10*** | 3.61 ± 0.21### | 3.45 ± 0.25### |
| Atretic Follicle | 2.83 ± 0.15 | 7.95 ± 0.92*** | 3.31 ± 0.25### | 3.02 ± 0.23### |
| Cystic Follicle | 0 | 11.42 ± 0.52*** | 1.61 ± 0.21### | 1.63 ± 0.33### |
| Graffian | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.21 | 0.73 ± 0.16 | 0.86 ± 0.21 |
| Primodial | 7.86 ± 0.36 | 7.35 ± 0.10 | 8.12 ± 0.12 | 7.88 ± 0.15 |
| Primary | 6.83 ± 0.25 | 5.53 ± 0.21 | 6.89 ± 0.55# | 6.93 ± 0.12# |
| Secondary | 2.05 ± 0.1 | 0.63 ± 0.03* | 2.12 ± 0.25## | 2.01 ± 0.44# |
| Tertiary | 1.63 ± 0.25 | 0.17 ± 0.01*** | 1.32 ± 0.18## | 1.29 ± 0.20## |
| Tertiary | 1.63 ± 0.21 | 0.17 ± 0.13 | 1.31 ± 0.20 | 1.27 ± 0.19 |
Values are mean ± SEM, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 compared to control, #<.05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 compared to PCOS group.
Biochemical parameters.
| Parameters | Control | PCOS | PCOS + MTF | PCOS + Apigenin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oestradiol (pg/ml) | 9.32 ± 0.42 | 1.63 ± 0.30*** | 9.26 ± 0.60### | 8.87 ± 0.23### |
| Progesterone (ng/ml) | 40.01 ± 2.31 | 11.16 ± 1.21*** | 33.95 ± 2.15### | 35.01 ± 1.47### |
| Testosterone (ng/ml) | 0.39 ± 0.004 | 1.68 ± 0.19*** | 0.53 ± 0.13### | 0.81 ± 0.15### |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 55.65 ± 0.65 | 64.02 ± 1.02*** | 55.96 ± 1.52### | 55.85 ± 1.52### |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 52.12 ± 0.85 | 68.25 ± 1.65*** | 58.96 ± 2.3### | 56.45 ± 0.96### |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 28.65 ± 0.23 | 22.20 ± 1.35*** | 26.20 ± 0.35*### | 24.21 ± 0.85*** |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 16.67 ± 0.65 | 27.12 ± 1.85*** | 20.50 ± 1.21# | 19.76 ± 1.36## |
| VLDL-C (mg/dl) | 10.65 ± 0.35 | 14.21 ± 1.66* | 11.86 ± 0.32 | 9.98 ± 0.35# |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 0.61 ± 0.003 | 1.65 ± 0.004*** | 0.73 ± 0.02*### | 0.66 ± 0.004### |
| TC/HDL-C | 1.98 ± 0.003 | 3.37 ± 0.04** | 2.21 ± 0.04## | 1.73 ± 0.003### |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.85 ± 0.003 | 2.73 ± 0.45 | 2.35 ± 0.07 | 2.18 ± 0.20 |
| Total protein (mg/g) | 33.75 ± 0.55 | 27.35 ± 1.41* | 31.75 ± 1.65 | 30.75 ± 1.01 |
| CAT (u/mg) | 33.68 ± 1.45 | 5.28 ± 0.15*** | 30.75 ± 0.88### | 40.85 ± 0.95**###@@@ |
| SOD (u/mg) | 8.20 ± 0.20 | 5.61 ± 0.23*** | 6.86 ± 0.15**# | 9.25 ± 0.33**###@@@ |
| POD (µM/min) | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 1.31 ± 0.11*** | 1.02 ± 0.05***# | 0.76 ± 0.03*###@@ |
| TBARS (µM/mg) | 24.02 ± 0.35 | 32.56 ± 2.55** | 31.52 ± 0.86* | 26.25 ± 1.35# |
| GR (nM/mg protein) | 1.45 ± 0.04 | 1.22 ± 0.08*** | 1.29 ± 0.03## | 1.42 ± 0.02## |
Values are mean ± SEM, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 compared to control, #<.05, ##p < .01, ###p < .001 compared to PCOS group, @@p < .01, @@@p < .001 compared to PCOS + MTF group.
Figure 3.Elisa analysis of inflammatory cytokines in different treatment groups. ***p < .001 compared to control, ###p < .001 compared to PCOS group.