Hironari Kaneyama1,2, Yuichiro Morishita3, Osamu Kawano3, Takuaki Yamamoto4, Takeshi Maeda3. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spinal Injuries Center, Iizuka, Japan. kaneyamahironari@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. kaneyamahironari@gmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spinal Injuries Center, Iizuka, Japan. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a case series of five participants. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effects of post-cervical laminoplasty on the clinical pathophysiology of traumatic CSCI. Cervical laminoplasty has been widely performed with good results in individuals for cervical myelopathy. However, no reports have thus far referred to the incidence of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) after previous history of cervical laminoplasty. SETTING: Spinal Injuries Center, Japan. METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 999 cervical myelopathy individuals were treated by cervical laminoplasty in our institution. Of these, only five participants were subsequently emergency transported to our institution caused by traumatic CSCI. The pathology of five participants were cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (C-OPLL). The changes of cervical sagittal range of motion (ROM) and the morphology of OPLL were radiologically evaluated. Moreover, the mechanism of injury, the level of injury, and neurological evaluations were discussed. RESULTS: All of the participants demonstrated ankylosed cervical spine due to developing OPLL and spontaneous bony facet and laminar fusion on post-laminoplasty. A significant difference in cervical ROM was observed between pre-laminoplasty and 6 months post-laminoplasty (p = 0.0065). Three participants were extension injury and the other two were flexion injury. CONCLUSIONS: All of the five traumatic CSCI participants had a history of previous cervical laminoplasty for C-OPLL. Cervical laminoplasty for C-OPLL might lead to cervical spine with rigidity and ankylosing due to developing OPLL and bony facet and laminar fusion, and might have a risk for traumatic CSCI.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a case series of five participants. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effects of post-cervical laminoplasty on the clinical pathophysiology of traumatic CSCI. Cervical laminoplasty has been widely performed with good results in individuals for cervical myelopathy. However, no reports have thus far referred to the incidence of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) after previous history of cervical laminoplasty. SETTING: Spinal Injuries Center, Japan. METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 999 cervical myelopathy individuals were treated by cervical laminoplasty in our institution. Of these, only five participants were subsequently emergency transported to our institution caused by traumatic CSCI. The pathology of five participants were cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (C-OPLL). The changes of cervical sagittal range of motion (ROM) and the morphology of OPLL were radiologically evaluated. Moreover, the mechanism of injury, the level of injury, and neurological evaluations were discussed. RESULTS: All of the participants demonstrated ankylosed cervical spine due to developing OPLL and spontaneous bony facet and laminar fusion on post-laminoplasty. A significant difference in cervical ROM was observed between pre-laminoplasty and 6 months post-laminoplasty (p = 0.0065). Three participants were extension injury and the other two were flexion injury. CONCLUSIONS: All of the five traumatic CSCI participants had a history of previous cervical laminoplasty for C-OPLL. Cervical laminoplasty for C-OPLL might lead to cervical spine with rigidity and ankylosing due to developing OPLL and bony facet and laminar fusion, and might have a risk for traumatic CSCI.